:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師批評的現況與改進
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:張煌熙
作者(外文):Chang, George H.
出版日期:2000
卷期:8
頁次:頁181-217
主題關鍵詞:教師批評教室溝通潛在課程初等教育Teacher criticismClassroom communicationHidden curriculumElementary education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:668
  • 點閱點閱:21
教師批評是評鑑的方式之一,教師透過評鑑可以提供學生必要的回饋。由於教師在學生的心目中屬於「重要的他人」,教師批評對學生具有重要的意義。然而,因為教師批評學生的方式有所不同,教師批評可能助長或妨礙學童的發展。遺憾的是,對於我國學校教師批評的現況,我們並沒有太多的認識。 為求彌補此一認知缺憾,本研究目的在於探討國小教師批評的現況與改進。透過參與觀察、焦點團體座談、學校訪視與唔談等方法,本研究從一百多位國小教師的教學與瞎談討論過程中蒐集質的資料。此外,本研究又以問卷調查的方式,從兩千多位國小學童的填答內容取得量的資料。隨後,再就所蒐集的相關資料進行分析與歸納。 本研究的主要發現如下: 一、國小教師批評學生的主要情境在於「非課業層面」。換言之,國小教師較容易從生活常規、秩序、整潔、禮儀等方面,對學生進行批評。 二、國小教師對學生行為的批評,主要在於「非課業層面、不可取的行為」類型,其次是「課業層面、可取的行為」,「課業層面、不可取的行為」,最後才是「非課業層面、可取的行為」等類型。 三、國小教師每天對學生批評的次數約的40~60次。若以每學年上課200天來推估,國小學生於六年的就學期間,接受教師批評的次數高達48,000~72,000次。 四、國小教師對學生的負向批評遠多於正向批評。這似乎顯示出,國小教師批評的品質仍大有改善的空間。 五、教師批評對象,學生知覺以「全班」為最多;但教師知覺則以「個別學生」為最多。教師與學生的知覺,在此有所不同。 六、國小教師並非只在「上課時間」才會批評學生。事實上,教師對學生的批評在上學的每一天,隨時都能發生。生倫時間、作業指導時間、早自習、以及放學整隊時,都是教師批評學生的尖峰時段。 最後,本研究根據上述發現進行討論,並就教師批評品質的改進提供參考建議。
Teacher criticism is a form of evaluation through which teachers provide their students with necessary feedback. Since teachers serve as "significant others" to their students, teacher criticism carries much weight in children's mind. Depending on the ways that teachers give criticism to their students, however, teacher criticism may help or hinder children's development. Regrettably, there appears to be little knowledge regarding the realities of teacher criticism in our schools. To remedy the situation, the study is intended to fill the knowledge gap by examining the realities of teacher criticism in elementary schools. Qualitative data were collected from more than one hundred teachers by employing methods such as participant observation, focus-group discussion, site visit and interview. Quantitative data were collected from more than two thousand children by questionnaire survey. The collected data were then analyzed and summarized. The major findings were as follows: Elementary school teachers tend to criticize their students more in the context of non-academic domain than those of academic domain. In other words, teachers are more likely to criticize their students in the areas such as daily disciplines, classroom orders, routine cleanings, and basic manners. Elementary school teachers tend to criticize their students more on the type of "non-academic, undesirable behavior" than the other types of students' behavior such as "the academic, desirable behavior", "the academic, undesirable behavior", and "the non-academic, desirable behavior". It is estimated that elementary school teachers in average criticize their students 40 ~ 60 times a day. Assuming that there are two hundred school days in an academic year, elementary students may encounter approximately 48,000 ~ 72,000 times of criticism from their teachers in six elementary schooling years. Elementary school teachers tend to criticize their students negatively rather than positively. It appears that the quality of teacher criticism still leaves much room for improvement. Elementary school teachers and students differ in their responses to the question "Whom did the teachers criticize. more often?". Elementary students tend to perceive "the whole class" as the answer, while the teachers tend to perceive "individual students" as their target of criticism. "In class period" does not seem to be the only time that elementary school teachers would criticize their students. In fact, teacher criticism toward students may occur anytime during the school day. Moral teaching periods, seat work periods, morning study periods, and forming home-bound teams after school day appear to be the high time for teachers to criticize their students. Based on such findings, the implications of the study were discussed and the recommendations for advancing the quality of teacher criticism were also proposed.
期刊論文
1.莊明真(1995)。變通性評量。康橋教研學會雜誌,19,4。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sadker, D.、Sadker, M.(1985)。Is the O. K. classroom O. K.?。Phi Delta Kappan,20(4),358-361。  new window
3.林進山(19960400)。開放教育下自由學校的「評量」方式與應用。國民教育,36(4),67-71。  延伸查詢new window
4.張清濱(19960600)。多元化的教學評量。研習資訊,13(3),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃秀文(19960600)。從傳統到變通:教學評量的省思。國民教育研究學報,2,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Brophy, J.、Good, T.(1970)。Teachers’ communication of differential expectations for children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data。Journal of Educational Psychology,61,365-374。  new window
7.Weinstein, R. S.(1982)。Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment in open and traditional classrooms。Journal of Educational Psychology,74(5),678-692。  new window
8.李毓娟(19951000)。學習評量的新趨勢--專訪國立臺灣師範大學教務長 簡茂發教授。教育研究月刊,45,9-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.孫仲山、李碧娟(19970700)。國民中學教學情境中師生語言行為的分析。教育研究資訊,5(4),89-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃政傑(19860600)。潛在課程概念評析。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,左163-182。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭生玉(19850600)。教師的間接與直接影響行為和學童創造力及學業成績之關係。教育心理學報,18,57-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Frederick, B.(1989)。How teachers inadvertently reinforce negative behavior of elementary school students through negative communication。the Research Colloquia, Issues in Education。  new window
2.Lynch, P. D.(1984)。Psychological abuse of children: Implications for malpractice and dismissals of teachers。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。  new window
3.Gable, R. A.、Hendrick, J. M.、Young, C. C.(1983)。Naturalistic observation of teacher verbal behavior in class for learning and behavior disordered。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Chicago, IL.。  new window
4.Smith, C. M.(1984)。Verbal behavior and classroom practice。International Conference on Thinking。  new window
研究報告
1.李富言(1986)。成敗經驗與教師歸因語言對兒童自我效能、抱負水準與作業成就之影響。  延伸查詢new window
2.張煌熙(1997)。國小教師批評與相關因素之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 85-2413-H-133-004)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉思量(1973)。教師評語對學生自我概念和學業成就之影響(碩士論文)。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張芬芬(1991)。師範生教育實習中潛在課程之人種誌研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.徐蓓蓓(1983)。教師個人特質、師生口語互動與學生對教師行為的知覺、學生學業成就之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐用生(1990)。我國國民小學社會科「潛在課程」分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳伯璋(1995)。潛在課程研究。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ginott, H.(1972)。Teacher and child。New York:Macmillan。  new window
3.王淑俐(1994)。教育高招1000。臺北市:南宏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.多湖輝(1987)。怎樣責備孩子。臺北市:台視文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.吉諾特、許麗玉(1994)。老師怎樣跟學生說話。臺北市:大地出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.笙鐸(1994)。怎樣批評別人。臺北:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.雷佩珍(1992)。批評的學問。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Flanders, N. A.(1970)。Analyzing teaching behavior。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
9.Good, T. L.、Brophy, J. E.(1984)。Looking in classrooms。New York:S. F. Ca:Harper & Row。  new window
10.Gordon, T.(1989)。Teaching children self-discipline。N. Y.:Macmillan。  new window
11.Jacobsen, D.、Eggen, P.、Kauchak, D.(1993)。Methods for teaching: A skills approach。N.Y.:Macmillan。  new window
12.張玉成(1984)。教師發問技巧。臺北市:心理出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gordon, Thomas、歐申談(1993)。教師效能訓練。台北縣三重市:新雨出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.教育部(1993)。國民小學導師手冊。臺北市:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Jackson, Philip W.(1968)。Life in Classrooms。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
16.吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳奎熹(1990)。教育社會學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃政傑(1993)。課程教學之變革。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
19.孫敏芝(1989)。教師期望與師生交互作用:一個國小教室的觀察。高雄復文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE