:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:海峽兩岸中、小學生創造思考之比較:班級及家庭創造氣氛之分析
書刊名:教育經營與管理研究集刊
作者:汪榮才
作者(外文):Wang, Jung-tsai
出版日期:2005
卷期:1
頁次:頁1-50
主題關鍵詞:班級氣氛家庭氣氛創造表現Creative performanceClassroom climateFamily climate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:8
本研究主要在比較海峽兩岸中、小學生之班級氣氛,家庭氣氛及創造表現並分析班級氣氛及家庭氣氛與學生創造表現的關係。本研究之受試者為台南市及南京市320名小學六年級學生及246名初中三年級學生。他們均需接受由研究者所發展的「家庭創造氣氛量表」、及「班級創造氣氛量表」,「中、小學生自然科學創造性問題解決測驗」、「中、小學生自然科學創造性問題解決作業單」,並經由晤談以深入了解其對班級氣氛及家庭氣氛之知覺。 本研究之結果如下: 1.兩岸中、小學生對班級氣氛之知覺輕微地受到地區與年級之交互作用的影響,唯其關聯強度不高,均傾向知覺到較多的正向班級氣氛,較少的負向班級氣氛。 2.兩岸中、小學生對家庭氣氛之知覺無顯著差異,均傾向知覺到較多的正向家庭氣氛,較少的負向家庭氣氛。 3.兩岸中、小學生對班級氣氛之知覺類型大部分相似,小部分不同。 4.兩岸中、小學生對家庭氣氛之知覺類型大部分相似,小部分不同。 5.兩岸中、小學生之創造表現在創造力測驗上有些微的差異,但在實作評量上無顯著差異。 6.兩岸中、小學生對班級及家庭氣氛之知覺與創造表現有低、中度的顯著相關。
The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in students' creative performance, classroom climate and family climate perceived by students across the strait and to explore the relationships of classroom climate and family climate to students' creative performances. The subjects were 320 6th grade students and 246 9th grade students in Tainan and Nanking. The "Family Creative Climate Inventory", the "Classroom Creative Climate Inventory", the "Creative Science Problem Solving Test" and the "Creative Science problem Solving homework Sheets" were conducted. An interview with some students on their perception to the family climate and classroom climate was conducted. Their responses were tape recorded and transcribed into verbatim protocols. The transcribed protocols were analyzed and interpreted. The results indicated: 1. The students' perceptions of classroom climate were statistically and significantly influenced by the interaction of areas and grades. However, the strength of association was trifling, and the statistical differences could be negligible. 2. There were no significant differences in students' perceptions of family climate between Taiwan and mainland china. 3. Most of the students' perception patterns of classroom climate were similar between Taiwan and mainland China. 4. Most of the students' perception patterns of family climate were similar between Taiwan and Mainland China. 5. There were statistically significant differences in students' divergent thinking scores between Taiwan and Mainland China. However, the strength of association was trifling, and the statistical differences could be negligible. There were no significant differences in students' performance scores on the "Creative Problem Sloving Homework Sheets" between Taiwan and Mainland China. 6. Students' perceptions of classroom climate and family climate were significantly correlated with students' creative performance in Taiwan and Mainland China.
期刊論文
1.Harris, D. G.、Blank, S. S.(1983)。A comparative study: Two approaches to enhance creative problem-solving in grade five students。B. C. Journal of Special Education,7(2),129-152。  new window
2.賈馥茗(19710600)。數學(題解)創造能力發展之實驗研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,13,1-78。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪榮才、蘇清守、劉緬懷(2003)。海峽兩岸中、小學生創造思考之比較: 創造表現與創造歷程。國立台南師範學院國民敎育硏究所國民敎育研究集刊,9,1-70。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭生玉(1985)。敎師間接與直接行爲和學童創造力及學業成績之關係。敎育心理學報,18,57-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Amabile, T. M.、Hennessey, B. A.、Grossman, B. S.(1986)。Social influences on creativity: The effects of eontracted-for reward。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50,14-23。  new window
6.Dacey, J. S.(1989)。Discriminating characteristics of families of high creativeadolescents。Fourth Quarter,23(4),263-271。  new window
7.Houtz, J. C.、Denmark, R. M.(1983)。Student perception of cognitive classroom structure and development of creative thinking and problem solving skills。Educational Research Quarterly,8(3),20-26。  new window
8.Kruglanski, A. W.、Friedman, I.、Zeevi, G.(1971)。The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance。Journal of Personality,39,606-617。  new window
9.Lepper, M.、Greene, D.、Nisbett, R.(1973)。Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustifkation" hypothesis。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,28,129-137。  new window
10.Litterst, J. H.、Eyo, B. A.(1993)。Developing classroom imagination: Shaping and energizing a suitable climate for growth, discovery, and vision。Journal of Creative Behavior,27,270-282。  new window
11.Shapiro, St(1993)。Strategies that create a positive classroom climate。Clearing House,67(2),91-97。  new window
12.Wodtke, K. H.、Wallen, N. E.(1965)。The Effects of Teacher Control in The Classroom on Pupils' Creativity-Test Gains。American Educational Research Journal,2,75-82。  new window
13.Withall, J.(1949)。The development of a techique for the measurement of social-emotional climate in classroom。Journal of Experim ental Education,17,347-361。  new window
14.Steele, J. M.、House, E. R.、Kerins, T.(1971)。An instrument for assessing instructional climate through few inference student judgments。American Educational Research Journal,8,447-466。  new window
15.Arter, J. A.、Spandel, V.(1992)。Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,11(1),36-44。  new window
16.Weisburg, P. S.、Springer, K. J.(1961)。Environmental factors in creative function。Archives of General Psychiatry,5(6),554-564。  new window
17.Rhodes, M.(1961)。An analysis of creativity。The Phi Delta Kappan,42(7),305-310。  new window
18.Amabile, T. M.(1982)。Social Psychology of Creativity: a Consensual Assessment Technique。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43(5),997-1013。  new window
研究報告
1.汪榮才(1995)。國民小學社會科創造性問題解決敎學效果之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 84-2413-H-024-007)。台南:國立台南師範學院國民敎育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃麗貞(1986)。社會科創造思考教學對國小兒童創造思考能力及社會科學業成就之影響(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾繁鈞(2001)。社會科創造性問題解決教學對國小兒童創造性、問題解決能力及社會科學業成就之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑絹(1991)。創造性問題解決訓練課程對高中學生創造能力、科學能力及科學相關態度的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張嘉芬(1997)。國小高年級學生依附風格、創意教養環境與創造行為之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅一萍(1996)。父母的傳統性、現代性、管教方式與兒童的創造力相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳宗逸(1995)。家庭背景、教師行為、制握信念與國小學童創造思考相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.張志豪(2000)。高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成效之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳龍安(1991)。智能結構理論在國語科創造思考敎學的應用。台北:台北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光雄(1983)。培養國小資優兒童自然學科創造能力敎學之實驗研究。新竹:新竹專特敎中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Flanders, N. A.(1970)。Analyzing Teacher Behavior。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
4.陳龍安(1988)。數學動動腦:創造思考敎學研究。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅成昌(1994)。創造敎育的理論與實踐。成都:四川敎育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fraser, B. J.、Anderson, G. J.、Walberg, H. J.(1982)。Assessment of learning environment: M anual for learning environment inventory (LEI) and my class inventory (MCI)。Australia:Western Australian。  new window
7.Macdonald, J. B.、Zaret, E.(1969)。A study of openness in classroom interactions。Freedom to learn。Columbus OH:Merrill。  new window
8.Soar, R. S.(1966)。An integrative approach to classroom learning。Philadelphia:Temple University。  new window
9.Moos, R. H.、Trickett, E. J.(1974)。Classroom environment scale manual。Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
10.Guilford, J. P.(1967)。The nature of human intelligence。McGraw-Hill。  new window
單篇論文
1.Hyson, M. C.(1989)。The classroom practices inventory: An observation instrum ent based on NAEYC's guidelines for devclopm cntally appropriate practices for 4 and 6 year old children(ED310858)。  new window
圖書論文
1.田國英、閔秀英(2000)。小學生創造思維能力培養的心理硏究。創造敎育你行我也行。北京:北京敎育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mooney, R. L.(1963)。A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to theidentification of creative talent。Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development。New York:Wiley。  new window
3.Rogers, C. R.(1962)。Toward a theory of creativity。A sourcebook for creative thinking。New York:Scribner's。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE