The nuclear dogma ”no causation means not any liability at all” stemmed from the philosophy ”Corrective Justice” in civil law make it essential in every liability actions to establish the exact causation connection, nevertheless the always problematic elements of tort law, between alleged wrongdoing and the injury complained of. Admittedly the causation inquiry is definitely the most difficult and challenging task encountered, especially in the shift from common to special forms of tort liability, such as multiple tortfeasors and liability for damages caused by others (employees, minors, and independent contractors), animals, vehicles, goods, or dangerous business or activities etc., as herein proposed in our Civil Code §§185~191-3(what we called ”special torts”), which have gained and will keep harboring overwhelming importance in the rising litigations of the contemporary or near future juridical context due to the facing us changing trends of tort patterns. This article first elucidates briefly the fundamental regulations of logics and liability in civil laws, holding that the different causational logic structure implies the distinct liability respectively, and therewith attempts to illustrate in depth the way they are manipulated systemically in our Civil Code §§185~191-3, with special emphasis on the crucial application of ”sufficient condition” and ”necessary condition” coordinately in building up the logically concretely structured ”conjunctive condition” and ”disjunctive condition”, which will definitely help to grasp the unabridged integrated causation process complicated characteristically by multiple conditions herein. Furthermore, an impeccable detailed causation inference makes understood the distinct way the shift from individual to group and special patterns of responsibility and consequently makes it feasible for us to apply the laws more accurately and settle the disputes confidently. Hopefully this attempt will help and the fairness and justice of jurisdiction can finally be realized in ”special torts” litigations.