臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：家事分工性別化內隱與外顯測驗發展之初探研究
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：藍玉玲 引用關係／林烘煜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lan, Yu-ling／Lin, Hung-yu
出版日期：2018
卷期：50:2
頁次：頁189-217
主題關鍵詞：內隱測量；性別刻板印象；家務分工；Domestic labor；Gender stereotype；Implicit measure
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:177
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究目的有二：（1）發展「家務性別角色量表（Domestic Gender Role Scale, DGRS）」與「家務性別角色內隱聯結測驗（Domestic Gender Role Implicit Association Test, DGR IAT）」，測量台灣人家務分工的外顯與內隱性別刻板印象；及（2）檢驗DGRS與DGR IAT信、效度。本研究先招募92位Y世代台灣人參與預備性研究，完成DGRS初步發展與DGR IAT家務工作的詞彙選擇；再招募99位Y世代與50位嬰兒潮世代台灣人，共149位成為正式研究參與者以檢驗這兩個測驗的信、效度。刪題後之驗證性因素分析結果證實DGRS的因素結構與預期相符，包含男、女、中性家事三面向；因素結構與實際觀察資料適配度良好。除了嬰兒潮世代男性家事分量表信度係數略低於.70之外，DGRS三分量表的alpha值與組合信度皆高於.70，具有良好的信度。DGR IAT方面，僅在嬰兒潮世代先進行和諧版施測的信度係數高於.70，仍有部分改善空間；但其IAT效果已達顯著，證實DGR IAT適用於台灣人家務分工的內隱性別刻板印象測量。透過相關分析證實DGR IAT與DGRS之間，呈現低度相關，顯示兩者所測量的構念不盡相同，具有區別效度，且DGRS三個因素之間，呈現中度相關，證實DGRS之聚斂效度。以新發展測驗而言，研究結果初步證實DGRS 與DGR IAT具有構念效度、DGRS的信度良好，但DGR IAT的信度仍可進一步改善；後續研究可招募不同教育程度、婚姻狀況的台灣人參與研究，驗證其跨樣本的穩定性及應用性。
The purpose of this study was to develop and examine the psychometric properties of two new instruments-the Domestic Gender Role Scale (DGRS) and the Domestic Gender Role Implicit Association Test (DGR IAT)-in assessing Taiwanese people’s explicit and implicit gender stereotypes regarding domestic labor. In a pilot study, 92 Taiwanese adults were recruited to obtain a sample of genderized household chores for development of the initial DGRS and DGR IAT versions. In the main study, another 149 Taiwanese people were recruited on a voluntary basis to examine the psychometric properties of the DGRS and DGR IAT. Confirmatory factor analysis of this sample indicated that the DGRS was a three-factor model. Except for the DGRS subscale for male baby boomers, the Cronbach's alpha values and composite reliability coefficients of the three DGRS subscale scores were all above .7, indicating satisfactory reliability. The significant IAT effects of the DGR IAT indicated that it was a valid instrument for assessing implicit gender stereotypes regarding domestic labor. Its reliability coefficient was over .7 only when assessing Taiwanese baby boomers using the congruent association-first version of the DGR IAT. Moreover, the weak association between its IAT effects and the three DGRS subscale scores revealed the divergent validity of these two instruments, whereas the moderate correlation among the three DGRS subscale scores indicated its convergent validity. As newly developed instruments, the DGRS demonstrated suitable reliability and validity, whereas the DGR IAT had suitable validity but required further modifications to improve its reliability. This study provided only an initial validation of these two instruments, and further research should validate their psychometric properties using samples with diverse education levels and marital statuses.
期刊論文
1.Coltrane, Scott(2000)。Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work。Journal of Marriage and Family，62(4)，1208-1233。  new window
2.陳學志、黃宏宇、邱發忠、楊立行、卓淑玲(2011)。態度的表象與真實：內隱測驗典範的現況與發展。αβγ量化研究學刊，3(1)，54-77。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lennon, M. C.、Rosenfield, S.(1994)。Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options。American Journal of Sociology，100(2)，506-531。  new window
4.Knudsen, K.、Wærness, K.(2008)。National context and spouses' housework in 34 countries。European Sociological Review，24(1)，97-113。  new window
5.陳學志、李威震、周泰安、卓淑玲(20020700)。以內隱聯結測驗(IAT)測量國人自尊的可行性研究。測驗年刊，49(2)，217-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Payne, B. K.、Burkley, M. A.、Stokes, M. B.(2008)。Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，94，16-31。  new window
7.Greenwald, A. G.、Banaji, M. R.、Rudman, L. A.、Farnham, S. D.、Nosek, B. A.、Mellott, D. S.(2002)。A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept。Psychological Review，109(1)，3-25。  new window
8.Fuwa, Makiko(2004)。Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries。American Sociological Review，69(6)，751-767。  new window
9.Hofmann, W.、Gawronski, B.、Gschwendner, T.、Le, H.、Schmitt, M. J.(2005)。A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures。Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin，31(10)，1369-1385。  new window
10.Greenwald, A. G.、Nosek, B. A.、Banaji, M. R.(2003)。Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，85(2)，197-216。  new window
11.蕭英玲(20050600)。臺灣的家務分工：經濟依賴及性別的影響。臺灣社會學刊，34，115-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.McDonald, P.(2002)。Sustaining fertility through public policy: The range of options。Population，57(3)，417-446。  new window
13.蔡孟寧、王倫婷、林烘煜(20150900)。情感錯誤歸因程序的自動化反應態度測量檢視。中華心理學刊，57(3)，261-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Bar-Anan, Y.、Nosek, B. A.(2014)。A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures。Behavior Research Methods，46，668-688。  new window
15.Bass, B. C.(2014)。Preparing for parenthood? Gender, aspirations, and the reproduction of labor market inequality。Gender and Society，29(3)，326-385。  new window
16.Becton, J. B.、Walker, H. J.、Jones-Farmer, A.(2014)。Generational differences in work-place behavior。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，44，175-189。  new window
17.Cennamo, L.、Gardner, D.(2008)。Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person organization values fit。Journal of Managerial Psychology，23，891-906。  new window
18.Civettini, N.(2016)。Housework as non-normative gender display among lesbians and gay men。Sex Roles，74，206-219。  new window
19.Fernández, J.、Quiroga, M. A.、Escorial, S.、Privado, J.(2014)。Explicit and implicit assessment of gender roles。Psicothema，26，244-251。  new window
20.Grunow, D.、Schulz, F.、Blossfeld, H.(2012)。What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage?。International Sociology，27，289-307。  new window
21.Hodges, A. J.、Park, B.(2013)。Oppositional identities: Dissimilarities in how women and men experience parent versus professional roles。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，105，193-216。  new window
22.Lachance-Grzela, M.、Bouchard, G.(2010)。Why do women do the lion's share of housework? A decade of research。Sex Roles，63，767-780。  new window
23.Nosek, B. A.、Bar-Anan, Y.、Sriram, N.、Axt, J.、Greenwald, A. G.(2014)。Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recom-mended scoring procedures。Plos One，9(12)。  new window
24.Park, B.、Smith, J. A.、Correll, Joshua(2010)。The persistence of implicit behavioral associations for moms and dad。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，46，809-815。  new window
25.Rudman, L. A.、Greenwald, A. G.、McGhee, D. E.(2001)。Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable trait。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，27，1164-1178。  new window
26.Treas, J.、Tai, T.(2016)。Gender inequality in housework across 20 European Nations: Lessons from gender stratification theories。Sex Roles，74，495-511。  new window
27.Van Well, S.、Kolk, A. M.、Oei, N. Y. L.(2007)。Direct and indirect assessment of gender role identification。Sex Roles，56，617-628。  new window
28.陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁(20050900)。工作與家庭的雙向衝突：前因、後果及調節變項之探討。應用心理研究，27，133-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.張晉芬、李奕慧(20070600)。「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」：家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊，19(2)，203-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.王叢桂、羅國英(20100600)。自我發展與利他服務價值觀的融合：華人工作價值的變遷與發展。本土心理學研究，33，3-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.王叢桂(19990600)。性別角色信念、家庭承諾、工作承諾與工作價值之關係。本土心理學研究，11，59-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，6(1)，1-55。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計總處(2017)。婦女婚育與就業調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eagly, A. H.(1987)。Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-role Interpretation。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Gawronski, B.、Payne, B. K.(2010)。Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
3.金耀基(2013)。中國社會與文化。香港：牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Charles, Maria、Grusky, David B.(2004)。Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men。Stanford, California：Stanford University Press。  new window
5.Gerson, K.(2010)。The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.DeVellis, Robert F.(1991)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。Sage。  new window
7.余民寧(2011)。教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Schulz, W.，Ainley, J.，Fraillon, J.，Kerr, D.，Losito, B.(2010)。ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower secondary school students in thirty-eight countries，http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/IC CS_2009_International_Report.pdf。  new window
2.蔡志浩(2005)。菜市場名的背後，http://taiwan.chtsai.org/2005/08/11/caishichang_ming_de_beihou/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Eagly, A. H.、Wood, W.(2011)。Social role theory: A biosocial analysis of sex differences and similarities。Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology。London：Sage。  new window
2.Treas, J.(2010)。Why study housework?。Men, women, and housework in cross-national perspective。Stanford, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：656（臺灣：645，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67167153
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上