:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:問題行為動機量表之編製報告
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:林惠芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Hui-fen
出版日期:2001
卷期:20
頁次:頁129-145
主題關鍵詞:行為動機功能性評量問題行為智能障礙發展遲緩Behavior motivationBehavior problemsFunctional assessmentMentally retarded
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:28
     智能障礙或發展遲緩者常伴隨有不良的適應問題,這些問題行為的背後其實是具有某種複雜的溝通意義和社會功能,只有一般人不清楚而已。「問題行為動機量表」便是用來作為瞭解智能障礙或發展遲緩學生發生問題行為的可能原因。本研究是以Durand和Crimmins(1988)的「動機量表」為架構,並參考相文獻編製而成。全量表計有32題,分屬「自我刺激」、「得到他人注意」、「逃避」以及「獲得實質東西」等四個向度。因素分析結果,四向度的解釋量佔41.36%。全量表內部一致性為.89,分量表內部一致性界於.73至.92之間。相隔兩週的重測信度,全量表為.91,分量表界於.74至.94之間。前後評分完全一致性方面,試題間界於.32至.76之間,分量表界於.45至.51之間;前後評分在正負1分之間的一致性方面,試題間界於.62至.92之間;分量表界於.74至.77之間。
     The purpose of this study was to revise the Motivation Assessment Scale (Durand & Crimmins, 1988) so as to help teachers of retarded students better understand the function of behavior problems of their students. This scale consisted of 32 items with 4 factors accounted for 41.36% variances. The results showed that the revised scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α=.89 for full scale, .73 to .92 for subscales), test-retest reliability (r=.91 for full scale, .74 to .94 for subscales). The scale also had favorable item-by-item reliability.
期刊論文
1.Lennox, D. B.、Miltenberger, R. G.(1989)。Conducting a Functional Assessment of Problem Behavior in Applied Settings。The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps,14(4),304-311。  new window
2.張正芬(19971200)。自閉症兒童的行為輔導--功能性評量的應用。特殊教育季刊,65,1-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張正芬(20000600)。自閉症兒童問題行為功能之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,18,127-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Arndorfer, R. E.、Miltenberger, R. G.(1993)。Functional assessment and treatment of challenging behavior: A review with implications for early childhood。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,13,82-105。  new window
5.Arndorfer, R. E.、Miltenberg, R. G.、Woster, S. H.、Rortvedt, A. K.、Gaffaney, T.(19940100)。Home-based descriptive and experimental analysis of problem behaviors in children。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,14(1),64-88。  new window
6.Carr, E. G.(1977)。The motivation of self-injurious behaviors: A review of some hypotheses。Psychological Bulletin,84,800-816。  new window
7.Carr, E. G.(1994)。Emerging themes in the functional analysis of behavior。Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,27,393-399。  new window
8.Durand, V. M.(1987)。"Look homeward angel": A call to return to our (functional) roots。The Behavior Analyst,10,299-302。  new window
9.Durand, V. M.、Crimmins, D. B.(1988)。Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior。Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,18,99-177。  new window
10.Fowler, R. C.、Schnacker, L. E.(1994)。The changing character of behavioral assessment and treatment: A historical introduction and review of functional analysis research。Diagnostique,19,79-102。  new window
11.Talkington, L. W.、Hall, S.、Altman, R.(1971)。Communication deficits and aggression in the mentally retarded。American Journal of Mental Retardation,76,235-237。  new window
12.Tobin, T.(1994)。Recent developments in functional assessment: Implication for school counselors and psychologists。Diagnostique,19,5-28。  new window
13.Sigafoos, J.、Roberts, D.、Kerr, M.(1994)。Interrater reliability of the motivation assessment scale: failure to replicate with aggressive behavior。Research in Developmental Disabilities,15(5),333-342。  new window
14.Conroy, M. A.、Fox, James J.、Bucklin, A.、Good, W.(1996)。An Analysis of the Reliability and Stability of the Motivation Assessment Scale in Assessing the Challenge Behaviors of Persons with Developmental Disabilities。Education & Training in Mental Retardation,31,243-250。  new window
15.Poindexter, A.、Ness, M. E.、Kienlen, T. L.、Bihm, E. M.(1991)。Factor structure of the motivation assessment scale for persons with mental retardation。Psychological Reports,68,1235-1238。  new window
16.Cipani, E. C.(1995)。Be aware of negative reinforcement。Teaching Exceptional Children,27,37-40。  new window
17.Demchak, M. A.、Halle, J. W.(1985)。Motivational assessment: A potential means of enhancing treatment success of self-injurious individuals。Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded,3,25-38。  new window
18.Demchak, M. A.(1993)。Functional assessment of problem behaviors in applied settings。Intervention in School and Clinic,29,89-95。  new window
19.Ducker, P. C.、Sigaffos, J.(1998)。The motivation assessment scale: Reliability and construct validity across three topographies of behavior。Research in Developmental Disabilities,19,131-141。  new window
20.Lewis, T. J.、Scott, T. M.、Sugai, G.(1994)。The problem behavior questionnaire: A teacher-based instrument to develop functional hypotheses of problem behavior in general education classrooms。Diagnostique,19,103-115。  new window
21.Spreat, S.、Connelly, L.(1996)。Reliability of the motivation assessment scale。American Journal of Mental Retardation,100,528-532。  new window
22.Rodgers, T. A.、Iwata, B. A.、Zarcone, J. R.、Rourke, D. A.、Dorsey, M. F.(1991)。Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale: A failure to replicate。Research in Development Disabilities,12,349-360。  new window
圖書
1.Kazdin, A. E.(1982)。Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.施顯烇(1996)。嚴重行為問題的處理。嚴重行為問題的處理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Durand, V. M.(1988)。Motivational Assessment Scale。Dictionary of Behavior Assessment Techniques。New York, NY。  new window
4.Iwata, B. A.、Vollmer, T. R.、Zarcone, J. R.(1990)。The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations。Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities。Sycamore, IL:Sycamore Pub. Co.。  new window
5.LaVigna, G. W.、Donnellan, A. M.(1986)。Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies。Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE