:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網際網路時代公民直接參與的機會與挑戰--臺北市「市長電子信箱」的個案研究
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:黃東益 引用關係蕭乃沂 引用關係陳敦源 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Tong-yiHsiao, Nai-yiChen, Don-yun
出版日期:2003
卷期:17
頁次:頁121-151
主題關鍵詞:政治參與網際網路電子化政府人民陳情市長電子信箱Political participationWWWElectronic governmentCitizen complainsTCME
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(7) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:178
代議民主制度的實際運作往往無法兼顧平等與參與,近年來網際網路的盛行,似乎為市民的平等參與打開了一扇機會之窗。為了解網路科技對於直接參與所帶來的機會與挑戰,本研究以中華民國各級政府中最早設立的電子信箱─── 台北市「市長電子信箱」為個案,以檔案分析、市府相關業務人員自填式問卷及使用者電子郵件調查等研究方法,進行初探性研究。初步研究結果大致符合學者有關資訊傳播科技對於公民直接參與可能所造成影響的預測。資訊傳播科技直接、快速、無疆界的特性打破地域及各種社會的藩籬,提供一個自由討論的公共空間及與政府直接接觸的參與途徑。同時,資訊及網路科技大幅降低紙張印刷及資料處理成本,自動化的功能使政府得以提供更多樣、更有效率及更有回應性的服務。我們的研究結果也呼應學者對於應用網際網路於公民的直接參與可能造成的負面影響,包括政府處理負擔增加、民眾期待與現實的落差以及參與不平等等問題。本文初探性的結論對於有關於「電子化政府」或「數位民主」等領域後續通則性的研究有奠基的作用,而且當實務界人士如火如荼地應用ICTs於公司部門的運作時,本文的發現也值得深思。面對ICTs所帶來的挑戰,作者建議市府應善用知識管理技術,以減輕處理成本,公平對待不同管道的陳情案件,並降低使用網路門檻,普及網路使用,以縮小參與鴻溝。
Experience in Western countries indicates representative democracy usually sacrifices equality with participation. The prevalence of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), World Wide Web (WWW) in particular, has opened a window of opportunities for solving the dilemma in representative democracy. To explore the opportunities and challenges WWW has brought to direct participation, we utilize Taipei City Mayor’s Electronic Mail Box (TCME) as a case for investigation. In this study, we conduct documentary analysis, a self-administered survey on staffs dealing with letters sent to TCME and three electronic surveys on citizens who sent mails to TCME. Our findings are generally in line with the predictions suggested by scholars. The speediness, directness, and boundlessness of ICTs provide a free public forum and an access by which citizens can contact government agencies without mediation by parties, politicians or the legislature. By providing automation function and cutting down the cost of paper∕printing and data processing, ICTs not only enable government to extend its services but also substantially lower the cost of participation both for citizens and bureaucracy. On the other hand, our findings also show that increasing participation has overloaded the government. Easy access to Internet also breeds citizens’ unrealistic expectation toward government and deepens the digital divide. We suggest the Taipei City Government should develop knowledge management technique to lessen the load of TCME. To shorten the gap between “information haves” and “information have nots” the Taipei City Government should equally treat appeals and complains from different channels and lower the threshold to access TCME.
期刊論文
1.黃東益(20000100)。審慎思辯民調--研究方法的探討與可行性評估。民意研究季刊,211,123-143。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳愛娥(19990300)。代議民主體制是民主原則的不完美形式?--加強、補充代議民主體制的可能途徑。中央警察大學法學論集,4,17-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ho, A. Tat-Kei(2002)。Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative。Public Administration Review,62(4),434-444。  new window
4.項靖(20001000)。線上政府:我國地方政府WWW網站之內涵與演變。行政暨政策學報,2,41-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.項靖(19991200)。理想與現實:民主行政之實踐與地方政府網路公共論壇。東海社會科學學報,18,149-178。  延伸查詢new window
6.林水波、石振國(19990300)。以直接民主改革間接民主的論述與評估。立法院院聞,27(3)=311,33-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.Moon, M. Jae(2002)。The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?。Public Administration Review,62(4),424-433。  new window
8.Lijphart, Arend(1997)。Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association,1996。American Political Science Review,91(1),1-14。  new window
9.陳俊宏(19980900)。永續發展與民主:審議式民主理論初探。東吳政治學報,9,85-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳佳君(2001)。提升資訊素養消弭數位落差-「資訊社會與數位落差研討會」活動紀實。研考雙月刊,25(4),8-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉淑惠(1995)。科技的發展與直接民主。國家政策雙周刊,117,14-15。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Norris, Pippa(2000)。Democratic Divide? The Impact of the Internet on Parliamentary Worldwide。The American Political Science Association annual meeting,(會議日期: 31 August-2 September)。Washington DC。  new window
2.蕭乃沂(2001)。化民意為施政知識:智慧型政府必備的能力。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳敦源、蕭乃沂(2001)。台北市政府接受人民施政意見反應機制之研究。台北:台北市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.周繼祥、周祖誠、莊伯仲(2001)。臺北市網路族市政參與行為之研究。台北市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Crosby, Benjamin(2000)。Participation Revisited: A Managerial Perspective。Center for Democracy and Governance, United States Agency for International Development。  new window
4.黃河(2001)。臺北市政府資訊調查-臺北市民眾使用網際網路情形調查。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭乃沂、陳敦源、黃東益(2002)。轉換民眾意見為施政知識:知識管理與資料採礦的觀點。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐千偉(2000)。網際網路與公民參與:臺北市政府網路個案分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Heeks, R.、Davies, A.(1999)。Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Grossman, Lawrence K.(1995)。The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age。Viking Penguin。  new window
3.Resnick, David、Margolis, Michael(2000)。Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace 'Revolution'。Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace 'Revolution'。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
4.Morris, Dick、張志偉(2000)。網路民主。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
5.Compaine, Benjamin(2001)。The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth?。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
6.郭秋永(1993)。政治參與。臺北:幼獅。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Wallace, Patricia M.(1999)。The psychology of the internet。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Hague, Bague N.、Loader, Brian D.(1999)。Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-making in the Information Age。Routledge。  new window
9.Bellamy, Christine、Taylor, John A.(1998)。Governing in the Information Age。Philadelphia:Open University Press。  new window
10.Gates, Bill、樂為良(1999)。數位神經系統--與思想等快的明日世界。臺北:商業周刊。  延伸查詢new window
11.Osborne, David、Gaebler, Ted(1992)。Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
12.林水波(1999)。政府再造。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Barber, Benjamin R.(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。  new window
14.Elster, Jon(1998)。Deliberative Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Dryzek, John S.(1990)。Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Etzioni, Amitai(1993)。The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda。Crown Publishers。  new window
17.Norris, Pippa、Bennett, W. L.、Entman, R. M.(2001)。Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide。Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.Putnam, Robert D.(2000)。Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community。Simon & Schuster。  new window
19.Cronin, T. E.(1989)。Direct Democracy。Direct Democracy。沒有紀錄。  new window
20.Francissen, L.、Brants, K.(1998)。Virtually Going Places; Square Shopping in Amsterdam's Digital City。Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks。New York, NY。  new window
21.Korac-Kakabadse, A.、Korac-Kakabadse, N.(1999)。Information Technology's Impact on the Quality of Democracy。Reinventing Government in the Information Age。London, UK/ New York, NY。  new window
22.Lenk, K.(1999)。Electronic Support of Citizen Participation in Planning。Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-Making in the Information Age。London, UK。  new window
23.Neu, R. C.、Anderson, R. H.、Bikson, T. K.(1999)。Sending Your Government to Message: E-mail Communication between Citizens and Government。Sending Your Government to Message: E-mail Communication between Citizens and Government。Santa Monica, CA。  new window
24.Peterson, S. A.(1990)。Political Behavior: Patterns in Everyday Life。Political Behavior: Patterns in Everyday Life。CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Tsagarousianou, Roza(1998)。Electronic Democracy and the Public Sphere。Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.Dijk, van Jan(2000)。Digital Democracy: Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention。Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice。London:Thousand Oaks:Sage。  new window
3.Bryan, Cathy、Tsagarousianou, Roza、Tambini, Damian(1998)。Electronic Democracy and the Civic Networking Movement in Context。Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE