:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主題統整教學之實施效果:臺北市一所國小的試探性研究
書刊名:慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊
作者:何縕琪
作者(外文):Ho, Yun-chi
出版日期:2002
卷期:1
頁次:頁97-133
主題關鍵詞:主題統整教學國小學生課程統整Curriculum integrationElementary school studentThematic integrated teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:10
統整教學旨在增進學生了解自己及其世界,並培養其善用知識與解決問題的能力。本研究之主題統整教學是以一個主題為中心,主要的概念學習在分科教學中進行,然後透過「統整活動」、「學習單」、「學習成長檔」的設計,把不同學科的教材或知識整合起來成為大單元的教學型態。以臺北市某國小二年級三個班級為對象,從學生(N=99)與家長(N=90)對統整活動與學習單的評價、學生對學習成長檔的評價,以及教師、家長與學生對學習表現的評價等向度,探討主題統整教學的實施效果。結果發現: 1. 在統整活動的評價方面: 學生比較喜好的統整活動為具有娛樂性和共同參與性,以及可以自己動手操作的活動;家長認為統整活動的優點是教學方式多元活潑可提升學習興趣、增進學習效果、以及親子共同參與學習。 2. 在學習單的評價方面: 學生認為學習單的題目深入有變化、可以和別人互動;不過,內容較困難、有時需要別人協助;有71%的家長表示喜歡教師所設計的學習單,其優點是內容符合學生生活經驗、提供學生獨立思考、提昇學習的效果;而家長在協助的過程中,不僅可以了解學生的學習狀況、增進親子的互動溝通,同時可以促進父母的自我充實。 3. 在學習成長檔的評價方面: 成長檔收集了學生的學習成果,整理時並不容易,也相當費時,但從整理的歷程中,學生感受到自己的成長與進步,並體會要珍惜自己的作品。 4. 在學習表現的評價方面: 在學生自評方面,學生自己覺得在寫作、數學、關心別人、與人合作、獨立、欣賞能力等向度上有進步。家長與教師則認為有50%以上的學生在語文寫作、數學解題、自然觀察、以及遵守紀律等向度上有進步。此外,與未接受主題統整教學的學生相較,學生在數學與國語科的紙筆測驗成績上沒有差異。顯示主題統整教學的實施對國語數學的成績並無負面的影響。 根據上述研究結果,研究者認為「主題統整教學」具有相當多正面的效果,適合在國小低年級實施。但是,有關統整教學對學生的概念發展,以及對不同背景學生的學習效果,仍有待更多的實證研究加以證實。
This study explores the effects of thematic integrated teaching among the second grade students from three classes in an elementary school of Taipei. The study was carried out throughout a whole semester in 1998. Some significant results have been reported by participating students and parents in the following four aspects. (a) On the assessments of integrated activity designs: Most students tend to favor the designs with the nature of entertrainment, group participation and the need of maunal operate. These teaching designs are likened mostly because they are very fun and interesting, giving the opportunity to learn, to share, to care, and to cooperate. The parents considered the integrated activity positively because in addition to significantly improving the children's learning interest and learning effect, it also provided a situation for them to learn and grow with children. (b) On the assessments of integrated homework assignments: Most students felt that the integrated homework assignments covered a wide variety of contents and multi-facets such that they have to interact with other students in order to complete the works. About 71% of the parents reported that they rated the integrated homework assignments positively because they felt these assignments have very close connections with the students' living experiences, benefited to students' ability of independent thinking, enhanced the learning effects. By participating in these activities, the parents reported a better understanding of their children's learning problems, significant increments in interaction and communication with their children. Meanwhile, it enforced the parents to fulfill. (c) On the assessments of learning portfolios: The portfolio requires the students to collate their learning products throughout the entire learning period. By finishing this assignment the students have apparently recognized their growth and progress of learning and considered their works preciously. However, this is hard and time-consuming such that it is recommended to give the assignment in the very begging of the semester. (d) On the assessments of learning effects: Most students felt improvements in writing and mathematics, cared more about others, more cooperative with others, more independent, and more appreciative of other fellow students. Parents and teachers felt more than 50% of the students have improvements in writing, problem solving, observing, and become more disciplined. While the thematic integrated teaching designs have enabled the students a better development of cognition and affection, it has to whatsoever negative impact on students' performance in Mandarin and mathematics. These findings testified to the positive sides of thematic integrated teaching and make the authors more confident to advocate for applying it to the beginning levels of students in the elementary schools. Yet, future studies are recommended to investigate its effects among all other levels of students. In addition, it is suggested to focus on how the thematic integrated teaching may benefit to students' concept development.
期刊論文
1.Kysilka, M. L.(1998)。Understanding integrated curriculum。The Curriculum Journal,9(2),197-209。  new window
2.Lapp, D.、Flood, J.(1994)。Integrating the curriculum: first steps。The Reading Teacher,47(5),416-419。  new window
3.Wiggins, Grant(1993)。Assessment: Authenticity, Context, and Validity。Phi Delta Kappan,75(3),200-208+210-214。  new window
4.Schug, M. C.、Cross, B.(1998)。The dark side of curriculum integration in social studies。The Social Studies,89(2),54-57。  new window
5.Shanahan, T.(1991)。Reading-Writing Relationships, Thematic Units, Inquiry Learning...In Pursuit of Effective Integrated Literacy Instruction。The Reading Teacher,51(1),12-19。  new window
6.Venville, G.、Wallace, J.、Rennie, L. J.、Malone, J.(1998)。The integration of science, mathematics, and technology in a discipline-based culture。School Science and Mathematics,98(6),294-302。  new window
7.黃譯瑩(1999)。打開學習的另一扇窗--「綜合活動」之探究。翰林文教雜誌,4,33-34。  延伸查詢new window
8.傅瓊慧(1998)。「主題式大單元教學活動設計」示例。教師天地,93,50-53。  延伸查詢new window
9.Beane, J.(1996)。On the shoulders of giants! The case for curriculum integration。Middle School Journal,28,6-11。  new window
10.Gardner, H.、Boix-Mansilla, V.(1994)。Teaching for Understanding--Within and Across the Disciplines。Educational Leadership,51(5),14-18。  new window
11.George, P. S.(1996)。The integrated curriculum: A reality check。Middle School Journal,28,12-19。  new window
12.Greene, L. C.(1991)。Science-centered curriculum in elementary School。Educational Leadership,49,42-51。  new window
13.James, D. C. S.、Adams, T. L.(1998)。Curriculum integration in nutrition and mathematics。Journal of School Health,68(1),3-6。  new window
14.Lederman, N. G.、Niess, M. L.(1997)。Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics?。School Science and Mathematics,97(2),57-58。  new window
15.Lonning, R. A.、DeFranco, T. C.(1997)。Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model。School Science and Mathematics,97(4),212-215。  new window
16.Morrow, L. M.、Pressley, M.、Smith, J. K.、Smith, M.(1997)。The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds。Reading Research Quarterly,32(1),54-76。  new window
17.Peters, T.、Schubeck, K.、Hopkins, K.(1995)。A thematic approach: Theory and practice at the Aleknagik school。Phi Delta Kappan,76,633-636。  new window
18.Brophy, J.、Alleman, J.(1991)。A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea。Educational Leadership,49(2),66。  new window
19.Czerniak, C. M.、Weber, W. B.、Sandmann, A. Jr.、Ahern, J.(1999)。A literature review of science and mathematics integration。School Science and Mathematics,99(8),421-430。  new window
20.Davison, D. M.、Miller, K. W.、Metheny, D. L.(1995)。What does integration of science and mathematics really mean?。School Science and Mathematics,95(5),226-230。  new window
21.Loughran, J.、Corrigan, D.(1995)。Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education。Teaching & Teacher Education,11(6),565-577。  new window
22.Mason, T. C.(199609)。Integrated curricula: Potential and problems。Journal of Teacher Education,47(4),263-271。  new window
23.Beane, J. A.(1991)。The Middle School: Natural Home of Integrated Curriculum。Educational leadership,49(2),9-13。  new window
24.Beane, J. A.(199504)。Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge。Phi Delta Kappan,76(8),616-622。  new window
25.Vars, G. F.(1991)。Integration Curriculum In Historical Perspective。Education Leadership,49(1),14-15。  new window
26.成虹飛、黃志順(19990100)。從教師成長看課程改革的意義。應用心理研究,1,69-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Wolf, Kenneth(1996)。Developing an effective teaching portfolio。Educational Leadership,53(6),34-37。  new window
會議論文
1.許信雄(1998)。課程統整。現代教育論壇:國小實施課程統整的走向,國立教育資料館主辦 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Passe, J.(1995)。Elementary School Curriculum。Wm. C. Brown Communications, Inc.。  new window
2.Pate, P. E.、Homestead, E. R.、McGinnis, K. L.(1997)。Making integrated curriculum work: Teachers, students, and the quest for coherent curriculum。New York, NY:London:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
3.李坤崇、歐慧敏(1999)。統整課程理念與實務。台北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Clarke, J. H.、Agne, R. M.(1997)。Interdisciplinary high school teaching: strategies for integrated learning。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Fogarty, R.(1991)。The mindful school: How to integrate the curricula。Skylight Publishing。  new window
6.Drake, S. M.(1993)。Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.Jacobs, Heidi Hayes(1989)。Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
8.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Floyde-Levin, R. W.(1997)。Perspectives from England on using integrated curriculum: A thematic approach to social studies(AAC 9726575)。  new window
圖書論文
1.周淑卿(1999)。論九年一貫課程的「統整」問題。九年一貫課程之展望。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉蘭(1999)。從知識論的辯證談課程發展問題--以台灣課程改革為例。教育科學的國際化與本土化。台北縣:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE