:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民眾電子連署內容與政府回應方式:以提點子平臺為例
書刊名:民主與治理
作者:陳坤毅黃心怡
作者(外文):Chen, Kun-yiHuang, Hsini
出版日期:2020
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:公共政策網路參與平臺政府回應方式電子參與電子連署Join platformGovernment responsivenessElectronic participationElectronic petition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:296
期刊論文
1.Irvin, Renee A.、Stansbury, John(2004)。Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?。Public Administration Review,64(1),55-65。  new window
2.張卿卿(20100000)。臺灣選舉中的競選廣告與議題/特質所有權認知。傳播與社會學刊,11,31-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Petrocik, J. R.(1996)。Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study。American Journal of Political Science,40(3),825-850。  new window
4.Kearney, Richard C.、Sinha, Chandan(1988)。Professionalism and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conflict or Compatibility?。Public Administration Review,48(1),571-579。  new window
5.Stivers, Camilla(1994)。The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration。Public Administration Review,54(4),364-369。  new window
6.O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr.(1997)。Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration。Public Administration Review,57(1),45-52。  new window
7.王光旭(20080600)。數位民主行政與官僚回應性:民意電子信箱強化回應性認知研究初探。政策研究學報,8,77-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王光旭、陳敦源(20100600)。政務領導、國會監督與官僚自主:臺灣全民健保政策「否決者」之研究,1986~2004。行政暨政策學報,50,107-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hobolt, Sara Binzer、Klemmemsen, Robert(2005)。Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark。Political Studies,53(2),379-402。  new window
10.莊文忠、徐明莉、張鐙文(20091200)。非營利組織的議程設定與政策倡議的形成:質化研究的檢證。公共行政學報,33,121-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Vigoda, Eran(2002)。From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration。Public Administration Review,62(5),527-540。  new window
12.Bryer, Thomas A.(2007)。Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,17(3),479-500。  new window
13.黃建勲(20160700)。一樣的身分、不一樣的角色:以2008年臺灣政府文官調查庫探索文官回應與類型。文官制度季刊,8(3),81-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.蘇偉業、王敬智(20150300)。武漢「行風連線」中的公眾回應性探討:新三明治式官僚控制。中國大陸研究,58(1),103-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Fischer, Frank(1993)。Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Cases。Policy Sciences,26(3),165-187。  new window
16.蔡允棟(20010300)。官僚組織回應的概念建構評析--新治理的觀點。中國行政評論,10(2),89-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Saltzstein, Grace Hall(1992)。Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conceptual Issues and Current Research。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2(1),63-88。  new window
18.Yang, K.、Pandey, S. K.(2007)。Public Responsiveness of Government Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model。Public Performance & Management Review,31(2),215-240。  new window
19.莊文忠(20180400)。循證的政策制定與資料分析:挑戰與前瞻。文官制度季刊,10(2),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Wilson, Woodrow(1887)。The Study of Administration。Political Science Quarterly,2(2),197-222。  new window
21.Wan, Poe Yu-ze(2018)。Outsourcing Participatory Democracy: Critical Reflections on the Participatory Budgeting Experiences in Taiwan。Journal of Public Deliberation,14(1),1-20。  new window
22.張志鵬、王宏文、蔡逸敬(20170100)。從垂直課責到水平課責:以獨立性探討部長電子信箱之執行困境。文官制度季刊,9(1),95-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Andersen, P. A.、Blackburn, T. R.(2004)。An experimental study of language intensity and response rate in e mail surveys。Communication Reports,17(2),73-84。  new window
24.Boyraz, M.、Krishnan, A.、Catona, D.(2015)。Who is retweeted in times of political protest? An analysis of characteristics of top tweeters and top retweeted users during the 2011 Egyptian revolution。Atlantic Journal of Communication,23(2),99-119。  new window
25.Böhle, K.、Riehm, U.(2013)。E-petition systems and political participation: About institutional challenges and democratic opportunities。First Monday,18(7)。  new window
26.Craig, T. Y.、Blankenship, K. L.(2011)。Language and persuasion: Linguistic extremity influences message processing and behavioral intentions。Journal of Language and Social Psychology,30(3),290-310。  new window
27.Gauld, R.、Flett, J.、McComb, S.、Gray, A.(2016)。How responsive are government agencies when contacted by email? Findings from a longitudinal study in Australia and New Zealand。Government Information Quarterly,33(2),283-290。  new window
28.Godfrey, M.(2001)。What works: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services。Health & Social Care in the Community,9(6),504-505。  new window
29.Hagen, L.、Harrison, T. M.、Uzuner, Ö.、May, W.、Fake, T.、Katragadda, S.(2016)。E-petition popularity: Do linguistic and semantic factors matter?。Government Information Quarterly,33(4),783-795。  new window
30.Hamilton, M. A.、Stewart, B. L.(1993)。Extending an information processing model of language intensity effects。Communication Quarterly,41(2),231-246。  new window
31.Kim, S.、Lee, J.(2012)。E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government。Public Administration Review,72(6),819-828。  new window
32.Liao, Y.(2018)。Toward a pragmatic model of public responsiveness: Implications for enhancing public administrators' responsiveness to citizen demands。International Journal of Public Administration,41(2),159-169。  new window
33.Lindner, R.、Riehm, U.(2009)。Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective。Journal of eDemocracy and Open Government,1(1),1-11。  new window
34.Meier, K. J.、O'Toole, L. J. Jr.(2006)。Political control versus bureaucratic values: Reframing the debate。Public Administration Review,66(2),177-192。  new window
35.Miller, L.(2009)。E-Petitions at Westminster: The way forward for democracy?。Parliamentary Affairs,62(1),162-177。  new window
36.Peters, B. G.(2010)。Bureaucracy and democracy。Public Organization Review,10(3),209-222。  new window
37.Porwol, L.、Ojo, A.、Breslin, J. G.(2016)。An ontology for next generation e-Participation initiatives。Government Information Quarterly,33(3),583-59。  new window
38.Seaton, J.(2005)。The Scottish parliament and e-democracy。Aslib Proceedings,57(4),333-337。  new window
39.Walgrave, S.、Lefevere, J.、Nuytemans, M.(2009)。Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances。Political Communication,26(2),153-172。  new window
40.Wright, S.(2015)。'Success' and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions。Information, Communication & Society,19(6),843-857。  new window
41.King, Cheryl Simrell、Feltey, Kathryn M.、Susel, Bridget O'Neill(1998)。The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration。Public Administration Review,58(4),317-326。  new window
42.黃東益、蕭乃沂、陳敦源(20030900)。網際網路時代公民直接參與的機會與挑戰--臺北市「市長電子信箱」的個案研究。東吳政治學報,17,121-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hale, S. A.、Margetts, H.、Yasseri, T.(2013)。Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 downing street website。  new window
2.Osborne, D.(2007)。Reinventing government: What a difference a strategy makes。7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government。  new window
3.Tan, C.、Lee, L.、Pang, B.(2014)。The effect of wording on message propagation: Topic- and author-controlled natural experiments on Twitter。The 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics。  new window
4.Macintosh, A.(2004)。Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making。The 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,(會議日期: January 5-8, 2004)。IEEE。1-10。  new window
研究報告
1.張其祿、廖達琪(2010)。強化中央行政機關橫向協調機制之研究 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-098-003)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱雲漢、吳重禮、胡佛、俞振華、徐火炎、盛杏湲、劉義周、Haggard, S.(2012)。2009年至2012年『選舉與民主化調查』三年期研究規劃(3/3)--2012年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案 (計畫編號:NSC100-2420-H-002-030)。國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳敦源、蕭乃沂(2001)。台北市政府接受人民施政意見反應機制之研究。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖洲棚、陳敦源、廖興中(2013)。回應性政府的最後一哩路:政府公民關係管理資料加值應用之研究 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-101002)。電子治理研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞振華、蔡佳泓(2015)。測量議題競選廣告策略之效果:實驗設計在網路調查平台上的應用 (計畫編號:NSC102-2410-H-004-133)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳敦源、黃東益(2009)。運用網路進行公民連署之評估與機制設計 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-097-006)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳敦源、廖洲棚、黃心怡(2017)。政府公共溝通--新型態網路參與及溝通策略 (計畫編號:NDC105033111-4)。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡佳泓(2009)。台灣民眾之政策偏好與政治行為之多層次貝式分析(第3年) (計畫編號:NSC95-2414-H-004-047-SSS)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃紀、朱雲漢、吳重禮、俞振華、徐火炎、盛杏湲、詹大千(2016)。2012年至2016年「選舉與民主化調查」四年期研究規劃(4/4):2016年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案 (計畫編號:MOST101-2420-H-004-034-MY4)。國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
10.聯合行銷股份有限公司(2017)。106年公共政策網路參與平臺公民參與情形第一次調查報告。聯合行銷股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李臺榕(2011)。基層官僚組織回應性及其影響因素之檢證:民意電子信箱之測試(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃瀞瑩(2014)。公民電子參與及組織回應性--以政府首長電子信箱為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dahl, Robert A.(1972)。Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition。Yale University Press。  new window
2.Denhardt, Janet Vinzant、Denhardt, Robert B.(2011)。The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering。M.E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Starling, G.(2010)。Managing the public sector。Cengage Learning。  new window
4.Jones, Bryan D.、Baumgartner, Frank R.(2005)。The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems。University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.O'Leary, R.、Bingham, L. B.(2007)。A Manager's Guide to Resolving Conflicts in Collaborative Networks。Center for the Business of Government。  new window
6.Crosby, B.(2000)。Participation revisited: A managerial perspective。  new window
7.陳敦源(2012)。民主治理:公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bryan, Cathy、Tsagarousianou, Roza、Tambini, Damian(1998)。Electronic Democracy and the Civic Networking Movement in Context。Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks。Routledge。  new window
2.Macintosh, A.(2008)。E-democracy and e-participation research in Europe。Digital government: E-government research, case studies, and implementationt。Springer。  new window
3.Macintosh, A.、Malina, A.、Farrell, S.(2002)。Digital democracy through electronic petitioning。Advances in digital government: Technology, human factors, and policy。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE