臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：探索五位理工科女性世界中的創造力：她們對創造力的詮釋以及理工背景對其創造力的影響
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：宋玉英／高振耀 引用關係
作者(外文)：Sung, Yuk-ying／Kao, Chen-yao
出版日期：2019
卷期：64:3
頁次：頁55-84
主題關鍵詞：理工科女性；創造力；聚斂思考；擴散思考；Convergent thinking；Creativity；Divergent thinking；Females majoring in science and engineering
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:9
本研究從理工科女性的角度探討其如何詮釋創造力，同時瞭解她們的生活經驗對其創造力展現的影響。研究者從女性主義的立場出發，採用質性研究中的敘事研究法進行闡述，以立意取樣選定五位研究參與者，並透過半結構式的深入訪談、非參與性觀察及文件檢視以蒐集資料。研究結果發現，五位理工科女性的共同特質包括處事態度嚴謹、目標導向、喜歡彈性靈活的模式、對學習與工作充滿自信、多樣的興趣嗜好及正向積極六項特質；另外，從能力的觀點，她們定義創造力為解決問題的能力、發挸更多新問題的能力、表達的能力及改變的能力，而解決問題的能力是其核心，此反映出科學創造力的本質；至於富有創造力產品的元素，除了新穎，她們還提到成本效益、滿足客戶需求、美感、好玩等。此外，五位理工科女性基本上皆認為理工科系嚴謹的邏輯思考訓練對於創造力展現是有所幫助的，此與文獻所提出創造力的展現不僅需要擴散思考亦需要聚斂思考的論點不謀而合。還有值得注意的一點是，五位研究參與者皆提出創造力不僅可以表現在藝術方面且可以涵蓋各個領域的看法，此乃支持了創造力存在於人類各個活動領域之論述，也說明了過去有些實證研究以學生的主修領域來區分高低創造力組是不適宜的，同時給予將來有關創造力的實證研究可資參酌之提醒。
This study examined how women majoring in science and engineering interpreted creativity and how their life experiences affected their expression of creativity. This study used a qualitative research method for narrative inquiry combined with the feminist approach to explore major research questions. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit five participants. Data collection involved semistructured in-depth interviews, document review, and observation. Data analysis revealed six qualities these women had in common: earnestness, goal orientation, preference for flexibility, professional and academic confidence, diverse interests, and proactive attitudes. From the perspective of ability, these women defined creativity as the ability to solve problems, to produce problems, to express themselves, and to facilitate transformation. They believed that the ability to solve problems was at the heart of creativity, which was in line with the essence of scientific creativity. For key elements in creative products, they mentioned novelty, cost-performance ratio, customization, aesthetic feeling, and playfulness. Moreover, they believed that logical reasoning derived from their professional training was helpful for their expression of creativity, supporting the argument that convergent thinking is integral to creativity. Notably, these women mentioned that creativity could be expressed not merely in arts but in any human endeavor, upholding the viewpoint that creativity exists in every field. This also implies that some empirical studies' use of college students' majors as a means for categorizing them into high- and low-creativity groups is inappropriate and suggests that such research design should be avoided in future.
期刊論文
1.吳淑敏(20090300)。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，34(1)，75-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.于曉平(20020900)。雙親在資優生生涯發展中的角色之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，23，141-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Turner, S.(2009)。ASIT: a problem solving strategy for education and eco-friendly sustainable design。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，19(2)，221-235。  new window
4.郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉(20060300)。女性資優生在工作或學業上的助力、阻力、因應及轉變。教育研究月刊，143，41-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.于曉平(20050900)。高中數理資優女生選擇進入基礎科學科系之歷程研究。特殊教育研究學刊，29，337-361。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Marra, R. M.、Rodgers, K. A.、Shen, D.、Bogue, B.(2009)。Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy。Journal of Engineering Education，98(1)，27-38。  new window
7.李志峰、楊慶南、邱智麟(20031200)。大葉大學學生運動性休閒參與動機之研究。大葉學報，12(2)，99-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.高振耀(20120600)。解開創造力的奧秘：創造力的四個P。特教論壇，12，1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Webster, Jane、Martocchio, Joseph J.(1992)。Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications。MIS Quarterly，16(2)，201-226。  new window
10.郭靜姿、陳若男、林美和、簡維君、張靖卿、胡寶玉、謝佳男、周佩蓉(20071200)。重要他人對於高中資優班畢業女性生涯發展的影響。資優教育研究，7(2)，1-18。  延伸查詢new window
11.Benedek, M.、Könen, T.、Neubauer, A. C.(2012)。Associative abilities underlying creativity。Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts，6(3)，273-281。  new window
12.郭靜姿、王雅奇、林美和、吳舜文、簡維君、張靖卿、胡寶玉、謝佳男、周佩蓉(20090300)。五位高中資優班畢業優秀女性之人格特質與生涯發展分析。特殊教育研究學刊，34(1)，47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.洪秀珍、謝臥龍、駱慧文(20130300)。性別刻板印象與數學相關專業發展之研究：以科技大學工程女學生為例。屏東教育大學學報. 教育類，40，77-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳雅婉、陳雅姿(20120600)。尋找下一個居禮夫人--從傳記探討數理資優女性的成功。資優教育，123，27-34。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kao, C.(2011)。The dilemmas of peer relationships confronting mathematically gifted female adolescents: Nine cases in Taiwan。Gifted Child Quarterly，55(2)，83-94。  new window
16.Kao, C.(2015)。Mathematically gifted adolescent females' mixed sentiment toward gender stereotypes。Social Psychology of Education，18(1)，17-35。  new window
17.Kogan, N.(1974)。Creativity and sex differences。Journal of Creative Behavior，8(1)，1-14。  new window
18.Bateson, P.、Nettle, D.(2014)。Playfulness, ideas, and creativity: A Survey。Creativity Research Journal，26(2)，219-222。  new window
19.吳慧敏(20020200)。臺灣物理界女性工作者之現況調查。物理，24(1)，15-16。  延伸查詢new window
20.周保男(20130600)。工程女性大學生學習歷程之質性研究：公立教學型大學為例。科技與工程教育學刊，46(1)，31-43。  延伸查詢new window
21.高振耀(2011)。探索數理資優學生與普通生在創造思考能力上的差異。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，2011，127-151。  延伸查詢new window
22.連振杰(2009)。大學生休閒參與型態與休閒態度之研究--以南臺科技大學一年級新生為例。臺中教育大學體育學系系刊，4，22-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.蔡麗玲(2009)。在科學裡看見性別。性別平等教育季刊，46，8-10。  延伸查詢new window
24.Abraham, A.(2016)。Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature。Brain Imaging and Behavior，10(2)，609-618。  new window
25.Bateson, Patrick(2015)。Playfulness and creativity。Current Biology，25(1)，R12-R16。  new window
26.Berg, T.、Sharpe, A.、Aitkin, E.(2018)。Females in computing: Understanding stereotypes through collaborative picturing。Computer & Education，126，105-114。  new window
27.Best, D. L.(2009)。Another view of the gender-status relation。Sex Roles，61(5/6)，341-351。  new window
28.Dumas, D.、Schmidt, L. C.、Alexander, P. A.(2016)。Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design。Thinking Skills and Creativity，21，50-66。  new window
29.Glǎveanu, V. P.(2014)。Revisiting the 'art bias' in lay conceptions of creativity。Creativity Research Journal，26(1)，11-20。  new window
30.Glăveanu, V. P.(2018)。Educating which creativity?。Thinking Skills and Creativity，27，25-32。  new window
31.Hennesey, B. A.、Amabile, T. M.(2010)。Creativity。Annual Review of Psychology，61，569-598。  new window
32.Jouini, E.、Karehnke, P.、Napp, C.(2018)。Stereotypes, underconfidence and decision-making with an application to gender and math。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization，148，34-45。  new window
33.高振耀(20081200)。Socio-Emotional Issues of Mathematically Gifted Adolescent Females: Portraits of Two Cases in Taiwan。特殊教育與復健學報，19，91-111。new window  new window
34.Kaufman, J. C.(2012)。Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS)。Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts，6(4)，298-308。  new window
35.Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K.、Bianchi, G.、de Paiva, V. T.(2010)。Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education。International Technology and Design Education，20(4)，453-476。  new window
36.Moè, A.(2018)。Mental rotation and mathematics: Gender-stereotyped beliefs and relationships in primary school children。Learning and Individual Differences，61，172-180。  new window
37.Morin, S.、Robert, J.-M.、Gabora, L.(2018)。How to train future engineers to be more creative? An educative experience。Thinking Skills and Creativity，28，150-166。  new window
38.Niederle, M.、Vesterlund, L.(2010)。Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition。Journal of Economic Perspectives，24(2)，129-144。  new window
39.Oh, S. S.、Lewis, G. B.(2011)。Stemming inequality? Employment and pay of female and minority scientists and engineers。The Social Science Journal，48(2)，397-403。  new window
40.Passolunghi, M. C.、Ferreira, T. I. R.、Tomasetto, C.(2014)。Math-gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence。Learning and Individual Differences，34，70-76。  new window
41.Reis, S. M.(2001)。Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women。Creativity Research Journal，14(3)，305-316。  new window
42.Rossmann, E.、Fink, A.(2010)。Do creative people use shorter associative pathways?。Personality and Individual Differences，49(8)，891-895。  new window
43.Sawyer, R. K.(2017)。Creativity research and cultural context: Past, present, and future。The Journal of Creative Behavior，51(4)，352-354。  new window
44.Schmader, T.、Johns, M.、Barquissau, M.(2004)。The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women's experience in the math domain。Sex Roles，50(11)，835-850。  new window
45.Shi, Y.(2018)。The puzzle of missing female engineers: Academic preparation, ability beliefs, and preferences。Economics of Education Review，64，129-143。  new window
46.Kaufman, J. C.、Baer, J.(2008)。Gender differences in creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior，42(2)，75-105。  new window
47.Morse, Janice M.、Barrett, Michael、Mayan, Maria、Olson, Karin、Spiers, Jude(2002)。Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research。International Journal of Qualitative Methods，1(2)，13-22。  new window
48.Cropley, A. J.(2006)。In praise of convergent thinking。Creativity Research Journal，18(3)，391-404。  new window
49.郭靜姿、林美和、張靖卿、胡寶玉、簡維君、謝佳男、周佩蓉(20090600)。高中資優班畢業女性談資優教育之影響。特殊教育學報，29，87-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.Sternberg, Robert J.(2006)。The nature of creativity。Creativity Research Journal，18(1)，87-98。  new window
51.于曉平、林幸台(20100300)。角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，55(1)，27-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.余民寧(2008)。邁向女科學家培育之路--從國際數學與科學成就評比資料分析探索起 (計畫編號：NSC96-2522-S-004-001-MY2)。臺北市：國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Starko, A. J.(2005)。Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.Savransky, S. D.(2000)。Engineering of Creativity。Boca Raton, FL：CRC Press。  new window
3.鈕文英(2011)。教育研究方法與論文寫作。臺北：雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
4.Clark, B.(1992)。Growing up gifted。New York：Macmillan。  new window
5.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari Knopp(2007)。Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Kaufman, J. C.、Glǎveanu, V. P.、Baer, J.(2017)。The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Woolf, V.(1957)。A room of one's own。New York, NY：Harcourt Brace。  new window
8.Davis, G. A.、Rimm, S. B.(2004)。Education of the gifted and talented。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
9.張春興(2009)。現代心理學。臺北：臺灣東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。心理。  延伸查詢new window
11.鈕文英(2012)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
12.Patton, Michael Q.(2002)。Qualitative evaluation and research methods。Sage Publications。  new window
13.Riessman, C. K.(1993)。Narrative analysis-qualitative research method volune 30。London：Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brinkmann, A.、Sriraman, B.(2009)。Aesthetics and creativity: An exploration of the relationships between the constructs。Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest's 65th birthday。Charlotte, NC：Information Age。  new window
2.Cropley, D. H.、Cropley, A. J.(2005)。Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity。Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1065（臺灣：1041，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67475005
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上