:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國政府人權指標建構模式之探討--從Freedom House人權指標評比分析
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:李酉潭 引用關係翁栢萱
作者(外文):Lee, Yeau-tarnWeng, Bor-shiuan
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁75-133
主題關鍵詞:人權人權指標自由之家世界人權宣言Human rightsHuman rights indicatorsFreedom houseUniversal Declaration of Human Rights
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:89
當人權保障正以全球化(globalization)的方式在國際間積極進行之際,台灣雖已進入自由民主國家之列,惟因歷次修憲偏重於政府體制的增修,除了基本國策部分條款外,對於憲法人權條款並未多所著墨;相較於國際社會中許多國家不斷調整其人民權利保障的清單,顯得我國人權保障之不足。尤其政府行政部門與人民權益關係最爲密切,因此,若能訂定出具體人權指標並定期做出執行評估,確能有效衡量人權政策內容是否具體落實,積極建構一套符合大家期待的人權保障體系實乃必要。本文以國際上具公信力之非政府人權組織「自由之家」(Freedom House)人權指標內容與評比方式做爲分析基礎,再探討我國政府部門如何逐步建立人權指標內涵與執行評估模式,期望透過國際化與本土化的聯結方式,提出一套適用於我國政府的人權指標體系,及具體可操作的執行評估模式,做爲我國在發展人權保障體系的重要參考。
The human rights protection is actively practiced in the international society as a result of globalization. In the meantime, Taiwan has been ranked as one of the liberal democracies. During the past decades, Taiwan went through several constitutional amendments, emphasizing more on reforms of government structure than on contents of human rights. In comparison with many other countries that continuously renew their bills of human rights, Taiwan's protection of human rights obviously lags behind in this respect. As the operation of government is closely linked to human rights and people's interests, it's necessary to formulate a concrete system of human rights indicators and evaluation, in order to evaluate regularly if policies of human rights protection are fully implemented, and to assess the achievements in building a satisfactory system of human rights protection. The article bases its analysis on existing system of human rights indicators and evaluation, which are constructed by Freedom House and widely accepted as one of the most authoritative NGOs working in the field of human rights. Having combined global experiences and local adaptation, the author wishes to answer how the government can gradually formulate a viable system of human rights indicators and evaluation, with the aim to establish a comprehensive system of human rights indicators, and a fully practicable system for regular government evaluation. A system as such will serve as an important benchmark for the development of human rights protection systems in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.李酉潭(20061100)。民主鞏固或崩潰:臺灣與俄羅斯之觀察(1995-2005年)。問題與研究,45(6),33-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李酉潭(19970600)。邁向鞏固的民主:臺灣案例。中山人文社會科學期刊,5(2)=12,161-196。  延伸查詢new window
3.李酉潭(20071000)。臺灣民主化經驗與中國未來的民主化--以杭亭頓的理論架構分析之。遠景基金會季刊,8(4),1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李酉潭、張孝評(20040700)。民主化與臺海和平之分析。問題與研究,43(4),1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李酉潭(2003)。台灣的自由、人權與民主--從自由之家的測量指標談起。人權與民主學術研討會。台北:政治大學。188-215。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bayefsky, Anne F.(2000)。The UN human rights treaty system in the 21st century。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。  new window
2.Blackburn, Robert、Busuttil, James J.(1997)。Human rights for the 21st century。London:Pinter。  new window
3.Chatterjee, Deen K.(2008)。Democracy in a global world: human rights and political participation in the 21st century。Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
4.Clapham, Andrew(2000)。Human rights : a very short introduction。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Karatnycky, Adrian(1997)。Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties。New York:Freedom House。  new window
6.Lillich, Richard B.(2006)。International human rights : problems of law, policy, and practice。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
7.O'Flaherty, Michael(1996)。Human rights and the UN:practice before the treaty bodies。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
8.Robinson, Mary(2006)。A voice for human rights。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
9.Smith, Rhona K. M(2007)。Texts & materials on international human rights。London:New York:Routledge-Cavendish:Routledge-Cavendish。  new window
10.沈宗靈、黃楠森主編、黃楠森(1993)。西方人權學說。中國成都:四川人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會(2008)。性別影響評估手冊。  延伸查詢new window
12.Forsythe, David P.、高德源(2002)。人權與國際關係。台北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
13.Donnelly, Jack、江素慧、國立編譯館(2007)。普世人權:理論與實踐。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lauren, Paul Gordon、徐子婷、楊雅婷、司馬學文(2008)。國際人權的進展。台北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
15.Clarke, Paul B.、Foweraker, Joe(2001)。Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought。London。  new window
16.Dworkin, Ronald、司馬學文(200709)。人權與民主生活。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
17.Buergentha, Thomas、楊雅婷、陳文暉(2007)。國際人權概觀。台北:韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
18.Steiner, Henry J.、Alston, Philip、Goodman, Ryan(2008)。International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
19.Dahl, Robert Alan(1998)。On Democracy。Yale University Press。  new window
20.Sorensen, George(1998)。Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World。Oxford:Westview Press。  new window
21.Wiseberg, Laurie S.(1993)。Defending Human Rights Defenders: The Importance of Freedom of Association for Human Rights NGOs。Montreal:International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development。  new window
22.Freeman, Michael(2002)。Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
23.張佛泉(1993)。自由與人權。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張鈿富(2001)。教育指標理念簡介。當代教育指標國際比較觀點。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE