:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:男性氣概對監獄文化之形塑:一所臺灣監獄的考察分析
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:許華孚 引用關係鄭瑞隆 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Hua-fuCheng, Jui-lung
出版日期:2007
卷期:67
頁次:頁153-192
主題關鍵詞:男性氣概男性監獄監獄次文化監獄管理性行為MasculinityMale prisonPrison culturePrison managementSexuality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:156
性別研究上的男性氣概,指的是典型的男性特質與人格表現,當在瞭解男性監獄中的生活經驗時,提供了一個非常有用的分析架構,因為在監獄組織中的社會秩序,不僅是透過組織中的法令規章,同時也透過「男性性別論述」來維持,這個男性性別論述不僅擁有文化與意識型態的價值,更是社會文化建構出來的性別圖像。 在全控的監獄機構裡,男性治理男性的監獄中,管理人員對受刑人的管教上及受刑人間的日常生活互動上,可以明顯觀察出男性主義中的男性氣概 (Masculinity)現象普遍存在。這種論述自然地以要求男性中心主義的機制為主流,所呈現的現象則是要成為一個男子漢、不能軟弱、不許有同情心、不能輕易表達感情,甚至監獄內的暴力和受刑人間的極端化地位階級(上層以強盜犯為主,下層以強姦犯為主),以及監獄內的同性性行為,皆可歸因於這種結構化男性主義的宰制。而這些現象的發生應非偶發事件,而是一種男性氣概型塑下的監獄文化。 本研究旨在以社會學的角度分析男性監禁的經驗,透過質性分析的方法去探究男性監禁的經驗是如何被建構,以及在監獄管理運作當中一直為人所忽略的準性別議題。本研究發現,男性監獄是一個被霸權的男性氣概(hegemonic masculinity)所宰制的社會,男性受刑人與管理人員在他們日常生活中的互動方式與行為態度上,持續地呈現出男性氣概論述所投射出來的性別認同與角色期待。男性氣概是解構監獄管理方式及監獄文化的一個強而有力的文化論述,對於反思監獄管理現況及提升人道矯正制度,具有不容忽視的影響作用。
A remarkable feature of the sociology of imprisonment and criminology that needs to be addressed is gender issue. The impact of gender on men has always been neglected. The experience of men in prison has traditionally been tied to the understanding of the hierarchical arrangements of the organization. A significant new dimension to sociological theory is to examine the dialectical relationship between gender and power in social institutions. Gender theories regard gender identity as the sense of self associated with socially structured definitions. A prison culture of masculinity shapes the prison macho─boys don’t cry. The prison macho is a real man who always hides his feelings and performs like a tough guy. These characteristics are much different from what happens in everyday life in general social spheres, where human beings need to be loved, need concerns and compassion from love ones and others and express these to others as well. In this study, there is a recognition of a multiplicity of masculinities and an emphasis on how subjects were continually constituting and constructing their identity. Based upon qualitative research, this paper analyzes the patterns of masculinity embedded in the daily code of conducts used by prison staff to deal with prisoners and by prisoners to interact with other inmates and to constitute their subculture. The investigation of prison sociology in the constitution of masculinity discourses in a prison at southern Taiwan contributes to both gender studies and to the literature exploring differences between western and eastern perspectives and policies related to incarceration.
期刊論文
1.畢恆達(20000800)。走入歧途的男性氣概養成過程。兩性平等教育季刊,12,44-46。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barritt, L.、Beekman, T.、Bleeker, H.、Mulderij, K.(1984)。Analyzing Phenomenological Descriptions。Journal of Phenomenology and Pedagogy,2(1),1-17。  new window
3.McDermott, Kathleen、King, Roy(1988)。Mind Games: Where the Action is in Prisons。British Journal of Criminology,28,357-377。  new window
4.畢恆達(20030300)。男性性別意識之形成。應用心理研究,17,51-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許華孚(20050900)。監獄與社會排除:一個批判性的分析。犯罪與刑事司法研究,5,191-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.朱蘭慧(20030300)。男性性別角色刻板印象之形成與鬆動。應用心理研究,17,85-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃淑玲(20030600)。男子性與喝花酒文化:以Bourdieu的性別支配理論為分析架構。臺灣社會學,5,73-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Cox, Verne C.、Paulus, Paul B.、McCain, Garvin(1984)。Prison Crowding Research: The Relevance for Prison Housing Standards and a General Approach Regarding Crowding Phenomena。American Psychologist,39(10),1148-1160。  new window
9.許華孚(2004)。英美刑罰發展與臺灣經驗之探究。犯罪與刑事司法研究,2,1-42。  延伸查詢new window
10.Segal, Lynne(1999)。禽獸之復:解讀男「性」暴力。性 / 別研究,5/ 6,62-103。  延伸查詢new window
11.Carrabine, Eammon、Longhurst, Brian(1998)。Gender and Prison Organisation: Some Comments on Masculinities and Prison Management。The Howard Journal,27(2),161-176。  new window
12.Newton, Carolyn(1994)。Gender Theory and, Prison Sociology: Using Theories of Masculinities to Interpret the Sociology of Prisons for Men。The Howard Journal,33(3),193-202。  new window
13.Hepburn, John(1985)。The Exercise of Power in Corrective Organizations: A Study of Prison Guards。Criminology,23,145-164。  new window
14.Dumond, Robert(1992)。The Sexual Assault of Male Inmates in Incarcerated Settings。International Journal of the Sociology of Law,20,135-157。  new window
會議論文
1.黃淑玲(1999)。從酒色應酬文化看臺灣社會的男性特質。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊士隆(2001)。臺灣地區監獄暴行之研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王家豪(2003)。娘娘腔男同性戀者的社會處境及其自我認同(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許茂雄(2003)。監獄受刑人遭受性侵害被害之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.斐學儒(2001)。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫:臺灣男同性戀者兵役經驗分析,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Irwin, J.(1970)。The felon。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
2.Archer, John、Lloyd, Barbara(2002)。Sex and Gender。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Segal, Lynne、Segal, L.(1990)。Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men。New Jersey:Rutgers University Press。  new window
4.黃徵男(2001)。監獄共和國。臺北縣中和市:多識界圖書文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Connell, R. W.(2002)。Gender。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
6.Clemmer, D.(1958)。The prison community。Boston:Christopher。  new window
7.Christie, N.(2000)。Crime Control as Industry。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Scraton, Phil、Sim, Joe、Skidmore, Paula(1991)。Prisons under Protest。Milton Keynes, UK:Buckingham:Open University Press:Open University Press。  new window
9.Clatterbaugh, Kenneth C.、林宗德、劉建台(2003)。男性氣概的當代觀點。台北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.DiIulio, John J.(1987)。Governing Prisons: A Comparative Study of Correctional Management。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
11.楊士隆、林健陽(2001)。犯罪矯治:問題與對策。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Sykes, Gresham M.(1958)。The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison。Princeton University Press。  new window
13.Schutz, Alfred(1972)。The phenomenology of the social world。Chicago, IL:Northwestern University Press。  new window
14.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
15.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(2001)。Masculine Domination。Polity Press。  new window
16.張喬婷(2000)。馴服與抵抗:十位校園女菁英拉子的情慾壓抑。臺北:唐山。  延伸查詢new window
17.Connell, Robert William(1987)。Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics。Oxford:Cambridge:Stanford:Sydney:Polity Press:Stanford University Press:Allen and Unwin。  new window
18.Merquior, J. G.、陳瑞麟(1998)。傅柯。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
19.Williams, Raymond(1976)。Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
20.Patton, Michael Q.(2002)。Qualitative evaluation and research methods。Sage Publications。  new window
21.Connell, Raewyn W.(1995)。Masculinities。Polity Press:Allen & Unwin:University of California Press。  new window
22.Savage, Mike、Witz, A.、Witz, Ann(1992)。The Gender of Organizations。Gender and Bureaucracy。Oxford。  new window
23.Mathiesen, Thomas(1965)。The Defences of the Weak: A Sociological Study of Aspects of a Norwegian Correctional Institution。The Defences of the Weak: A Sociological Study of Aspects of a Norwegian Correctional Institution。London, UK。  new window
24.Bendix, Reinhard(1966)。Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait。London:Methuen。  new window
25.Scacco, Anthony M., Jr.(1975)。Rape in Prison。Rape in Prison。Springfield, IL。  new window
26.Clear, Todd、Cole, George(1986)。American Corrections。American Corrections。Monterey, CA。  new window
27.Stanko, Elizabeth Anne(1990)。Everyday Violence: How Women and Men Experience Sexual and Physical Danger。Everyday Violence: How Women and Men Experience Sexual and Physical Danger。London, UK。  new window
28.Parker, Tony(1990)。Life after Life。Life after Life。London, UK。  new window
29.Jary, David、Jary, Julia(1991)。Collins Dictionary of Sociology。Collins Dictionary of Sociology。Glasgow, UK。  new window
30.Morgan, David(1992)。Discovering Man。Discovering Man。London, UK。  new window
31.Carlen, Pat(1993)。Women's Imprisonment。Women's Imprisonment。London, UK。  new window
32.Mathiesen, Thomas(2000)。Prison on Trial。Prison on Trial。Winchester。  new window
33.Hall, Stuart(1977)。Culture, Media, and the Ideological Effect。Mass communication and Society。London, UK。  new window
34.Cloward, Richard(1960)。Social Control in Prison。Theoretical Studies in the Social Organization of the Prison。New York, NY。  new window
35.Sykes, Gresham、Messinger, Sheldon(1960)。The Inmate Social System。Theoretical Studies in the Social Organization of the Prison。New York, NY。  new window
36.Goffman, Erving(1961)。On the Characteristics of Total Institutions。The Prison: Studies in Institutional Organization and Change。New York, NY。  new window
37.Foucault, Michel(1982)。Subject and Power。Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics。Chicago, IL。  new window
38.Plummer, Ken(1984)。The Social Uses of Sexuality: Symbolic Interaction, Power and Rape。Perspectives on Rape and Sexual Assault。London, UK。  new window
39.Porter, Roy(1986)。Rape-does it Have a Historical Meaning?。The Dialectics of Friendship。Oxford, UK。  new window
40.Remy, Martin(1990)。Patriarchy and Fratriarchy as Forms of Androcracy。Men, Masculinities and Social Theory。London, UK。  new window
41.Wright, Gwendowlyn、Rabinow, Paul(1994)。權力空間化:米歇.傅寇作品的討論。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
42.de Haan, Willem(1994)。Abolitionism and Crime Control。Criminological Perspectives。London, UK。  new window
43.Sim, Joe(1994)。Tougher Than the Rest? Men in Prison。Just Boys Doing Business?。0。  new window
44.Kokopeli, Bruce、Lakey, George(1995)。More Power Than We Want: Masculine Sexuality and Violence。Race, Class, and Gender: An Anthology。New York, NY。  new window
45.林茂榮、楊士隆(2002)。犯罪矯正機構生活之社會透視。監獄學-犯罪矯正原理與實務。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.顧忠華(2003)。社會學的理論與方法。社會學與臺灣社會。臺北市:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.高淑清(2000)。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
3.Foucault, M.(1980)。Truth and power。Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
4.Foucault, Michel(1991)。Governmentality。The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.甯應斌(200104)。同性戀/性工作的生命共同體:理論的與現實的連帶。性工作:妓權觀點。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE