:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:郭象的「性」主體論及其政治、社會實踐意義
書刊名:中正大學中文學術年刊
作者:馬行誼 引用關係
作者(外文):Ma, Hsing-yi
出版日期:2007
卷期:10
頁次:頁263-296
主題關鍵詞:魏晉玄學內聖外王本體論主體論Wei Jin Xuan XueNei Sheng Wai WangHuman natureOntologySubjectivismWei Jin metaphysics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:186
  • 點閱點閱:178
本文透過郭象「性」觀念的內涵與建構,指出其彰顯「性」的特質分別是:「個體的內在本質」、「天之性」,以及「以自然論性」等三個方面。在討論郭象「性」與其他觀念的聯繫上,我們發現其所謂的「性」觀念,在聯繫諸如「有待或無待」、「爲或不爲」、「知之用」等命題上,皆展現其核心的價值,並特別強調其於政治、社會場域上的能動作用。再者,本文從檢討湯用彤先生的「本體之學」開始,指出了郭象乃從檢討現實的政治、社會亂局中,要求回溯個體存在根源意義的「性」,藉以作爲改造名教世界客體存在的思維方式。因此,在「性」的主體之下,客體的存在都必須回歸「性」主體的核心價值之下,也就是郭象所謂的「得性」、「安性」、「適性」之說。郭象的「性」主體,分別在「理想人格的塑造」、「群我關係的建立」、「齊物逍遙的人生」與「無爲而治的理想」等四個政治、社會場域上,發揮其能動性,從而達到「內聖外王」的理想政治境界與社會藍圖。
The study stated the three characteristics of Guo Xiang's "human nature" through his content and construct, which were inner essence of individual, innate human nature, and discussing "human nature" through "Zi Ran." Exploring the connections of Guo Xiang's "human nature" and other concepts, the researcher found the concept of "human nature" showing its core value in the topics such as "You dai huo wu dai," "wei huo bu wei," "zhi zhi yong" and so on. Moreover, the activation of the "human nature" was accentuated in the society and one's life. In addition, the study reviewed the "ben ti zhi xue" by Yong-Tong Tang and pointed out that Guo Xiang asked to recall "human nature" of individual's existence in order to transform Ming-Jiao's thinking way of objectivism through reviewing a great confusion of politics and society. Therefore, in the subjectivism of "human nature," the existence of objectives must back to the core value of "human nature," in terms of "de xing," "an xing, " and "shi xing" by Guo Xiang. The subject of Guo Xiang's "human nature" brought the activation into four political and social aspects, such as "molding ideal personality," "building relationship between group and one's self," "life of qi wu xiao yao," and "an ideal of wu wei er zhi, " in order to reach an ideal realm as "nei sheng wai wang."
期刊論文
1.陳榮灼(19920600)。王弼與郭象玄學思想之異同。東海學報,33,123-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉榮賢(20030200)。魏晉時代中國本體論思想的進展。中華學苑,56,201-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.戴璉璋(19950900)。郭象的自生說與玄冥論。中國文哲研究集刊,7,39-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王曉毅(2001)。郭象「性」本體論初探。哲學研究,2001(9),32-38。  延伸查詢new window
5.許抗生(2000)。關於玄學哲學基本特徵的再探討。中國哲學史,2000(1),58-63。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳廉忠(1990)。淮南子譯注。淮南子譯注。長春。  延伸查詢new window
2.王叔岷(1993)。郭象莊子注校記。郭象莊子注校記。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Aristotle(2003)。形而上學。形而上學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.莊子、郭象、郭慶藩、王孝魚(198304)。莊子集釋。臺北:木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.錢穆(1991)。莊老通辨。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.嚴可均(199910)。全晉文。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.張立文(199707)。性。臺北:七略出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.荀況、楊倞、王先謙(1988)。荀子集解。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.莊耀郎(1999)。郭象玄學。臺北:里仁。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.魯迅、容肇祖、湯用彤、賀昌群(199508)。魏晉思想--乙編三種。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.(199007)。大美百科全書。臺北:光復書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.湯用彤(1984)。魏晉思想甲編五種。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.班固、陳立、吳則虞(1987)。白虎通疏證。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.余敦康(1998)。中國哲學論集。瀋陽:遼寧大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.康中乾(2003)。有無之辨--魏晉玄學本體思想再解讀。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.王曉毅(2003)。儒釋道與魏晉玄學形成。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.歐陽康(1998)。哲學研究方法論。武漢:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.王曉毅(1996)。王弼評傳。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.湯一介(1999)。郭象。東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.王葆玹(1996)。玄學通論。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.牟宗三(1985)。才性與玄理。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.王弼、樓宇烈(1992)。王弼集校釋。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.蘇新鋈(1980)。郭象莊學平議。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.湯一介(1987)。郭象與魏晉玄學。谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.傅佩榮(1985)。儒道天論發微。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.許抗生、李中華、陳戰國、那薇(1989)。魏晉玄學史。陝西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳奇猷(1980)。韓非子集釋。韓非子集釋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.任繼愈(1988)。中國哲學發展史(3)。中國哲學發展史(3)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE