臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大臺北地區母親對「兒童自主」教養信念之詮釋性研究
書刊名：國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類
作者：林慧芬 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Hui-fen
出版日期：2004
卷期：17:2
頁次：頁229-259
主題關鍵詞：兒童自主；母親教養信念；獨立；自我；深度訪談；Child rearing belief；Child-rearing practices；Autonomy；Independent；Self；Culture；In-depth interview
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:296
  • 點閱點閱:34
　　　　　本研究的目的在探討一、母親如何詮釋「兒童自主」的意義？二、母親給予孩子做決定的範疇為何？母親給孩子自主權的判準為何？三、母親之「兒童自主」的教養信念類型為何？ 本研究採用深度訪談法，在大臺北地區訪問20位母親。訪談資料由錄音帶逐字轉成文字稿，以「開放編碼」及「主題選擇編碼」進行資料分析。研究結果顯示，受訪的20位母親對「兒童自主」意義的詮釋集中在問題解決（認知層面）和生活自理（行為層面）。所有母親都認為孩子年幼時，有必要親子共寢以提供孩子較好的照顧及安全感。受訪母親認為孩子所能擁有多少自主權的判準是根據孩子的能力和所能負擔的責任作為分界，有三種類型，1. 孩子的能力不夠，大部份引導孩子做決定；2. 孩子有些能力可做決定，讓孩子在能力範圍內做選擇；3. 做決定的能力要從小訓練。 在兒童可以自主的範疇方面，母親在健康、安全、道德、常規與禮貌等領域的規範較多，孩子在個人領域（例如衣服、玩伴的選擇、遊戲的方式）有較多的決定權。對大多數的導正型母親而言，把自己的價值、經驗傳遞給下一代是不分「個人領域」與否的。針對兒童自主的教養信念，受訪母親可分為保護型、民主型、導正型、衝突型及混合型等五種類型。其中以導正型，民主、導正混合型為數最多，各佔25%。其中最具特色的導正型兒童自主教養信念意指：「為了孩子好，使之依循父母所設規範的教養行為。希望從孩子小的時候，就把孩子導向父母認為正確的成長道路。」 本研究建議在發展本土的教育課程或親職教育時，應該先了解臺灣教育文化的特質，若只將西方的教育模式複製到臺灣來，很容易流於形式的模仿，我們的社會及教育體系也容易因為缺乏足夠的經驗及條件來支撐其教育理想。
　　　　　Multicultural researchers have argued that the same concept may have different meanings in different cultures. The concept of child's autonomy is rooted in the western cultural, but not in Confucianism society like Taiwan. The purpose of this study is to explore how middle-class mothers construct the meaning of child's autonomy through their child-rearing beliefs within the social culture context of Taiwan. In other words, I discussed the mothers' child-rearing beliefs regarding the following issues: First, how do Taiwanese mothers interpret the meaning of children's autonomy? Secondly, on what ground do mothers grant autonomy to their children? And, on which domain can children make their own decisions? Thirdly, discussing the types of children rearing beliefs on children's autonomy. The mothers interpreted the competence of problem solving and self-care as the main meanings of children's autonomy. They reported infant and toddlers can gain a sense of security by bed-sharing with their parents. The results also indicate that the mothers treat health, security, ethics, and manners as issues that they should control while they let their children decide their own personal events. However, for the child's best interests, the mothers tend to give directions to guide their children on making decisions in personal domain. Five types of parenting styles based on mother's child rearing beliefs on children's autonomy were identified. The narrative account of these mothers can provide a framework to further develop indigenous perspective for child-rearing culture in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Choi, Keum-Hyeong(2002)。Psychological separation-individuation and adjustment to college among Korean American students: The roles of collectivism and individualism。Journal of Counseling Psychology，49(4)，468-475。  new window
2.呂俊甫(19920300)。美國人的獨立性格。美國月刊，7(3)=71，123-128。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kagitcibasi, C.(1989)。Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change。Cross-cultural perspectives, Nebraska Symposium Motivation，37，135-200。  new window
4.Lopez, F. G.(1995)。Attachment theory as an integrative framework for family counseling。Family Journal，3(1)，11-18。  new window
5.Nucci, L. P.、Weber, E. K.(1995)。Social interaction in the home and the development of young children's conceptions within the personal domain。Child Development，66，1438-1452。  new window
6.Nucci, L.、Smetana, J. S.(1996)。Mothers' concepts of young children's areas of personal freedom。Child Development，67(4)，1870-1887。  new window
7.O'Reilly, J. P.、Tofiino, K. A.、Ebata, A. T.(1986)。Cultural difference between American of Japanese and European ancestry in parental valuing of social competence。Journal of Comparative Family Studies，17，87-97。  new window
8.Raeff, C.(1997)。Individuals in relationships: Cultural values, children's social interactions, and the development of an American individualistic self。Developmental Review，17(3)，205-238。  new window
9.Slote, W. H.(1992)。Oedipal ties and the issues of separation-individuation in traditional Confucian societies。Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis，20，435-453。  new window
10.Smetana, J. G.(1994)。Parenting Styles and beliefs about parental authority。New Directions for Child Development，66，21-36。  new window
11.Stein, Martin T.、Colarusso, Calvin A.、McKenna, James J.、Powers, Nancy G.(2001)。Cosleeping (bedsharing) among infants and toddlers。Pediatrics，107(4)，873-878。  new window
12.許文耀、呂嘉寧(1998)。情緒自主、依附型態與與自殺危險性的關係。中華心理衛生學刊，11(2)，59-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Aldwin, C.、Greenberger, E.(1987)。Cultural differences in the predictors of depression。American Journal of Community Psychology，15，789-813。  new window
14.Dien, D.(1992)。Gender and individuation: China and the West。Psychoanalytic Review，79，105-119。  new window
15.Morelli, G. A.、Rogoff, B.、Oppenheim, D.(1992)。Cultural variation in infants' sleeping arrangements: Questions of independence。Developmental Psychology，28(4)，604-613。  new window
16.Okagaki, L.、Sternberg, R. J.(1993)。Parental beliefs and children's school performance。Child Development，64，36-56。  new window
17.Smetana, J. G.(1989)。Adolescents' and parents' reasoning about actual family conflict。Child Development，60，1052-1067。  new window
18.Tang, N. M.(1992)。Some psychoanalytic implications of Chinese philosophy and child-rearing practices。Psychoanalytic Study of the Child，47，371-389。  new window
19.Hoffman, J. A.(1984)。Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents。Journal of Counseling Psychology，31(2)，170-178。  new window
20.Ryan, R. M.、Lynch, J. H.(1989)。Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood。Child Development，60(2)，340-357。  new window
21.Steinberg, L.、Silverberg, S. B.(1986)。The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence。Child Development，57(4)，841-851。  new window
22.林惠雅(19990900)。母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(2)：問卷編製與相關分析。應用心理研究，3，219-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.林文瑛、王震武(19950200)。中國父母的教養觀：嚴教觀或打罵觀？。本土心理學研究，3，2-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.黃光國(19991200)。也談「人情」與「關係」的構念化。本土心理學研究，12，215-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Chao, Ruth K.(1995)。Chinese and European American cultural models of the self reflected in mothers' childrearing beliefs。Ethos，23(3)，328-354。  new window
會議論文
1.高敬文(1995)。海峽兩岸幼兒家長教養觀之比較。幼兒教育學術研討會。國立屏東師院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林慧芬(1999)。幼兒教師教育觀詮釋性研究 (計畫編號：NSC882413H158002)。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫世維(19980600)。大學生的分離-個體化與相關家庭因素 (計畫編號：NSC 85-2413-H-005A-001)。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Windell, J.、龔育美(1998)。如何教養固執的孩子。台北：遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.林玉體(1990)。一方活水--學前教育思潮。台北：信誼出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.熊秉真(1995)。傳統中國的襁褓之道。台北：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bios, P.(1979)。Adloescentpassage: Development issues。NY：International University Press。  new window
5.Ferber, R.(1986)。Solve your child's sleep problems。New York：Simon & Schuster。  new window
6.Hetherington, E. M.、Parker, R. D.(1999)。Child psychology: A contemporary veiwpoint。McGraw-Hill college。  new window
7.Miller, J. B.、Jordan, J. V.、Kaplan, A. G.、Stiver, I. P.、Surrey, J. L.(1991)。Some misconceptions and reconnections of a relational approach。Wellesley, MA：Stone-Center, Wellesley College。  new window
8.Spock, B.(1963)。The striving for autonomy and regressive object relationships. Psychoanalytic Study of the child。New York：International University Press。  new window
9.Stevenson, H. W.、Stigler, J. W.(1992)。The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education。New York：Touchtone Simon & Schuster。  new window
10.孫隆基(1993)。中國文化的深層結構。台北市：香港：唐山：集賢社。  延伸查詢new window
11.魏美惠(1995)。近代幼兒教育思潮。台北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Damon, William(1983)。Social and personality development:Infancy through adolescence。New York：Norton。  new window
13.Seidman, Irving E.(1991)。Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
14.Stern, D. N.(1985)。The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology。Basic Books。  new window
15.Mahler, M. S.、Pine, F.、Bergman, A.(1975)。The Psychological birth of the human infant。New York：Basic Books。  new window
16.Youniss, James、Smollar, Jacqueline(1985)。Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The Interpretation of Culture。New York：Basic Books。  new window
18.Erikson, Erik H.(1950)。Childhood and Society。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
19.翁麗芳(1998)。幼兒教育史。心理。  延伸查詢new window
20.Erikson, Erik Homburger(1968)。Identity: Youth and crisis。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
21.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research。Aldine。  new window
22.費孝通、劉豪興(1985)。鄉土中國。北京：生活．讀書．新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.黃光國，張素鳳，陳淑惠，楊康臨，陳若璋(2000)。華人的關係主義與憂鬱症。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lenskyj, H.(1977)。Participation observation: Chinese mothers and children at Rhodes avenue English classes(ED 189864)。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊中芳(1990)。試論中國人的「自己」：理論與研究方向。中國人•中國心--人格與社會篇。台北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lee, J. C.、Cynn, V. E. H.(1991)。Issues in counseling 1.5 generation Korean Americans。Multicultural issues in counseling: New approaches to diversity。Alexandria, VA：American。  new window
3.Nucci, L. P.、Killen, M.、Smetana, J. G.(1996)。Autonomy and the personal: Negotiation and social reciprocity in adult-child social exchanges。Children's autonomy, social competence, and interactions with adults and other children: Exploring connections and consequences。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Farver, J. M.(1999)。Activity setting analysis: model for examining the role of culture in development。Children's engagement in the world。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.LeVine, R. A.(1980)。Anthropology and child development。Anthropological perspectives on child development。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Wu, D. Y. H.(1996)。Chinese childhood socialization。The Handbook of Chinese psychology。Hong Kong：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Sigel, I. E.(1985)。A conceptual analysis of beliefs。Parental belief system: The psychological consequences for children。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.余德慧(1990)。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。中國人中國心：人格與社會篇。台北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Maccoby, E. E.、Martin, J. A.(1983)。Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction。Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1063（臺灣：1059，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67767630
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上