:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Appreciating English Jokes: Self-Deprecating vs Other-Deprecating
書刊名:英語語言與文學學刊
作者:廖招治
作者(外文):Liao, Chao-chih
出版日期:1999
卷期:5
頁次:頁1-14
主題關鍵詞:變異數分析t-檢定卡方檢定合作原則面子理論自嘲嘲他ANOVAt-testChi-square testCooperative maximsFace theorySelf-deprecatingOther-deprecating
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:77
     九則英語笑話呈現給臺中中興大學及逢甲大學學生,共分析一百九十二份解答,得到中國學生有一點點不喜觀自我吹噓型的笑話,較喜歡自嘲型的笑話四則中的一則。因此,幽默家老康及戴晨志的觀念「自嘲型笑話,較好」無法獲得充分的支持。中國人對笑話的欣賞與製造,也受嚴肅世界中面子理論所左右。性有關的笑話,被認定為低級,卻不見得不被欣賞。男性大抵比女性欣賞與性有關的笑話。
     Nine items of American English humor were presented to university students at National Chung Hsing University in Taichung and Feng Chia University. Among the nine, three were common items distributed to both the experimental and the control group. These three items show that both groups are roughly similar in their judgment of the funniness. The other six items had different referents for the experimental group and the control group. The university experimental group enjoyed one of the two Chinese macro self-bragging jokes marginally less than the control group enjoyed the bragging joke in the macro third person. However, the experimental group enjoy one of the four Chinese self-deprecating jokes significatly more than the control group enjoyed its counterpart from another culture. That is, Lao and Dai's concept is only weakly supported. Chinese cannot avoid the face concept even in the world of humor, which is a contrast to the serious world. The appreciation of a low-class joke might be higher than that of some high-class jokes; i.e., the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation shows the appreciation responses and the class evaluations to be independent of each other.
期刊論文
1.Titze, Michael(1996)。The Pinocchio Complex: overcoming the fear of laughter。Humor and Health Journal,5(1),1-16。  new window
2.Carrell, Amy(1997)。Joke competence and humor competence。Humor,10(2),173-185。  new window
3.廖招治(19980800)。Chinese Appreciation of English Law Humor。英語語言與文學學刊,4,13-20+89。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Goffman, Erving(1955)。On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction。Psychiatry,18(3),213-231。  new window
圖書
1.Raskin, Victor(1985)。Semantic mechanisms of humor。Semantic mechanisms of humor。Dordrecht, Holland:D. Reidel Publishing Company。  new window
2.林語堂(1974)。無所不談合集。無所不談合集。臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴晨志(1997)。你是幽默高手嗎?。臺北:China Times Publishing Co.。  延伸查詢new window
4.戴晨志(1996)。你是幽默高手嗎?。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Allan, Keith、Burridge, Kate(1991)。Euphemism and dysphemism: Language Used as shield and weapon。Euphemism and dysphemism: Language Used as shield and weapon。Oxford。  new window
6.戴晨志(1998)。Expert of encouragement。Expert of encouragement。Taipei。  new window
7.老康(1987)。Humorous life。Humorous life。Taipei。  new window
8.廖招治(1998)。Jokers, humor and Chinese people。Jokers, humor and Chinese people。Taipei。  new window
9.True, Herb(1984)。Humor power。Yo-mou jiu-shi li-liang。Taipei。  new window
其他
1.廖招治(1998)。Laughter-related Matters and Parody Appreciation for Early Teenagers in Junior High School。  new window
2.廖招治(1998)。Parody Appreciation and Humor-related Matters for Senior High School Students。  new window
圖書論文
1.Grice, H. P.(1967)。Logic and conversation。Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts。New York:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE