:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界公民意涵及其對我國成人教育之啟示
作者:陳鈺艷 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-Yen
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:社會教育學系
指導教授:楊國賜
陳雪雲
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:世界主義世界公民權利他者倫理世界公民能力世界公民教育cosmopolitanismcosmopolitan rightethics of the othercosmopolitan competencecosmopolitan education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:221
本研究探究世界公民意涵在歷史發展脈絡下的轉折,分析世界公民的重要內涵並說明世界公民內涵落實在成人教育的途徑與策略。首先透過文獻探討、藉由多重詮釋分析相關經典文本,歸納世界主義和世界公民重要概念,再進行分析比較。此外,收集公民身分和世界公民能力相關文獻,作為世界公民教育評析之依據。
研究結果將世界公民歸納為政治道德和倫理取向,並建立在能力之上。世界公民意涵對我國成人教育的啟示為:與政治道德取向的世界公民意涵相符應的是理性人文取向的成人教育,目標為透過學習社會與全人教育培育自我完善和理性公民。而政治實踐取向的批判成人教育目的則在解放人性。
研究者反思理性取向的成人教育,提出倫理取向的成人教育內涵:對他人負責的教育實踐內涵為非正式關係中生成世界性,感同身受包容他異性,及教育者的倫理責任是學習回應的能力和愛的智慧。
在反思台灣相關的成人教育政策與成人公民教育方面,對終身學習政策內涵進行檢討,主張在成人教育領域中納入世界公民教育,增加世界公民能力的倫理層面。
最後,本研究提出下列建議:將世界公民教育納入成人教育政策,以「學習共同生活」和「學習生存」作為主軸;成人教育作為溝通了解他者的平台;發展與世界公民的相關學習理論;成人教育增加責任倫理層面;反思中華文化的世界公民觀並開啟後續研究,可從儒家文化與宗教層面著手。
關鍵字:世界主義、世界公民權利、他者倫理、世界公民能力、世界公民教育。
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to analyze historical context of cosmopolitanism and cosmopolitan research, and its implications for adult education in Taiwan. At first, the study reviews the literature of classical cosmopolitanism. I collect the related issue of the citizenship, cosmopolitan citizenship and cosmopolitan competences
The research results are showed as following: cosmopolitan content can divide in political-moral approach and ethical approach, based on competences. The cosmopolitan content of political-moral approach corresponds to the humanistic approach of adult education. It aims to self-improvement and reasonable citizen through Learning society and holistic education. Critical adult education in political-practices approach aims to emancipate the humanity. I reflect on the traditional cosmopolitan thoughts and suggest that adult education should turn to the ethical approach, such as constructing the worldliness in relationships, being empathic and tolerant to the alterity. The responsibility of educators is to communicate the ability to respond and the wisdom of love.
According to the analysis of adult education policy, one finds that such education policy has limited effect in supporting adult to live in socially heterogeneous group. Therefore I suggest:
(1) As the aims of the social education, policy of adult education should enlarged from the nation-state frame to the worldliness.
(2) For cultivating the adult competence, the policy of adult education focuses on practice in the public sphere.
(3) Strengthen the worldliness and the unconditional responsibility.
(4) In the related planning programs, the objects are adults and the threshold level core competences.
(5) focuses on the political and ethical dimension, facing the humanity and the education of alterity
I think the community college and the Internet can be the interconnections board to cultivate cosmopolitan.Finally, I offer recommendations in the following respects, including: cosmopolitan education in the policy of adult education: learn to live together and learn to be as the goals; adult education as the board to communicate and understand the other; developing the cosmoplitan learning theories; concern the responsibility-ethical dimension in adult education; reflect on the Chinese cosmopolitan content and follow-up research.
Keywords:cosmopolitanism, cosmopolitan right, ethics of the other, cosmopolitan competence, cosmopolitan education.
中文部分

丁福寧(2012年10月)。“斯多噶學派的視為己有。論文發表於臺灣哲學學會2012年度學術研討會:「道、覺知與規範」,臺灣大學哲學系。new window
马香莲(2008)。赫钦斯的学习社会思想及其对成人教育的启示。成人教育,263(12),14-15。
中華民國成人及終身教育學會編(2003)。社會變遷與成人教育。台北:師大書苑。
中華民國成人及終身教育學會編(2005)。非正規學習。台北:師大書苑。
內政部統計處(2013)。102年第5週內政統計通報(101年底在我國之外籍人士統計)。2013年7月20日取自:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=7134
方永泉(2004)。Pierre Hadot「關於”自我的修養”概念的反省」(Reflections on the idea of the‘cultivation of the self’)一文之導讀。2012年11月22日,取自:http://www.tmue.edu.tw/~primary/culturereade/document/112701.doc
方永泉(2010)。赫欽思(R. M. Hutchins)論美國高教育的困境。通識在線,29,26-28。
王俊斌(2007)。個體自由、群體權利與全球公民─論人權理念的發展與教育實踐。師大學報,教育類,52(1),25-44。new window
王俊斌(2008)。後民主化狀況及其對公民教育問題-一種趨向性對比範式的建構。彰化師大教育學報,14,19-41。new window
王政彥(2004)。變遷社會中成人教育的變與不變。成人教育,77,12-22。
王柏松(2009)。中国传统文化中的和谐思想对构建和谐世界的启迪。管子学刊,2,87-91。
王雅玄(2007)。多元文化素養評量工具及其應用:現況與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,4,149-175。new window
王敬华(2009)。儒家和而不同思想与和谐世界。昆明理工大学学报(社会学版),9(4),13-17。
王楷(译)(2011)。情感主义德性伦理学:一种当代的进路。(原作者:Slote, M.. Sentimentalist Virtue Ethics: A Contemporary Approach)。美德伦理与儒家思想国际学术研讨会。2012年8月28日取自:http://www.qikan.com.cn/Article/ddym/ddym201102/ddym20110205.html
王锟(2008)。目的论与自由: 论康德的政治哲学。浙江師範大學學報,33,72-76。
伍美蓮(1995)。《內在價值.價值判斷與感情》。碩士論文。香港:香港中文大學。
朱茹华、卢梦霞(2005)。学习社会理念初探。黑龙江教育学院学报,24(2),13-15。
朱锋刚(2009)。“归家”:斯多葛派伦理学的指归。学习与探索,3,56-58。
江宜樺(1995)。政治是什麼?── 試析亞里斯多德的觀點。台灣社會研究季刊, 19,165-194 。new window
江宜樺(2000)。〈政治判斷如何可能?簡述漢娜鄂蘭晚年作品的關懷〉。當代,150,28-43。
江宜樺(2003)。公共領域中理性溝通的可能性。載於許紀霖(編),公共性與公共知識份子。江蘇人民出版社。 http://www.phil.ccu.edu.tw/chinese/lecture/doc/public.doc
江宜樺(2005)。公民理念與公民的教育。通識教育,12(1),27-44。
牟宗三(1968)。心體與性體。台北:正中。new window
牟宗三(1983)。《中國哲學十九講》。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
自由時報(2010)。首例逼印勞吃豬肉,雇主被起訴。2010年5月10日取自:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/may/10/today-t3.htm
自由時報電子報(2010)。首例逼印勞吃豬肉雇主被起訴。2010年4月20日取自:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/may/10/today-t3.htm
何雅雯(2001)。漢娜.阿倫特(Hannah Arendt)判斷理論及其教育蘊義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
余创豪(2006)。在全球化的脉络下探讨Nussbaum的世界主义和世界公民意识。開放時代,3,58-67。
吳秀瑾(2006)。關懷倫理的道德蘊涵:試論女性主義的道德知識生產與實踐。政大哲學學報,16,107-162。new window
吳明烈(1998)。跨世紀的學習社會宣言:一九九六聯合國教科文組織的學習報告書,師友雙月刊,367,37-40。
吳明烈(2001)。終身學習的國際發展脈絡與趨勢,成人教育,62(7),32-40。
吳明烈(2003)。反省式全球學習社會。社教雙月刊,114,25-33。
吳明烈(2004)。終身學習:理念與實際。台北市:五南。
吳明烈(2005)。UNESCO、OECD與歐盟推展終身學習之比較,終身教育,2,29-38。
吳芝儀、廖梅花(2001)。紮根理論研究方法。嘉義:濤石。(Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin, 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research:Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory.)
吳斯茜、計惠卿(2008)。開拓世界公民教育的新生地──以國小語文教學為例。教育資料與研究,83,227-240。new window
李义天(2009)。斯洛特的美德伦理学及其心理学预设。伦理学研究,41 (3),81-85。
李永毅(2006)。西方世界主義思想的復興。國外理論動態,12,39-43。
李明輝(2002)。康德歷史哲學論文集。台北:聯經。
李美萱(2006)。高中學生公民資質之研究-以台北縣市公立高中為例。台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
李润兰、石健壮(2012)。反思与超越:全球化时代的情感教育。教育探索杂志,250(4),17-20。
沈清松(1987)。物理之後形上學的發展。台北:牛頓。new window
周明泉(2006)。「後民族格局」轉向「共和性世界公民主義」的可能性條件之初探—九一一事件五周年祭。當代,112,44-73。
周桂田(2001)。風險、不確定性與第二現代。現代與後現代研討會,中研院歐美研究所。
周桂田(2005)知識、科學與不確定性—專家與科技系統的「無知」如何建構風險,政治與社會哲學評論,13(6), 131-180。new window
易杰雄(1999)。典藏思想家:康德。台北:書泉。
林火旺(2004)。公共理性的功能及其限制。政治與社會哲學評論,8,47-77new window
林火旺(2011)。倫理學。台北:五南。
林安悟(2004)。後新儒學的新思考:從「外王」到「內聖」-以「社會公義」論為核心的儒學可能。鵝湖,30(2),16-25。
林建福(2009)。同情、道德與道德教育的哲學探究。當代教育研究季刊,17 (4),1-2。new window
林振春(2004)。社區大學與台灣社區學習文化的深耕。2004兩岸社區大學經營理念與運作實務研討會論文集。台北市:中華民國社區教育學會。new window
林端(2004)。儒家倫理在全球化下的時代意義:社會學觀點的考察。載於魏澤民(編)覺醒的力量,173-209。台北:宗博。
林端(2009)。儒家倫理的「脈絡化的普遍主義」:以「仁」為例作說明。江南大學學報「人文社會科學版」,8(4),5-8。
罗维(2007)。公共理性与社会和谐。宁波大学学报,20(1),75-79。
邱連煌編(2008)。公民教育:培養全球性意識。台北,文景。
姜文斌(2011)。康德哲學與世界主義。台灣哲學學會年度研討會:真理、善與生活:哲學之饗宴。
洪仁進(2008)。包曼(Zygmunt Bauman) 哲學中的教師圖像。教師天地,155 (8),34-40。
洪如玉(2010)。後形上學的公民資質與公民教育的批判性探討:從Rorty 觀點出發。當代教育研究,18 (2 ),1-28。new window
洪雯柔(2011)。全球化下的教學與課程議題:聯合國推動之全納教育。教育研究月刊,206,35-48。new window
胡正光(2007)。從工具理性批判的角度看貝克的「第二現代」。歐美研究,37(3),445-448。new window
胡偉(2003)。民主與全球秩序:從現代國家到世界主義治理。上海:新華。 (David Held 1995. Democracy and the global order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance.)
胡夢鯨(1989)。全人教育理念下的大學通識教育改革芻論,淡江學報,27,133-155。
英國文化協會(2009)。「教室連結」推廣國際學校合作六縣市國中以網路平台培養世界公民。2011年7月16日取自:http://www.britishcouncil.org/tw-about-us-press-room-connecting-classrooms-update.pdf
唐君毅(1979)。中國文化之精神價值。台北:正中。
唐忠毛(2008)。佛教生態倫理核心及其現代詮釋。2010年4月20日取自:http://big5.fjnet,com/fjlw/200810/t20081027_85764.htm
夏業良、盧煒譯(2008)。體驗經濟時代。台北:經濟新潮社。(Pine, J.B. & Gilmore, H.J., 1999. The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.)
孫治本(1999)。全球化危機。台北:台灣商務。(Beck, Ulrich 1998. Was ist Globalisierung? Germany Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp Verlag.)
孫治本(2001)。個人主義與第二現代。載於顧忠華 (編) 第二現代:風險社會的出路,99-126。台北:巨流。new window
徐賁(2002)。阿倫特公民觀述評,二十一世紀雙月刊,69(2),117-126。new window
徐贲(2007)。世界公民和理性破碎的世界-雅斯贝尔斯的普世主义信念。天涯,4,172-181。
高宣揚(2004)。傅科的生存美學-西方思想的起點與終結。台北:五南。
高振農(2011)。康有為《大同書》中的淨土思想。2011年7月16日取自:http://www.hkbuddhist.org/magazine/542/542_05.html
崇明(2011)。卢梭思想中的世界主义和普遍意志。中国人民大学学报,4,60-68。
康健(2010)。赫钦斯在芝加哥大学的改革。东北师范大学碩士論文。
張玉珮(2003)。當代閱聽人理論之重構:試論閱聽人的思辨能力。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
張君玫(2006)。「世界」的翻譯與建構—中國西化論述中的幾種「世界主義」。東吳社會學報,20,59-108。new window
張秀雄(1995)。台灣地區成人公民教育的問題與改進策略。成人教育月刊,27,35-41。
張杰、李勇華(譯)(2002)。《列維納斯—法外的思想》(原作者:港道隆)。河北石家莊:河北教育出版社。
張鍠焜(2007)。E. Levinas「為他」倫理學及其德育蘊義。教育研究集刊,53 (3),67-92。
張鍠焜(2010)。「友善接納」倫理與教育:J. Derrida的觀點。教育研究集刊,56 (1),1-29。new window
張祥龍(2005)。佛家的緣起終極觀與龍樹的中觀。普門學報,28,1-11。
梁啟超(2004)。先秦政治思想史。天津:天津古籍。new window
梁福鎮(2009)。全球化脈絡下台灣公民教育的挑戰與回應。教育科學期刊,8(1),63-86。new window
莫大華(2004)。漢娜.鄂蘭(Hannah Arendt)政治思想的特色與省思。復興崗學報,82,317-338。new window
許國賢(2010)。多元主義與民主。行政暨政策學報,50 (6),1-31。new window
郭至和(2002)。建構主義典範在教育研究方法論中的運用與啟示。彰化師大教育學報,3,79-98。new window
郭忠華(2008)。當代公民身分的理論輪廓——一個新範式的探索。公共行政評論,6,52-73。
郭昭佑(2001)。教育評鑑指標建構方法探究。國教學報,13,252-278。
陳向明(2003)。質的研究方法與社會科學研究。北京:教育科學出版社。new window
陳向明(2004)。教師如何作質的研究。台北:洪葉。
陳振崑(2006)。從整體性的觀點與「一體兩用」的思惟理路,重建張橫渠的天人合一論,華梵人文學報。2010年 9月20日取自: http://newwww.hfu.edu.tw。new window
陳雪雲(2004)。邁向全球風險時代博物館教育新思維。博物館學季刊,18 (1),7-18。new window
陳雪雲(2008)。世界公民身分及其對新聞媒體活絡公民文化之啟示。教育資料與研究雙月刊,80,107-128。new window
陳雪雲、吳慎慎、陳仲彥、郭文耀(2013)。重返歷史、人權與記憶~台灣烏腳病醫療紀念館的新未來。博物館學季刊,27(2),31-53。new window
陳閔翔(2005)。社群主義的公民教育:論沈岱爾「形塑計畫」(formative project)的哲學意涵。中國政治學會年會暨多元「多元社會、和解政治與共識民主」學術研討會。
陳維剛(2002)。我與你。台北:桂冠。(Buber, M. 1923. I and Thou. NY: Scribner.)
陳麗華(2011)。公民行動取向全球議題課程設計與實踐案例。台灣民主季刊,8,47-82。new window
陳麗華、彭增龍(2007)。全球觀課程設計的新視野:公民行動取向。教育發展與研究期刊,3(2),1-15。new window
童涵浦(002)。Hannah Arendt的政治判斷理論與台灣的民主政治,文化研究月報,第20期。2012年12月28日取自:http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~eng/csa/journal/park_20.htm
舒奎翰﹙2006﹚。晚期傅科的主體與權力觀:一個嘗試性的分析。文化研究月報 三角公園。2011年10月09日取自:http://www.cc.ncu.edu.tw/~csa/journal/55/journal_park425.htm。
馮朝霖(2003)。教育哲學專論—主體、情性與創化。台北:高等教育。
黃振豊(2003)。麥金泰爾(Alasdair MacIntyre)人格教育理論。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。new window
黃國清(2007)。福利國家與儒家福利政治哲學之對話--國富民強之道新解。國立政治大學社會學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。new window
黃富順(2000)。成人教育導論,台北:五南圖書。
黃瑞祺(2002)。「自我修養與自我創新:晚年傅柯的主體/自我觀」。中國學術,12,105-129。new window
黃瑞祺(2005)。再見傅柯,台北:松慧。
楊明華(2003)。國小六年級社會教科書世界觀教育內涵之分析。臺北:臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。(尚未出版)new window
楊國德(2007)。國際終身學習的特色與發展趨勢,教育資料與研究雙月刊,77, 141-158。new window
楊國賜(1993)。社會教育的理念。台北:師大書苑。
楊國賜(2004)。加強社會公民教育,重建社會秩序。臺灣教育,627,2-13。
楊婉儀(2012)。以「在同一當中的大寫他者」論萊維納斯的責任與倫理意涵,東吳哲學學報, 26,109-136。new window
溫明麗(2006)。詮釋典範與教育研究。載於潘慧玲(編),教育研究方法論,154-186。台北:心理。
葉晉嘉(2012)。臺灣城鄉後物質價值觀的差異與變遷。調查研究-方法與應用,27,53-80。new window
葉啟政(2008)。邁向修養社會學,台北:三民。
董秀蘭(2006)。全球化下的社會領域課程與世界公民資質的建構。載於張秀雄、鄧毓浩(編),多元文化與民主公民教育,47-64。臺北:韋伯文化。
賈馥茗、楊深坑(1993)。教育學方法論。台北:五南。
鄒川雄(2005)。問題意識之建構及其在研究過程中的方法意義。載於林本炫、周平(編)。質性研究方法與議題創新,21-58,高雄:復文。
鄒川雄(2006)。生活世界與默會知識:詮釋學觀點的質性研究。載於齊力、林本炫(編),質性研究方法與資料分析。頁21-55。高雄:復文。
趙中建編(1999)。全球教育發展的研究熱點。北京:教育科學。
劉姝言(2006)。臺灣公民教育的民主性之內容分析:以高中公民課程為例。課程研究,2(1),83-113。new window
劉美慧、董秀蘭(2009)。我國公民教育革新之反思—國際公民教育與素養調查計畫之研究與啟示。教育資料與研究,87,145-162。new window
慧開(2001)。佛教教學對現代教育的啟悟之探索。普門學報,3,196-227。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
蔡英文(1997)。認同與政治-一種理論性之反省。政治科學論叢,8,51-84。new window
蔡英文(1998)。價值多元主義、相對主義與政治認同:柏林、雷茲與葛雷論點之分析。載於蕭高彥、蘇文流 (編) 多元主義,441-485。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
蔡英文(2000)。政治判斷如何可能?簡述漢娜‧鄂蘭晚年作品的關懷。當代, 150,28-43。
蔡英文(2002)。政治實踐與公共空間—漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想。台北:聯經。new window
蔡英文(2005)。公民身分的多重性及其民主政治的意涵。政治與社會哲學評論,14,1-35。new window
談谷錚(1991)。公民資格。台北:桂冠。
鄧元尉(2011)。列維納斯面容現象學中的上帝之思及其神學蘊義。哲學與文化,38 (3),95-118。new window
鄧伯宸(譯)(2006)。黑暗時代的群像。(原作者:Arendt, H.,1968. Men in Dark Times.)。台北:立緒
鄧紅風(2004)。少數群體的權利:民族主義、多元主義與公民權。台北:左岸。(Kymlicka, W., 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship.)
鄧弼文(2001)。台灣地區地方競爭力評估指標建構之研究。輔仁大學應用統計研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
鄭棨元、陳惠慈(2001)。全球化與文化。台北:韋伯。(2005 更名:最新文化全球化)
蕭瑞麟(2008)。不用數字的研究。台北:培生。
戴育賢(2000)。重返公共領域:哈伯瑪斯、女性主義、羅逖、文化研究。新聞學研究, 62,119-142。new window
戴璉璋(2003)。儒家慎獨說的解讀。中國文哲所研究集刊,23(9),211-234。new window
聯合國教科文組織(1948)。《世界人權宣言》(Universal Declaration of Human Rights)。2012年8月28日取自:http://www.un.org/zh/documents/udhr/
鍾宜興(2010)。心靈追索:學校教育政治學與教師的建構。台北:巨流。(Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: the politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.)。
顏素霞(2009)。公民資質研究:屏東師範學院大一學生公民知識與公民活動態度取向知相關研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,33,201-232。new window
魏嘉美(2006)。北高兩市國中社會學習領域教師世界公民教育觀點之研究。國立師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文。
顧忠華編(2001)。第二現代-風險社會的出路?台北:巨流。
孙庆斌(2007)。勒维纳斯的他者问题研究。黑龙江大学博士学位论文,未出版,哈尔滨。
张鲁宁(2009)。世界公民观念与世界公民教育。思想理论教育,20,25-28。
杨大春(2009)。列维纳斯或主体性的失落、延续与转换。江西社会科学,9,68-76。
谭安奎(2010)。古今之间的哲学与政治。天涯,6,91-104。
陈赟(2006)。“以人治人”与他者的接纳—《中庸》思想的一个维度。人文杂志,2,56-61。
韩水法,黄燎宇(2010)。从市民社会到公民社会:理解“市民—公民”概念的维度。北京:北京大学出版社。

外文部分


Appiah, K. A. (2002). Cosmopolitan Patriots. In M. Nussbaum & J. Cohen (Eds.), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, Boston: Beacon, 21-29.
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism:Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: Nortons.
Arendt, H. (1954). The Crisis in Education. Retrieved April 18 2012 from http://www.instituteofideas.com/documents/PGF_Arendt_Education.pdf
Arendt, H. (1968). Karl Jaspers: Citizen of the World. In H. Arendt, Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Arendt, H. (1982). Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: the University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle(1984). The Politics. Trans. By Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Audigier, F. (2000). Basic Concepts and Core Competencies for Education for Democratic Citizenship. Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-Operation.
Baker, G. (2009).Cosmopolitanism as Hospitality: Revisiting Identity and Difference in Cosmopolitanism, Alternatives 34(2), 107-128.
Banks, J (ed.) (2004) Diversity and Citizenship Education: Global perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Beck, U. & Grande E. (2010). Varieties of Second Modernity: the Cosmopolitan Turn in Social and Political Theory and Research. British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 409-443.
Beck, U. & Grande, E. (2007). Das kosmopolitische Europa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. & Lau, C. (2004). Entgrenzung und Entscheidung: Was ist neu an der Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. & Sznaider, N.(2006). Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences. British journal of sociology, 57(1), 1-23.
Beck, U. (1993). Die Erfindung des Politischen. Zu einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (1996). Das Zeitalter der Nebenfolgen und die Politisierung der Moderne. In Beck, Ulrich/Anthony Giddens/Scott Lash, et al. Reflexive modernisierung. Eine Kontroverse, S. 19-112. Frankfurt am Main: Surkamp.
Beck, U. (1998). Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2000). The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity, British Journal of Sociology, 51, 79-105.
Beck, U. (2002). Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2002a). The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies, Theory, Culture and Society, 19 (1), 17-44.
Beck, U. (2002b). The Silence of Words and Political Dynamics in the World Risk Societ', Logos, 1, 1–18.
Beck, U. (2004). The Truth of Others: a Cosmopolitan Approach. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 430-449.
Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2006a). Living in the World Risk Society, Economy and Society, 35(3), 329-345.
Beck, U. (2007): Weltrisikogesellschaft: Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2008). World at Risk: the New Task of Critical Theory, Development and Society, 37(1), 1-21.
Beck, U. (2009). Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision, Constellations, 16(1), 3-22.
Beck, U. (2010). Remapping Social Inequalities in an Age of Climate Change: for a Cosmopolitan Renewal of Sociology, Global Networks, 10 (2), 165–181.
Beck, U. (2013). Risk, Class, Crisis, Hazards and Cosmopolitan Solidarity/Risk Community –Conceptual and Methodological Clarifications. Workshop on « Risk and Climate Change: The Shaping of a Cosmopolitan Future », held in Paris on 10-11 December 2012.
Beck, U., Bonss, W. & Lau, C. (2003).The Theory of Reflexive Modernization Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme, Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1-33.
Beck, U., Giddens, & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Beitz, C.R. (1994). Cosmopolitan Liberalism and the States System. In Brown C.(ed.), Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Benhabib, S. (2004).The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berlin, I. (2002). Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biesta, G., Kwiek, M., Lock, G., Martins, H., Papatsiba, V., Simons, M., & Zgaga, P. (2009). What is the Public Role of the University? A Proposal for a Public Research Agenda. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 249-254.
Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Brookfield, S.D. (1986). Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Brown, E. (2006). The Stoics Invented Cosmopolitan Politics. Conference "Cosmopolitan Politics: On The History and Future of a Controversial Ideal". Frankfurt am Main, December 2006.
Burggraeve, R (1999). Violence and the Vulnerable Face of the Other: The Vision of Emmanuel Levinas on Moral Evil and Our Responsibility, Journal of Social Philosophy, 30 (1), 29-45.
Chalier, C. & Bouganim, A. (2008) Emmanuel Levinas: School master and pedagogue. In: D. Egéa-Kuehne (ed.) Levinas and Education: At the Intersection of Faith and Reason. New York: Routledge.
Cheah, P. (2006). Cosmopolitanism, Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 486-496.
Cogan, J.J., & Derricott, R. (1998). Citizenship for the 21st century: An international perspective on education. London: Kogan Page.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE. (2010). Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Council of Europe Charter on Education for Democratic Citizenship and Human Rights Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Creswell J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. London: Sage.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
Delanty, G., (2006). The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory. British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 25-47.
Delors, J. et al. (1996). Learning: the Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO.
Derrida, J. (1999). Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas, Trans. Pascale Anne Brault & Michael Naas. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J. (2000). Of Hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J. (2001). On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, Trans. by Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes, Routledge: London and New York.
Donald, J. (2007). ,Internationalisation, Diversity and the Humanities Curriculum: Cosmopolitanism and Multiculturalism Revisited’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(3), 289-308.
Edwards, R. (1997). Changing Places? Flexibility, lifelong learning and a learning society. London: Routledge.
European Commission (2007). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning-A European Reference Framework. Retrieved 19 September 2009 from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/keycomp_en.pdf
F. Forman-Barzilai (2010). Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A., Lopes, H., Petrovsky, A., Rahnema, M., & Ward, F. C. (Eds.) (1972). Learning to Be: The World of Education Today and Tomorrow. Paris: Unesco.
Featherstone, M., H. Patomäki & Venn, C. (Eds) ( 2002). Cosmopolis: Special Issue, Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 1-2.
Fine, R. (2003). Taking the 'Ism' Out of Cosmopolitanism: An Essay in Reconstruction, European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 451-470.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow P. (Eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics ( pp. 208–226). Brighton: Harvester.
Foucault, M. (1984) .What is Enlightenment? In Paul Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon, 32–50.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment ?(Qu'est-ce que les Lumières?). In P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the Heart. New York: Continuum.
Galston, W. (1989). Civic Education in the Liberal State. In N. L. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilabert, P. (2006). Cosmopolitanism and Discourse Ethics: A Critical Survey, New Political Science, 28(1), 1-21.
Giroux, H. A.(1992). Border Crossing: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge.
Golmohamad, M. (2009). Education for World Citizenship: Beyond National Allegiance, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(4), 466-486.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing Paradigms is Qualitative Research. California: Sage.
Gunesch, K. (2007). Education for Cosmopolitanism? Cosmopolitanism as a Personal Cultural Identity Model For and Within, International Education,Journal of Research, 3(3), 251–275.
Habermas, J. (1997). Modernity: An Unfinished Project. In D’Entreves, M. P. & Benhabib, S. (Eds.). Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge : Polity Press.
Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture, Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 237-251.
Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational Connections:Culture, People, Places. New York: Routledge.
Hannerz, U. (2005). Two Face of Cosmopolitanism: Culture and Politics, in Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 2005/3. Retrieved 19 September 2011 from http://www.sciecom.org/index.php/st/article/view/3534.
Hannerz, U. (2006). Two Faces of Cosmopolitanism: Culture and Politics. Barcelona: Fundació CIDOB.
Hansen D. T. (2010). Chasing Butterflies Without a Net: Interpreting Cosmopolitanism, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(2), 151-166.
Hansen, D. T. (2008). Curriculum and the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Inheritance, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 289-312
Hansen, D. T. (2009) "Dewey and Cosmopolitanism, Education and Culture, 25(2), 126-140.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society; Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
Harvey, D. (1999). Cosmopolitanism and the Banality of Geographical Evils, Public Culture 12(2), 529-564.
Heater, D. (1990). Citizenship: the Civic Ideal in World History, Politics, and Education. London: Longman.
Held, D. (2001). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Himmelfarb, G. (2002). The Illusions of Cosmopolitanism. In Nussbaum, M. & Cohen, J. (Eds), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism (pp. 72-77). Boston: Beacon.
Hoskins, B. & Deakin Crick, R. (2008). Social Justice, Research and European Policy: Defining and Measuring key Competences in Education, European Education Research Journal, 7 (3), 308-310.
Hoskins, B. (2006). A Framework for the Creation of Indicators on Active Citizenship: Citizenship and Education and Training for Active Citizenship. Ispra: Joint Research Centre.
Hull, G., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sahni, U. (2010). Cultural Citizenship and Cosmopolitan Practice: Global Youth Communicate Online, English Education, 42(4), 331–367.
Hunchins, R. M. (1968). The Learning Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
IEA (2007). International Civic and Citizenship Education Study: Assessment Framework. Amsterdam: IEA.
Isaac, J. C. (1996). A New Guarantee on Earth: Hannah Arendt on Human Dignity and the Politics of Human Rights, American Political Science Review, 90(1), 61-73.
Jackson, J. (2011). Cultivating Cosmopolitan, Intercultural Citizenship through Critical Reflection and International, Experiential Learning, Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(2), 80-96.
Janoski, T. (1998). Citizenship and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning. London: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (2011). Rediscovering Adult Education in a World of Lifelong Learning. In: Merriam, S. B. & Grace A. P. (Eds), The Jossey-Bass Reader on Contemporary Issues in Adult Education (pp.113-119). San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
Jollimore, T. & Barrios, S. (2006). Creating Cosmopolitans: the Case for Literature, Studis in Philosophy and Education, 25(5), 363-383.
Kant, I. (1970). Politic Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2007). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Kommentar von Christoph Horn, Corinna Mieth und Nico Sarano. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kant, I.(1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Berlinische Monatsschrift. Dezember-Heft S. 481-494. Retrieved 25 April 2011 from http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/philosophie/texte/kant/aufklaer.htm
Keating, A. (2009). Educating Europe’s Citizens: Moving from National to Post-National Models of Educating for European Citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 135-151.
Kennedy, K. J. (2006). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Active and Passive Citizenship, unpublished paper.
Kivisto, P. & Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship: Theory, Discourse and Transnational Prospects. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kleingeld, P. & Brown, E. (2006). Cosmopolitanism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 25 August 2009 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/
Kleingeld, P. (1998). Kant's Cosmopolitan Law: World Citizenship for a Global Order, Kantian Review, 2, 72–90.
Koehn, P. & Rosenau J. (2002). Transnational Competence in an Emerging Epoch, International Studies Perspectives, 3, 105-127.
Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: Sage.
Kymlicka, W.(2002)Multiculturalism and Minority Rights: West and East, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 4, 1-25.
Lenzen, D. (Hrsg.). (1994). Erzihungswissenschaft. Ein Grundkurs. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Trans. A. Lingis & Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Levinas, E. (1987). Time and the Other, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1989). Martin Buber and the Theory of Knowledge. In S. Hand (Ed.). The Levinas Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 59-74.
Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than Being: or Beyond Essence. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (2001). Existence and Existents. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
Martell, L. (2009). Global Inequality, Human Rights and Power: A Critique of Ulrich Beck's Cosmopolitanism. Critical Sociology, 35(2), 253-272.
Mau, S., Mewes J. & Zimmermann A. (2008). Cosmopolitan Attitudes through Transnational Social Practice? Global Network, 8(1), 1-24.
Mitchell, K. (2007). Geographies of Identity: The Intimate Cosmopolitan, Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 706-720.
Morgan, D. (1988) . Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.
Morris, P. & Cogan, J. J., & Liu, M. (2002). A Comparative Overview: Civic Education across the Six Societies. In Civic Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 167-189 ). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Newman, M. (2000) Learning, Education and Social Action. In G. Foley (ed.) Understanding Adult Education and Training. Australia: Allen and Unwin, 267-281.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating Humanity:A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. Boston Review : A Political And Literary Forum. Retrieved 18 August 2010 from http://www. boston review.net/BR19.5/Nussbaum.html
Ortega-Ruiz, P. (2004). Moral Education as Pedagogy of Alterity, Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 271-289.
Oxfam (2006). Education for Global Citizenship: A Guide for Schools. Oxford: Oxfam.
Papastephanou, M. (2002). Arrows Not Yet Fired: Cultivating Cosmopolitanism Through Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (1), 69–86.
Papastephanou, M. (2011). The “Cosmopolitan”Self Does Her Homework, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(4), 597-610.
Pichler, F. (2009).‘Down-to-Earth’ Cosmopolitanism Subjective and Objective Measurements of Cosmopolitanism in Survey Research., Current Sociology, 57(5), 704-732.
Pogge, T. (2007). ”Cosmopolitanism”. In R. Goodlin, P. Pettit, T. Pogge(Eds.), A Companion to Political Philosophy (pp. 312-331). Oxford: Blackwell,
Pogge, T. W. (1992).Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty, Ethics, 103(1), 48-49.
Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the Age of School Reform: Science, Education, and Making Society by Making the Child. New York: Routledge.
Popkewitz, T. (2008). The Reason of Reason: Cosmopolitanism, Social Exclusion and Lifelong Learning. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds), Foucault and Lifelong Learning: Governing the Subject (pp. 74-86). London: Routledge,
Pries, L. (2008). Die Transnationalisierung der sozialen Welt. Sozialräume jenseits von Nationalgesellschaftn. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rantanen, T. (2005). Cosmopolitanization–now! An Interview with Ulrich Beck, Global Media and Communication, 1(3), 247-263.
Rapoport, A. (2009). Lonely Bussiness or Mutual Concern: The Roll of Comparative Education in the Cosmopolitan Citizenship Debates., Current Issues in Comparative Education, 12(1), 23-32.
Rapport, N. (2007). A Cosmopolitan Turn --or Return?, Social Anthropolog, 15(2), 223-35.
Rivzi, F. (2008). Epistemic Virtues and Cosmopolitan Learning, Australian educational researcher, 35(1), 17-35.
Rivzi, F. (2009). Towaed Cosmopolitan Learning, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 253-268.
Rizvi, F. (2008). Education and its Cosmopolitan Possibilities. In B. Lingard, J. Nixon & S . Ranson (Eds), Transforming Learning in Schools and Communities: the Remaking of Education for a Cosmopolitan Society. London & New York; Continuum.
Rizvi, F. (2009). Towards Cosmopolitan Learning, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 253-268.
Robertson, R. & Krossa, A. S. (2012). European Cosmopolitanism: A Critical Introduction European. In R. Robertson, & A. S. Krossa (Eds), European Cosmopolitanism in Question. UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scheitza, A. (1996). Interkulturelle Kompetenz: Förderung und Möglichkeiten der Evaluation. Saarbrücken: Dilpomarbeit am Psychologischen Institut der Universität des Saarlandes.
Scheler, M. (1976). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos, Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, in Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 9, Späte Schriften, Bern, S. 7-71.
Schueth, S. & O’Loughlin, J. (2008). Belonging to the World: Cosmopolitanism in Geographic Contexts, Geoforum, 39, 926-941.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, Attitudes and Engagement among Lower Secondary School Students in Thirty-Eight Countries. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA): Amsterdam.
Seligman, B.A. (1992). The Idea of Civil Society. New York: The Free Press.
Slote, M. (2007).The Ethics of Care and Empathy. New York:Routledge.
Smith, D. (2002). Zygmunt Baumann: Prophet of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Spretnak, C. (1999). The Resurgence of the Real: Body, Nature, and Place in the Hypermodern World. N.Y.: Routledge.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2004). Plato. Retrieved 25 June 2009 from http://plato.stanford.edu
Sutherland, L. (2010). The Divergent Cosmopolitanisms of Hannah Arendt, Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec: ConcordiaUniversity.
Sznaider, N. (2007). Hannah Arendt’s Jewish Cosmopolitanism: Between the Universal and the Particular. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1), 113–123.
Tandon, R. (2008). Participation, Citizenship and Democracy: Reflections on 25 year’s of PRIA, Community Development Journal, 43(3), 284-296.
Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the Other: Levinas, Psychoanalysis and Ethical Responsibilities in Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Todd, S. (2008). Toward an Imperfect Education: Facing Humanity, Rethinking Cosmopolitanism. Boulder: Paradigm.
Trezise, B.( 2009). Ambivalent Bereavements: Embodying Loss in the Twenty-First Century, Performance Paradigm, 5(2), 1-28.
Turner, B. S. (2001). Cosmopolitan Virtue: on Religion in a Global Age, European Journal of Social Theory, 4 (2), 131-152.
Turner, B. S. (2006). Classical Sociology and Cosmopolitanism: a Critical Defence of the Social, The British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 133-151.
UN General Assembly (1948). Charter of the United Nations. Retrieved January 18 2011 from http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter9.shtml
UNESCO (2001). Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2002). Learning our Way to Sustainability. Retrieved 25 August 2009 from http://www.unesco.org/en/esd
UNESCO (2003). Nurturing the Treasure: Vision and Strategy 2002 –2007. Retrieved 22 January 2013 from www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/MTS.pdf
Van Hooft, S. & Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). Introduction. In Van Hooft, S. & Vandekerckhove, W. (Eds), Questioning Cosmopolitanism. Dordrecht: Springer, xv- xxviii.
Vertovec, S. & Cohen, R. (2002). Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice. New York:Oxford University Press.
Vertovec, S. (2009). Cosmopolitan in Attitude, Practice and Competence. MMG working paper 09-08. Retrieved 25 April 2011 from http://mmg.mpg.sw/workingpapers
Waldron, J. (2000). What is Cosmopolitan? Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 227-244.
Weenink, D. (2008). Cosmopolitanism as a Form of Capital: Parents Preparing their Childern for a Globalizing World, Sociology, 42 (6), 1089-1106.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Research and Methods in Educatin: An introduction. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Wildemeersch, D., Finger, M. & Jansen, T. (Eds.) (2000). Adult Education and Social Responsibility: Reconciling the Irreconcilable? Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Wildemeersch, D., Stoobants, V. & Bron, M. Jr. (Eds.) (2005). Active Citizenship and Multiple Identities in Europe: A Learning Outlook. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE