臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：工作場所同性間性騷擾所引起之爭議--Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案判決之評析
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：焦興鎧
作者(外文)：Chiao, Cing-kae
出版日期：2003
卷期：33:3
頁次：頁541-598
主題關鍵詞：工作場所性騷擾；工作場所同性間性騷擾；就業上性別歧視；性傾向歧視；一九六四年民權法第七章；Sexual harassment in the workplace；Same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace；Sex discrimination in employment；Sexual orientation discrimination；Title Ⅶ of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:61
  • 點閱點閱:89
本文之目的，是要對美國最高法院一九九八年在Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.一案之判決及其實質影響，做一詳盡之檢討評析。除緒論及結語外，全文計分四個主要部分：第一部分探討同性間性騷擾在美國所引起之就業歧視爭議。第二部分說明聯邦上訴法院各巡迴法庭對此一爭議之各項歧異判決，主要以寬嚴不等之三類判決模式來加以區分。第三部分敘述最高法院在Oncale一案之判決，對整個案件之重要事實、聯邦下級法院之判決，以及最高法院之見解均加以說明。第四部分則是評析該案判決所解決之爭議、若干待決之爭點、所衍生之論爭及雇主所應採取之因應措施等。
The purpose of this paper is to examine indepth the decision rendered by the U. S. Supreme Court in 1998 regarding the case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. In addition to the intro-ductory and concluding remarks, the contents of the paper are divided into four sections. Section One delves into employment discrimination disputes caused by same-sex sexual harassment in the workplace. Section Two examines three models of decisions made by federal circuit courts in accordance with different interpretations of the meaning of “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Section Three details the rulings of the Court in Oncale, including the facts, decisions of the lower courts, and the opinions of the Court itself. Finally, Section Four provides a critical discussion of the Oncale case, including the issues resolved, unresolved, derived and the responsive measures adopted by employers.
期刊論文
1.焦興鎧(20030300)。美國女性主義法學者對工作場所性騷擾爭議之批判。歐美研究，33(1)，57-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(20010600)。美國最高法院與工作場所性騷擾之爭議。歐美研究，31(2)，325-420。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Franke, Katherine M.(1998)。Gender, Sex, Agency and Discrimination: A Reply to Professor Abrams。Cornell Law Review，83，1245-1256。  new window
4.Calleros, Charles R.(1995)。The Meaning of 'Sex': Homosexual and Bisexual Harassment Under Title VII。Vermont Law Review，20，55-79。  new window
5.Franke, Katherine M.(1997)。What's Wrong with Sexual Harassment?。Stanford Law Review，49(4)，691-772。  new window
6.Storrow, Richard(1998)。Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claims after Oncale: Defining the Boundaries of Actionable Conduct。American University Law Review，47，677-745。  new window
7.(1996)。Footnote 55: Closing the 'Bisexual Defense' Loophole in Title VII Sexual Harassment Cases。Minnesota Law Review，80，1013-1045。  new window
8.Bernstein, Anita(1997)。Treating Sexual Harassment with Respect。Harvard Law Review，111，445-527。  new window
9.Schultz, Vicki(1998)。Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment。The Yale Law Journal，107，1683-1805。  new window
10.(1997)。Note: Same-sex sexual harassment claims: Maintaining equality under Title VII。Marquette Law Review，81，161-176。  new window
11.(1997)。Note: Same-sex sexual harassment: Sex, gender and the definition of sexual harassment under title VII。Georgia State University Law Review，13，1099-1126。  new window
12.(1997)。Note: Wrightson v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.: The Fourth circuit's 'simple logic' of same-sex sexual harassment under Title VII。North Carolina Law Review，76，306-352。  new window
13.(1998)。Note: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services Inc. and the future of Title VII sexual harassment jurisprudence。Boston College Law Review，39，937-963。  new window
14.(1999)。Note: Getting it straight: The Supreme Court expands Title VII to protect against all forms of same-sex sexual harassment。New York Law School Journal of Human Rights，51，323-354。  new window
15.(1999)。Note: Multiple masculinities: A new vision for same-sex harassment law。Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review，34，577-603。  new window
16.(1999)。Note: The importance of updating sexual harassment policies to thwart same-sex sexual harassment claims。Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal，16，481-513。  new window
17.Papish, P. J.(1996)。Homosexual harassment or heterosexual horseplay? The false dichotomy of same-sex sexual harassment law。Columbia Human Rights Law Review，28，201-234。  new window
18.Perry, S. J.、Fink, R. L.(1997)。Doe v. City of Belleville: Should the employer differentiate between horseplay and same-sex sexual harassment?。Labor Law Journal，48，749-757。  new window
19.Perry, S. J.、Fink, R. L.(1998)。Resolving the legality of same-sex sexual harassment: The case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.。Labor Law Journal，49，949-953。  new window
20.(1997)。Recent Case: A quick case for including same-sex harassment under Title VII: Quick v. Donaldson Co., 90 F. 3d 1372 (8th Cir. 1996)。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy，20，615-626。  new window
21.Robinson, R. K.、Reithel, B. J.、Franklin, G. M.(1998)。Same sex sexual harassment: The implications of Oncale v. Sundownner Offshore Services。Labor Law Journal，49，941-984。  new window
22.Spitko, E. G.(1997)。He said, he said: Same-sex sexual harassment under Title VII and the 'reasonable heterosexist' standard。Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law，18，56-97。  new window
23.Bernstein, A.(1998)。An old jurisprudence: Respect in retrospect。Cornell Law Review，83，1231-1244。  new window
24.Abrams, K.(1998)。The new jurisprudence of sexual harassment。Cornell Law Review，83，1169-1230。  new window
25.Abrams, K.(1998)。Postscript, Spring 1998: A response to Professors Bernstein and Franke。Cornell Law Review，83，1257-1268。  new window
26.Achampong, F.(1999)。The evolution of same-sex sexual harassment law: A critical examination of the latest developments in workplace sexual harassment litigation。St. John's Law Review，73，701-745。  new window
27.Anderson, C. L.(2001)。'Thinking within the box': How proof models are used to limit the scope of sexual harassment law。Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal，19，125-171。  new window
28.Bennett-Alexander, D. D.(1998)。Same-gender sexual harassment: The Supreme Court allows coverage under Title VII。Labor Law Journal，49，927-940。  new window
29.Bible, J. D.(1999)。A second generation of sexual harassment law: The Supreme Court rewrites the rules for the workplace。Labor Law Journal，50，115-129。  new window
30.Bible, J. D.(2002)。Same-Sex sexual harassment: When does a harasser act 'because of sex'?。Labor Law Journal，53，3-10。  new window
31.Blasi, S. S.(1996)。The adjudication of same-sex sexual harassment claims under Title VII。The Labor Lawyer，12，291-323。  new window
32.(1998)。Casenote: Boys can no longer just be boys: Same-sex harassment perpetrated by heterosexuals found actionable under Title VII。Southern Illinois University Law Journal，23，239-284。  new window
33.Chisholm, B. J.(2001)。The (back) door of Oncale v. Sundowner offshore services, Inc.: 'Outing' heterosexuality as gender-based sterotype。Law and Sexuality，10，239-276。  new window
34.Clapham, M. M.、Kirk, D. J.(1997)。Defining 'sex' in same-sex sexual harassment: The opinions of the federal courts。Labor Law Journal，48，535-543。  new window
35.(1997)。Comment: Filling the gaps: A comprehensive review of the debate over same-sex sexual harassment。University of Cincinnati Law Review，65，861-889。  new window
36.(2002)。Comment: Re-orienting sexual harassment: Why federal legislation is needed to cure same-sex sexual harassment law。American University Law Review，52，493-533。  new window
37.Davis, L. K.(1998)。When is same-gender sexual harassment actionable under Title VII? Fredette v. BVP Management Associates。Nova Law Review，22，559-583。  new window
38.DelPo, M. C.(2000)。The thin line between love and hate: Same sex hostile environment sexual harassment。Labor Law Journal，51，15-28。  new window
39.Drobac, J.(1999)。The Oncale opinion: A pansexual response。McGeorge Law Review，30，1269-1292。  new window
40.(1999)。Essay: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.: Perverted behavior leads to a perverse ruling。Florida Law Review，51，489-510。  new window
41.Feliu, A. G.、Fealy, E. A.(1996)。The role of 'sex' in same-sex harassment claims。Employee Relations Law Journal，21，39-60。  new window
42.George, C. M.(1998)。Because of sex: Same-sex sexual harassment claims under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964。Law and Psychology Review，22，251-269。  new window
43.Jenero, K. A.、Schrieber, P. M.(1998)。Revisiting employer sexual harassment policies in light of Oncale。Employee Relations Law Journal，24，129-144。  new window
44.Juliano, A.、Schwab, S. J.(2001)。The sweep of sexual harassment cases。Cornell Law Review，86，548-602。  new window
45.Kirk, D. J.、Clapham, M. M.(1996)。'Bagging' or 'goosing': How the courts are ruling in same-sex sexual harassment claims。Labor Law Journal，47，403-417。  new window
46.Kirk, D. J.、Clapham, M. M.(1998)。Is it just 'men behaving badly' or sexual harassment? The Supreme Court ruling on same-sex harassment。Labor Law Journal，49，954-961。  new window
47.Leonard, A. S.(1993)。Sexual orientation and the workplace: A rapidly developing field。Labor Law Journal，44，574-583。  new window
48.Manemann, M. C.(1989)。The meaning of 'sex' in Title VII: Is favoring an employee lover a violation of the act?。North-Western University Law Review，83，612-664。  new window
49.Norris, M. P.、Randon, M. A.(1993)。Sexual orientation in the workplace: Recent developments in discrimination and harassment law。Employee Relations Law Journal，19，233-245。  new window
50.(1995)。Note: Same-gender sexual harassment under Title VII: Garica v. Elf Atochem marks a step in the wrong direction。California West Law Review，32，87-127。  new window
51.(1996)。Note: Goosing, bagging and dry-humping: Foreplay or horseplay? Same-sex sexual harassment claims under Title VII: McWilliams v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors。Thurgood Marshall Law Review，21，211-243。  new window
52.(1996)。Note: Toward gender equality and understanding: Recognizing that same-sex sexual harassment is sex discrimination。Brooklyn Law Review，62，1165-1215。  new window
53.Udell, C. O.(1998)。Same-sex sexual harassment: Cutting the Gordian knot。Cordozo Women's Law Journal，4，409-453。  new window
54.Van Tol, J. E.(1991)。Eros gone awry: Liability under Title VII for workplace sexual favoritism。Industrial Relations Law Journal，13，153-182。  new window
圖書
1.焦興鎧(1997)。勞工法制之最新發展趨勢--美國勞工法論文集（二）。臺北：月旦。  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(2000)。勞工法論叢（一）。勞工法論叢（一）。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.焦興鎧(2002)。工作場所性騷擾問題與法律對策。臺北市：焦興鎧出版 ; 元照總經銷。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Lindemann, Barbara、Grossman, Paul(1996)。Employment Discrimination Law。Washington, DC：Bureau of National Affairs。  new window
5.焦興鎧(1995)。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集。臺北：月旦出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.焦興鎧(19970000)。工作場所性騷擾問題在美國所引起之法律爭議。臺北：中華民國勞資關係協進會。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院勞工委員會(2001)。美、日國際組織工作場所性騷擾論文集。美、日國際組織工作場所性騷擾論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：997（臺灣：986，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67672341
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上