:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:遲滯型高科技風險社會下之典範鬥爭:以換發身分證按捺指紋案為分析
書刊名:政治與社會哲學評論
作者:周桂田 引用關係張淳美
作者(外文):Chou, Kuei-tienChang, Chun-mei
出版日期:2006
卷期:17
頁次:頁127-215
主題關鍵詞:風險論述典範鬥爭技術官僚全民指紋資料庫自我隱匿無知遲滯風險文化結構簡單的現代反身的現代Risk discoursesParadigm conflictTechnocratsCitizen fingerprint databaseSelf-concealmentUnawarenessDelayed risk culture structureSimple modernAnd reflexive modern
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:116
  • 點閱點閱:53
本文從科技風險不確定性觀點,透過相關歷史事件脈絡之論述分析整理,針對2005( 民94 ) 年換發國民身分證按接指紋引發的爭議,提出了長達十餘年整體社會系統風險論述典範的鬥爭討論。 我們區分兩組風險論述競賽。第一組論述是以生物特徵與數位科技系統的安全確定性為基礎,強調治安與效率論述,為一組「簡單的現代」(simple modem)的生產邏輯,以線性因果的思維認為科技系 統的可控制性 ( 可確實保密、儲存 )、可彌補性 ( 為了治安犧牲一點點人權也是值得 )、與可回復性 ( 即使資料外洩名譽仍可回復 );第二組論述站在科技系統的不確定性典範上,強調生物特徵與數位科技系統無論在儲存、複製、保密上的高度不確定性,本文以「反身的現代」( reflexive modem ) 分析其強調對科技系統的不確定性所將造成的侵犯隱私權、資料外洩、商業犯罪、社會歧視等批判性風險觀點。 同時,從民調上民軍支持建立指紋資料庫的現象,本文提出了建構性的批判解釋。指出在風險具有指涉未來的意義下,公眾對治安利益的未來性感知較為清晰,相對的,由於風險知識鴻溝,公眾對於生物特徵數位科技所將衍生的巨大社會風險較為模糊,因而在利益與風險選擇上傾向前者。然而這種認知型態卻構成了自我隱匿、遲滯處理風險的現象,演變為隱匿、無知下的個人選擇。另一方面,同樣也在風險知識鴻溝的門檻下,技術官僚工具性的推動簡單化的、單面利益論述的指紋資料庫政策,掩蓋了該項科技系統複雜性的風險問題,造成科技決策者隱匿、遲滯風險的存在,本文稱之為制度性的隱匿與遲滯風險。然而,這些現象已辯證性的形成一種在地社會特殊的文化結構,造成了我國對新興科技風險不確定性之典範轉移的社會困境。
Based on the viewpoint of technological uncertainty, this artic1e presents risk discourse paradigms over the past decade through analyzing development contexts of the issue “new ID card application with fingerprint submission” in 2005. Related risk discourses can be divided into two groups. Based on safety and certainty of bio-feature and digital technology system, Discourse Group (1) emphasizes public security and efficiency. It can also be categorized as the production logic of “simple modern” ,which follows the thoughts of liner causality and believes in the controllability (able to be kept confidential and restored), amend ability (worthy to sacrifice a bit of human right for public security), and recoverability (able to rebuild personal reputation even suffer from information divulgence) of technological system. On the contrary, based on the paradigm of technological uncertainty, DiscourseGroup (11) emphasizes the highly uncertainty of restoring, duplicating, and debriefing information of bio­feature and digital technology system. By applying the theory of “reflexive modern” ,this article analyzes critical risk concerns such as privacy infringement, information divulgence, commercial commitments, and social discrimination resulted from technological uncertainty. From survey observations, it showed that the public hold supportive attitudes towards establishment of Citizen Fingerprint Database. For this, the article presents a critical explanation - comparing benefits (technologica1 development and public security) with social risk (human right and discrimination), the public may perceive more of the former because they expect such benefits will concretely promote pubic security and eliminate crimes. On the other hand, the public perceive less of abstract social risks. More, due to limitation on knowledge gap of risk, technocrats make use of this to promote Citizen Fingerprint Database policy which is being simplified and with unilateral benefit discourses. Risk problems stemmed from technological complexity are concea1ed as well. Such perception pattern therefore forms delayed and hidden risk handling attitudes then develops into individual decisions being made under concealment and unawareness. Hence, a phenomenon that technological policy decision makers conceal risks shaped, as we proposed, this is “institutional delayed and hidden risk culture” Yet, these features have been dialectically become the distinct cultura1 structure embedded in local society. Eventually, uncertainty to emerging technological risks resulted in socia1 dilemmas caused by such paradigm shift.
期刊論文
1.Rose, Nikolas、Miller, Peter(1999)。What is post normal science?。Futures,31(7),647-653。  new window
2.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.周桂田(20031200)。從「全球化風險」到「全球在地化風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考。臺灣社會學刊,31,153-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田(20050600)。知識、科學與不確定性--專家與科技系統的「無知」如何建構風險。政治與社會哲學評論,13,131-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Inaba, M.、Macer, DRJ.(2003)。Attitudes to Biotechnology in Japan in 2003。Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics,13,78-89。  new window
7.Lau, C.(1989)。Risikodiskurse。Sozialw Welt,3,418-436。  new window
8.Luhmann, Niklas(1991)。Verstädigung über Risiken und Gefahren。Die politische Meinung。  new window
9.Miller, M.(1992)。Discourse and Morality。Archives européennes de sociologie,33(1),3-38。  new window
研究報告
1.Eder, K.(2002)。Life Sciences in European Society - European Commission Research Contract QLG7-CT-1999-00286。0。  new window
2.Gaskell, G.、Allum, N.、Stares, Sally(2003)。Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0。0。  new window
學位論文
1.周桂田(1999)。網際網路上之風險論述-反基因食品運動,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bernstein, Peter L.(1998)。Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk。John Wiley & Sons Inc.。  new window
2.Hobbes, Thomas(1651)。Leviathan。  new window
3.Lubmann, Niklas、Whobrey, William(1998)。Observations on Modernity。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Eder, K.(1996)。The Social Construction of Nature。London, UK:SAGE。  new window
5.Beck, Ulrich(1999)。World Risk Society。Polity Press。  new window
6.Hacking, Ian(1990)。The Taming of Chance。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Beck, Ulrich、Ritter, Mark A.(1997)。The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order。Cambridge, Mass:Polity Press。  new window
8.Douglas, Mary、Wildavsky, Aaron(1982)。Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers。University of California Press。  new window
9.Luhmann, Niklas(1993)。Risk: A Sociological Theory。Walter de Gruyter Press。  new window
10.Beck, Ulrich(1986)。Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in einen andere Moderne。Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp。  new window
11.Marx, Karl、Fernbach, David(1992)。Capital: A critique of Political Economy。Penguin Classics。  new window
12.Delanty, Gerard(1999)。Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of Modernity。Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of Modernity。Cambridge, UK:Polity Press。  new window
13.Giddens, A.(1999)。Runaway World。Runaway World。0。  new window
14.Rayner, S.、Cantor, R.(1998)。How Fair is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice。The Earthscan reader in Risk and Modern Society。0。  new window
15.Strydom, Piet(2000)。Discourse and Knowledge: the Making of Enlightenment Sociology。Liverpool:Liverpool University Press。  new window
16.Wynne, B.(1989)。Building Public Concern into Risk Management。Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis, and Management。London, UK/ New York, NY。  new window
單篇論文
1.李學養,許舜欽,項潔,湯耀中,歐陽明(1998)。從資訊技術觀點,論國民卡不需要、不安全且不可行,http://nature.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~nonid/analysis_paper/a030.html。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.劉靜怡(1998)。國民卡熱烈決標,資訊社會夢魘悄然降臨,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.消費者文教基金會(2004)。個人資料外洩案,消保會應出面為消費者求償!,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.王大為,何建明,黃世昆,莊庭瑞,陳正然,劉靜怡(1998)。不信良知喚不醒:我們針對國民卡計畫提出的共同呼籲,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.王大為,黃世昆,莊庭瑞(1998)。我們對「國民卡」的看法及建議,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊紀婷(2002)。臺灣將走上「老大哥」集體監控人民之路,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Van den Daele, Wolfgang(1992)。Scientific Evidence and the Regulation of Technical Risks: Twenty Years of Demythologizing the Experts。The Culture and Power of Knowledge。Berlin:Walter de Gruyter & Co。  new window
2.Eder, K.(1995)。Die Institutionslidirrung Sozialer Bewegungen。Sozialer Wandel。Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE