:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:真實與虛構之混成:以印尼華裔婦女受暴事件為例
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:吳筱玫 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Hsiao-mei
出版日期:2008
卷期:95
頁次:頁111-143
主題關鍵詞:歷史書寫文本性真實虛構原真性寫眾Historical writingTextualityFactFictionAuthenticityWriting public
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:88
  • 點閱點閱:103
本文以十年前印尼華裔婦女受暴事件中之照片事件為例,透過三種不同時期的文本相互比較,試圖揭露網路的文本特質與其對歷史書寫之影響。研究發現,原始文本以超連結之照片為重要證詞,這些超連結已然失效,使原始文本不再具有原真性,而主流媒體《聯合報》之專家文本與搜尋引擎Google之群眾文本,其所呈現的真實面貌有著極大的不同,前者四平八穩,後者則極盡悲情之能事。Google之文本分析發現,群眾之歷史書寫與專家截然不同,造假的恐怖照片成為書寫的重要依據。當原真性消逝,我們難以辨別真偽,歷史便成了真實與虛構之混成,在一群寫眾引領之下,以文本間之比較互動為新的權力機制,一種精神分析式的歷史書寫策略,也隱然浮現。
This study attempted to explore the impacts of web textuality on the writing of history. Using the 1998 rape photo incident of Indonesia Chinese women as an example, three kinds of texts, the original, the mainstream newspaper, and those from the general public were compared. The analyses of the results indicated that since those brutal pictures being hyperlinked to the online forum of the United Morning Psot of Singapore were all removed from the linking websites, the original text from the forum at the same time lost its authenticity. The historical testimonies provided by the United Daily News of Taiwan and the Google search engine were very different by nature. The former one was relatively remote and objective, but the latter one acknowledged that those brutal pictures could play a crucial role in online historical construction of reality. Due to the writing of history involved a blending of fact and fiction, the authenticity of the story itself declined as well. Employing comparison and interaction among online texts has become the new mechanism for testimonial power, and using a psychoanalysis strategy instead of a historiographic one has also become the trend of writing history.
期刊論文
1.林麗雲(20000400)。為臺灣傳播研究另闢蹊徑?: 傳播史研究與研究途徑。新聞學研究,63,35-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Jameson, Fredric R.(1984)。Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism。New Left Review,146,53-93。  new window
3.彭琳淞(1998)。印尼受暴照片,張冠李戴。目擊者,7,20-21。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lyotard, J. F.(1988)。The Defferend: Phrases in Dispute。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
2.Giger, P.(2006)。Participation literacy: Part I: Constructing the Web 2.0 concept。Sweden:Blekinge Institute of Technology。  new window
3.de Certeau, Michel.(1988)。The Writing of History。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
4.Ong, Walter Jackson(1982)。Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word。Methuen。  new window
5.Popper, K.(1957)。The Poverty of Historicism。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
6.White, Hayden(1975)。Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth Century Europe。Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
7.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian(1986)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
8.Aarseth, Espen J.(1997)。Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature。Baltimore, Maryland:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.王晴佳、古偉瀛(2000)。後現代與歷史學:中西比較。巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Foucault, Michel、Rabinow, Paul(1984)。The Foucault Reader。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
11.Goody, Jack、Goody, J.(1986)。The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society。The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society。Cambridge。  new window
12.Knapp, J. A.(1997)。Essayistic messages: Internet newsgroups as an electronic public sphere。Internet culture。New York, NY。  new window
13.Nietzsche, F.(1970)。悲劇的誕生。悲劇的誕生。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.Nietzsche, F.(1969)。歷史之用途與濫用。歷史之用途與濫用。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.Eisenstein, E. L.(1983)。The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe。The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe。Cambridge, UK。  new window
16.O'Donnell, J. J.(1998)。Avatars of the Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace。Avatars of the Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace。Cambridge, MA/ London, UK。  new window
17.Burke, J.(1991)。Communication in the Middle Ages。Communication in History: Technology, Culture, Society。New York, NY。  new window
18.Barthes, R.(1997)。The Discourse of History。The Postmodern History Reader。London, UK/ New York, NY。  new window
19.Benjamin, W.(1985)。Illuminations。Illuminations。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE