臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：生物科技發明的「公序良俗」條款與憲法基本權利之適用問題
書刊名：銘傳大學法學論叢
作者：王服清 引用關係／許炳華
作者(外文)：Wang, Fu-ching／Hsu, Pin-hua
出版日期：2009
卷期：11
頁次：頁113-225
主題關鍵詞：公序良俗；公共秩序；善良風俗；倫理道德；生物科技；發明；基本權利；研究自由；人性尊嚴；專利；Ordre public and morality；Public order；Morality；Biotechnology；Invention；Fundamental rights；Freedom of research；Human dignity；Patent
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2135
  • 點閱點閱:76
期刊論文
1.Gardner, Peter J.(2004)。Our Intellectual Property World: Charting a Course from Ancient Native Cultures to the Threshold of the Future on a Roiled Sea of Macroeconomics, Morality and Ethics。Idea，44，105+237。  new window
2.Debra L.、Greenfield J. D.(2003)。Greenberg v. Miami Children’s Hospital: Unjust Enrichment and the Patenting of Human Genetic Material。Ann.health L.，15，213+274。  new window
3.Morin, Eileen(1997)。Of Mice and Men: The Ethics of Patenting Animals。Health Law Journal，5。  new window
4.Ragavan, Srividhya(2001)。Protection of Traditional Knowledge。MINN. INTELL. PROP. REV.，2(1)，27-32。  new window
5.Helfer, Laurence R.(2003)。Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexistence?。Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology，5，47。  new window
6.Brownsword, Roger(2005)。Stem Cells and Cloning: Where the Regulatory Consenus Falls。New Eng.L.Rev.，39，535。  new window
7.Gargano, Brain(2005)。The Quagmire of DNA Patents: Are DNA Sequences More Than Chemical Compositions of Matter。Syracuse Sci.&Tech L.Rep，3。  new window
8.Stankovic, Bratislav(2005)。Patenting the Minotaur。Rich.J.L.&Tech，12，5。  new window
9.Kevles, Daniel J.、Berkowitz, Ari(2001)。The Gene Patenting Controversy : A Convergence of Law、Economics Interests and Ethics。Brooklyn L.Rev，67，233。  new window
10.Vaver, David(2004)。Canada’s Intellectual Property Framework : A Comparative Overview。I.P.J.，17，125。  new window
11.Nico, Diannel(2005)。On The Legality of Gene Patents。Melbourne U.L.R，29，809。  new window
12.Gitter, Donna M.(2001)。Led Astray by Moral Compass : Incorporating Morality into European Union Biotechnology Patent Law。Berkeley J.Int’l L.，19，1。  new window
13.Duane Nash, M.D(2002)。Rocommended Response for Human Cloning Patent Applications。Idea，142，279。  new window
14.Vogelsang-Wenke, Heike(2004)。Patenting of Stem Cells and Processes Involving Stem Cells According to the Rules of the European Patent Convention。Biotechlr，23，155。  new window
15.Paradis, Jordan(2004)。Eueopean Opposition to Control Over Predictive Cancer Testing and the Inherent Implications for U.S.Patent Law and Public Policy : A Case Study of the Myriad Genetics’BRCA Patent Controversy。Food Drag L.J.，59，133。  new window
16.Restaino, Lesli G.、Halpem, Steven E.、Tang, Eric L.(2003)。Patenting DNA-Related Inventions in the Europe Union,United States and Japan: A Trilateral Approach or A Study in Contrast。UCLA J.L.&Tech，2。  new window
17.Bagley, Margo A.(2003)。Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law。William and Mary Law Review，45(2)，469-547。  new window
18.Chavez, Mark(2003)。Gene Patenting : Do the Ends Justify the Means。Comp. L. Rev_&Tech.J.，7，225。  new window
19.Kamber, Matthias(2003)。Coming Out of the Maze : Canada Grants the Harvard Mouse Patent。Geo.Wash.Int’l.Rev，35，761。  new window
20.Kim, Mikyung(2005)。An Overview of the Regulation and Patentability of Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in the United States and Anti-Cloning Legislation in South Koera。Santa Clara Computer&High Tech.LJ，21，645。  new window
21.Momeault, Monique(2005)。Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning: Where Do We Draw the Line ?。New Eng.L.Rev.，39，523。  new window
22.de Carvalho, Nuno Pires(2004)。The Problem of Gene Patents。Wash.U.GIobal StudL.Rev，3，701。  new window
23.Yu, Peter K.(2006)。The First Ten Years of the TRIPs Agreement : TRIPs and Its Discontents。Marq.InteIl.PropL.Rev，10，369。  new window
24.Brownsword, Roger(2004)。Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas for A New Millennium。Med.L.Rev.，12，14。  new window
25.Crespi, R.Stephen(2003)。Patenting and Ethics--A Dubious Connection。J.Pat.& Trademark Off.Soc’y，85，31。  new window
26.Schmieder, Sandra(2004)。Scope of Biotechnology Inventions in the United and in Europe。Santa Clara Computers&High TechJ，21，163。  new window
27.Philips, Valerie J.(2005)。Half-Human Creatures,Plants&Indigenous Peoples : Musings on Ramifications of Western Notions of Intellectual Property and the Newman-Rifkin Attempt to Patent a Theoretical Half-Human Creature。Santa Clara Computer and High Tech，21，83+383。  new window
28.Harty, William W.(1998)。Morality : The Starting Place for the Debate Over Human Cloning。Regent U.L.Rev，11，353。  new window
29.Cripps, Yvonne(2004)。The Art Science of Genetic Modification : Re-Engineering Patent Law and Constitutional Orthodoxies。IndJ.Global Legal Stud，11，1。  new window
30.余信達(20041000)。從人性尊嚴與倫理道德之定位探索基因相關技術之可專利性。月旦法學，113，175-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.王服清(20051200)。「歐盟生物科技專利指令」之淺析。財產法暨經濟法，4，71-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.李惠宗(20011200)。禁譜辦公室戀曲--「基本權第三人效力」或「基本權衝突」。月旦法學，79，8-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.孫玉苓、林志生、周佑吉(20030800)。我國專利法下人類胚幹細胞相關發明可專利性之研究。科技法律透析，15(8)，31-45。  延伸查詢new window
34.陳英鈐(20060400)。人類胚胎幹細胞專利與胚胎保護--一部98/44/EC指令各自表述。科技法學評論，3(1)，75-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳文吟(20030700)。專利制度就基因工程發展的因應之道。應用倫理研究通訊，27，25-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳英鈐(2001)。人類胚胎幹細胞議題。政大法學評論，67，34。  延伸查詢new window
37.陳春生(1999)。基因工程應用之憲法問題。憲政時代，25(2)，39-48。  延伸查詢new window
38.張文貞、牛惠之(20030700)。淺談人類基因專利：科技發展、倫理與法律的三角習題。應用倫理研究通訊，27，42-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.魏衍亮、葉東蕾(20030800)。從公序良俗原則看中國大陸的制度變遷。東吳法律學報，15(1)，285-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Morrow, A. David、Ingram, Colin B.(2005)。Of Transgenic Mice and Roundup Ready Canola : The Decisions of Supeeme Court of Canada in Harvard College v. Canada Monsanto v. Schmeiser。U.B.C.L.Rev.，38，189。  new window
41.Brashear, Andeea D.(2001)。Envolving Biotechnology Patent Laws in the United States and Europe: Are They Inhibiting Disease Research。Ind.Int' l&Comp.L.Rev.，12，183。  new window
42.Oddi, A. Samuel(2006)。Regeneration in American Patent Law: Statutory Subject Matter。Idea，46，491。  new window
43.Pitcher, Amanda S.(2003)。Symposium: ’’At the Crossroads~ Public/Private Priorities Concerning Access to Genetic Information”: Comment to First Impression,Genes are Patentable: Should There be Limitations。J. Health Care L. & Pol’y，6，284。  new window
44.Meyers, Abbey S.(1996)。Genetics and the Law: The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Genetic Technology and Biomedical Ethics: "Intellectual Property at the Public-Private Divide: "A Response。U Chi L Sch Roundtable，3，581。  new window
45.Kamage, Andrea、Heider, Julie(2005)。The Blurry Biotech Line。IP Law & Business，2005(6)，46。  new window
46.Enerson, Benjamin D.(2004)。Protecting Society from Patently Offensive Inventions: The Risk of Reviving the Moral Utility Doctrine。Comell L.Rev.，89，685。  new window
47.Sommer, Andrew R.(2005)。Trouble on the Commons: A Lockean Justification for Patent Law Harmonization。J.Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc' y，87，141。  new window
48.Smith, Andrew R.(2003)。Monster at the Patent Office: The Inconsistent Conclusions of Moral Utility and the Controversy of Human Cloning。Depaul L.Rev.，53，159。  new window
49.Macintosh, Constance(2005)。Indigenous Self-Determination and Research on Human Genetic Material。Health L.J.，13，213。  new window
50.Ho, Cynthia M.(2000)。Patent Law and Policy Symposium: Re-Engineering Patent Law: The Challenge of New Techologies: PartIII: International and Comparative Law Issues: Splicing Morality and Patent Law: Issues? Arising from Mixing Mice and Men。Wash. U. J. L. & POl' y，2，247。  new window
51.Ho, Cynthia M.(2002)。Biotechnology Symposium: Who Deserves the Patent Pot of Gold ?: An Inquiry into the Proper Inventorship of Patent-Based Discoveries。Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y，2002，107。  new window
52.Smith, Cynthia(2005)。A Practical Guide to Chinese Patent Law。Seton Hall Legis. J.，29，643。  new window
53.Vidergar, Cyril R.(2002)。Biomedical Patening: Permitted, But Permissible ?。Santa Clara Computer & High Tech L.J.，19，253。  new window
54.Bennett, D. Scott(2006)。Chimera and the Continuum of Humanity: Erasing the Line of Constitutional Personhood。Emory L.J.，55，347。  new window
55.Thomas, David、Richards, Georgina A.(2004)。The Importance of the Morality Exception Under the European Patent Convention: The Oncomouse Case Continues。E.I.P.R.，26(3)，97-104。  new window
56.Vaver, David(2002)。Need Intellectual Property be Everywhere ? Against Ubiquity and Uniformity。Dalhouse L.J.，25，1。  new window
57.McCall, Diana D.(2003)。Stating the Obvious: Patents and Biological Material。U.III.J. L.Tech. & Pol’y，2003，239。  new window
58.Gitter, Donna M.(2001)。International Conflicts Over Patenting Human DNA Sequences in the United States and the European Union – An Argument for Compulsory Licensing and A Fair-Use Exemption。N.Y.U.L.Rev.，76，1623。  new window
59.Toumi, Emma(2004)。EC: Patents-Biotech Patents-Questions of Morality。E.LRR，26(2)，N15-16。  new window
60.Gold, E. Richard(2000)。Biomedical Patents and Ethics 'A Canadian Solution。McGill L.J.，45，413。  new window
61.Pellegrino, E. D.(2002)。Balancing Science、Ethics and Politics: Stem Cell Research、A Paradigm Case。J.Contemp.Health L.&Pol’y，18，591。  new window
62.Greely, Henry T.(2006)。Neuroethics and ELSI: Similarities and Differences。Min.J L.Sci &Tech.，7，599。  new window
63.Bender, Erin Kathleen(2003)。North and South : The WTO、TRIPS and The Source of Biopiracy。Tulsa J.Comp. & Int'l.，11，281。  new window
64.Wei Sze Shun, George(2003)。Mus Musculus and Homo Sapiens–Metaphyics and the Canadian Supreme Court。Sing.J. Legal Stud.，2003，38。  new window
65.Washko, Frank M.(2006)。Current Development 2005-2006: Should Ethics Play a Special Rple in Patent Law?。Geo.J.Legal Ethics，19，1027。  new window
66.Mgbeoji, Ikechi(2004)。The “Terminator"Patent and Discontents :Rethinking the Normative Deficit in Utility Test of Modern Patent Law。St Thomas L.Rev.，17，95。  new window
67.Koopman, Jerzy(2002)。The Patentibility of Transgenic Animals in United States of American and the European Union: A Proposal for Harmonization。Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent.L.J.，13，103。  new window
68.Jones, Jackie(2004)。" Common Constitutional Traditions” : Can Meaning Human Dignity under German Law Guide the European Court of Justice。P. L., SPR，2004，167-187。  new window
69.Williams, J. Jason(2005)。rotecting the Frontiers of Biotechnology Beyond the Genome: The Limits of Patent Law in the Face of the Proteomics Revolution。Vand. L. Rev.，58，955。  new window
70.Chen, Jim。There’s No Such Thing as Biopiravy......and It's a Good Thing。McGeorge L.Rev.，37，1。  new window
71.Spindler, Karen A.(2001)。Current Patent Protection Grantedfor Genetically Modified Organisms under the European Patent Convention and the Scandal of EP 0695351。Santa Clara Computer & High Tech L.J3，18，95。  new window
72.Jordan K.Paradise(2005)。Recent Developments - Lessons from the European Union: The Need for a Post-Grant Mechanism for Third-Party Challenge to U.S Patents。Minn.J.L.Sci.&Tech.，1，315。  new window
73.Kevin J.Nowak(2005)。Staying Within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in TRIPS Article。Mich.J.Int’l，27，899。  new window
74.Cirlin, Lauren(2003)。Human or Animal: A Resolution to the Biotechnological Blurring of the Lines。Sw.U.Rev.，32，501。  new window
75.Nathan A.Adams, IV(2004)。Creating Clones、Kids & Chimera: Liberal Democratic Compromise at the Crossroads。Issues L. & Med.，20，3。  new window
76.Malinowski, Michael J.、Rao, Radhika(2004)。Legal History and Legal Theory: Legal Limitations on Genetic Research and the Commercialization of its Results。Am. J.Comp L.，54，45。  new window
77.Campbell, Randy L.(2003)。Global Patent Law Harmonization: Benefits and Implemenation。Ind.Int’l &Comp.L.Rev.，13，605。  new window
78.Brownsword, Roger(2003)。Ahrens Torts Seminar Genomic Torts: An Interest in Human Dignity as the Basis for Genomic Torts。Washburn L.J.，42，413。  new window
79.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(1996)。Genetics and the Law - The Ethical、Legal、and Social Implications of Genetic Technology and Biomedical Ethics : Intellectual Property at the Public-Private Divide : The Case of Large-Scale cDNA Sequencing。U Chi L Sch Roundtable，3，557。  new window
80.Guerra, Richard(2003)。Therapeutic Cloning as Proper Subject Matter for Patent Eligibilty。Idea，41，695。  new window
81.Epstein, Richard A.(1996)。Genetics and the Law: The Ethical、Legal、and Social Implications of Genetic Technology and Biomedical Ethics: Property Rights in cDNA Sequences: A New Resident for the Public Domain。U Chi L Sch Roundtable，3，575。  new window
82.Coughlin, Sean M.(2006)。The Newman Application and the Uspto ,sUnnecessary Response: Patentability of Humans and Human Embryos。Chi. Kent J. Mell. Prop.，5，90。  new window
83.Muscati, Sina(2005)。Terminator Techology - Protection or a Threat to the Patent System。IDEA，45，477。  new window
84.Wei, Tanya(2003)。Patenting Genomic Techology-2001 Utility Examination Guidelines: An Incomplete Remrdy in Need of Prompt Reform。Santa Clara L.Rev.，44，307。  new window
85.Oriola, Taiwo A.(2002)。Ethical and Legal Issues in Singapore Biomedical Research。Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal，11(3)，498-529。  new window
86.Spranger, Tade Matthias(2002)。Europe’s Biotech Patent Landscape: Conditions and Recent Developments。Minn.Intell.Prop.Rev.，3，235。  new window
87.Lim, Wendy(2003)。Towards Developing a Natural Law Jurisprudence in he U.S. Patent System。Santa Clara Computers & High Tech.L.J.，19，559。  new window
88.Kongolo, Tshimanga(2002)。Morocco’s Patent System and its International Connection。IDEA，42，181。  new window
89.Vinciguerra, Vincenzo(2006)。A Brief Essay on Importance of Time in International Conventions of Intellectual Property Rights。Akron L.Rev.，39，635。  new window
90.Chang, Wesley(2004)。Note - ArrestedDevelopment - Patent Laws,Embryonic Stem Cell Research,and the Organ Black Market。Sw.J.L&Trade Am.，10，407。  new window
91.許育典(20030500)。學術自由在宗教大學的實踐--天主教大學憲章案的合憲性探討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(3)，65-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
92.許耀華(20051000)。由愛丁堡一案探討歐洲專利局對人類胚胎幹細胞可專利性之立場。政大智慧財産評論，3(2)，43-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
93.馮達發(20021200)。關於生物相關發明專利審査基準之淺論。萬國法律，126，57-62。  延伸查詢new window
94.Lori, B.、Andrews, J. D.、Jordan Paradise, J. D.(2005)。Gene Patents: The Need for Bioethics Scrutiny and Legal Change。Yale J.Health Pol’y L.& Ethics，5，403。  new window
95.Nenow, Lydia(2001)。To Patent or Not to Patent: The European Union's New Biotech Directive。Houston Journal of International Law，23，569。  new window
96.Nwabuezie, Remigius N.(2005)。What Can Genomics and Health Biotechnology Do for Developing Countries?。AlbL.J.Sci&Tech.，15，369。  new window
97.Ghosh, Shubha(2004)。Patents and the Regulatory State : Rethinking the Patent Bargain Metaphor after Eldred。Berkeley TechJ，19，1315+1367。  new window
98.許育典(20051200)。多元文化國下色情管制的憲法正當性--以中央大學性／別研究室動物戀網頁案為例。東吳法律學報，17(2)，1-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
99.Cann, Jr. Wesley A.(2004)。On the Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights and the Need of Less-Developed Countries for Access to Pharmaceuticals: Creating Legal Duty to Supply under a Theopy of Progressive Global Constitutionalism。U.PaJ.Infl Econ.L.，25(3)，755-944。  new window
100.李惠宗(20051100)。死後取精 基本權與人性尊嚴的衝突？。月旦法學教室，37，6-7。  延伸查詢new window
101.劉憶成(20050600)。專利審查應否援用公序良俗作為審定之標準--從人類胚胎幹細胞之可專利性談起。銘傳大學法學論叢，4，197-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
102.謝銘洋、宋皇志(20041000)。基因轉殖植物的智慧財產權保護。清華科技法律與政策論叢，1(1)，165-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
103.牛惠之(20050100)。「科技法律」議題之研究。月旦法學，116，191-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
104.Jackson, Christopher(2004)。Learning from the Mistakes of the Past: Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Genetic Research。Richmond Journal of Law & Technology，11，4。  new window
105.Bagley, Margo A.(2005)。Stem cells, cloning and patents: what's morality got to do with it?。New England Law Review，39(3)，501-509。  new window
106.李震山(20030200)。行政權得依法介入私權爭執之法理基礎。臺灣本土法學雜誌，43，123-127。  延伸查詢new window
107.Chambers, Jasemine(2002)。Patent Eligibility of Biotechnological Inventions in the United States, Europe, and Japan: How much patent policy is public policy?。The George Washington International Law Review，34(1)，226。  new window
108.謝銘洋(20030100)。從歐洲觀點探討幹細胞相關發明之可專利性。生物科技與法律研究通訊，17/18，118-123。  延伸查詢new window
109.周志宏、陳春生、陳慈陽(19991000)。「生物科技與憲法」學術研討會。憲政時代，25(2)，3-60。  延伸查詢new window
110.何建志(20030700)。基因專利違反道德？。應用倫理研究通訊，27，55-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
111.范建得、胡均立、邱永和(20021200)。自經濟分析之觀點論我國生物科技應有之財產法制。全國律師，6(12)，9-28。  延伸查詢new window
112.陳志忠(20030700)。專利法上公序良俗條款初探：以基因生物體為例。應用倫理研究通訊，27，64-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
113.陳俊寰(20030500)。生物科技專利申請之可實施性要件。智慧財產權，53，18-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
114.李震山(20030500)。基本權各論基礎講座(1)--人性尊嚴。法學講座，17，1-17。  延伸查詢new window
115.李震山(20011200)。「複製人」科技發展對既有法律思維與制度之衝擊--以基本權利保障為例。月旦法學，79，158-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
116.陳文吟(19970700)。從美國核准動物專利之影響評估動物專利之利與弊。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，26(4)，173-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
117.Whelan, Marina L.(2006)。What、if Any, are the Ethical Obligations of the U.S.Patent Office ? A Closer Look at the Biological Sampling of Indigenous Gropes。Duke L.&Tech.Rev.，2006，14。  new window
118.程明修(20041000)。契約自由與國家之保護義務。憲政時代，30(2)，195-227。  延伸查詢new window
119.蔡維音(19920700)。德國基本法第一條「人性尊嚴」規定之探討。憲政時代，18(1)，36-48。  延伸查詢new window
120.陳文吟(20011200)。由胚胎幹細胞研究探討美國專利法上「道德」實用性因應生物科技的必要性。臺北大學法學論叢，49，179-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
121.李震山(20030800)。憲法中基本權利保障規範間之關係。臺灣本土法學雜誌，49，127-133。  延伸查詢new window
122.Nard, Craig Allen(2003)。In Defense of Geographic Disparity。MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW，88，222。  new window
123.Ewelukwa, Uché(2005)。Patent Wars in the Valley of the Shadow of Death: The Pharmaceutical Industry, Ethics, and Global Trade。UNIVERSITY MIAMI LAW REVIEW，59，203。  new window
會議論文
1.李建良(200103)。論基本權利的位階秩序與司法審查標準。第三屆憲法解釋之理論與實務學術研討會。中央研究院。51。  延伸查詢new window
2.李素華(200410)。胚胎幹細胞之國際法律趨勢與對我國之啓發--以歐盟及德國新近法制發展爲中心。基因倫理問題與科技管制法規學術硏討會。台北：東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宗珍(2000)。人體基因科技研究自由及其界限。世界人權宣言50週年紀念研討會。臺灣法學會。344+347。  延伸查詢new window
4.王服清(200611)。歐盟的倫理道德觀點--檢視，人類幹細胞可專利性之問題。2006智慧財產權法制國際學術研討會。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王服清(2006)。憲法<人性尊嚴>條款對於生物科技之效力-以人類胚胎之法律地位為探討中心。憲政體制與民主政治學術研討會。國立彰化師範大學政治學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡維音(199904)。<人性尊嚴>作為人類基因工轾之基礎法律規範理念--『人性尊嚴』作為法律概念其内涵開展之可能性。人類基因組計畫之倫理、法律與社會涵意學術研討會。中央大學哲學研究所暨應用倫理學研究室。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳英鈐(200103)。生物醫學的研究自由與控制。第三屆憲法解釋之理論與實務學術研討會。中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳英鈴(2003)。人類胚胎幹細胞研究管制的根本問題。第三屆行政法實務與理論學術研討會，臺北高等行政法院等主辦 12。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.顏上詠。歐盟生物科技專利指令-以人性尊嚴為核心論生物科技發明之法律保護。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉憶成(2004)。人類胚胎幹細胞研究與應用之可專利性研究(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李順典(2005)。動物專利之探討(碩士論文)。南台科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂文銓(2005)。專利權之本質研究-論專利權之社會化(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳文貴(200007)。基本權力對民事私法之規範效力-以德國法為中心(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳彥宏(2002)。論動物利益的平等考量與衡量(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳珮琳(2005)。生物材料專利對科技發展之衝擊及其可能管制方式之探討--以胚胎幹細胞為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡瑞傑(2005)。胚胎幹細胞治療複製可專利性之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.游彥城(2005)。以生殖為目的使用與處分人類精卵法律問題之研究(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭美杏(1998)。智慧財產權共有之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.廖哲宏(2005)。論研究自由基本權之保障與限制—以榮陽團隊執行人類第四號染色體定序計畫為中心—(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.林怡芊(2004)。歐盟98/44號生物技術發明保護指令中專利適格標的之研究(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.林輝雄(2002)。人性尊嚴與自由民主憲法秩序關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊子賢(2005)。政府提供資訊行為法制化之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
14.秦季芳(1994)。概括條款之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.CARVALHO, NUNO PIRES DE(2002)。THE TRIPS REGIME OF PATENT RIGHTS。Kluwer Law International。  new window
2.許育典(2002)。學術自由作為大學法制的核心建構--二--退學憲法爭議的省思。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳新民(1991)。憲法基本權利之基本理論。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.史尚寬(1980)。債法總論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.李念祖(2006)。案例憲法III ( 上）--人權保障的內容。三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.阿部照哉等、周宗憲(200103)。憲法。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.范建得、胡均立、邱永和(200305)。自經濟分析之觀點論我國生物科技應有之財產法制。基因技術挑戰與法律回應。學林文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.薩孟武(2002)。中國憲法新論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bodenheimer, Edgar、結構群(1980)。法理學--法哲學其方法。結構群文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.芦部信喜、李鴻禧(1997)。憲法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
11.王澤鑑(1995)。民法實例研習：民法總則。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.(2003)。DANIEL GERVAILS’THE TRIPs AGREEMENT: DRAFTING HISTORY AND NALYSIS。SWEET & MAXWELL。  new window
13.GOLDBERG, RICHARD、LONBAY, JULIAN(2000)。PHARMACEUTICALS MEDICINE,BIOTECHOLOGY AND EUROPEAN LAW。CAMBRJDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS。  new window
14.(2000)。DORIS ESTELLE LONQA COURSE BOOK IN INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY。  new window
15.WESTERLUND, LI(2002)。BIOTECH PATENTS EQUIVELANCE AND EXCLUSIONS UNDER EUROPE AND U.S PATENT LAW。KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL。  new window
16.McClatchey, Katrina(2004)。The European Patent Office and the European Patent: An Open Avenue for Biotechologists and “Living Inventions ”。Okla.J.L & Tech。  new window
17.Tanja Barton, Der(2004)。ordre public, als Grenze der Biopatentierung:Konkretisierung und Funktion der Vorbehalte zum，ordre public” und zum menschlichen Korper in der EG-Biopatent-Richtline einschlieBlich der Umsetyung ins deutsche Recht。Erich Schmidt Verlag。  new window
18.蘇永欽(200205)。走入新世紀的私法自治。台北：元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭玉波(200207)。民法總則實例研究。五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.李文賢(2005)。專利法要論。臺北：翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.Grubb, Philip W.(2004)。PATENTS FOR CHEMICALS, PHARMACEUTICALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY。OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS。  new window
22.李震山(20020200)。人性尊嚴與人權保障。元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳慈陽(200511)。憲法學。臺北：陳慈陽。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳庚(200304)。憲法之解釋與適用。台北：吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
25.黃立(1999)。民法總則。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
26.李惠宗(20060900)。憲法要義。臺北市：月旦。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳敏(2004)。行政法總論。臺北：新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.王澤鑑(1998)。侵權行為法。臺北：三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.李惠宗(2004)。憲法要義。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
30.陳自強(2002)。契約之成立與生效。臺北：學林文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.許育典(2006)。憲法。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
32.曾淑瑜(20030000)。生命科學與法規範之調和。臺北：翰蘆圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.李震山(2005)。多元、寬容與人權保障--以憲法未列舉權之保障為中心。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.吳庚(200508)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.蕭淑芬(2005)。基本權基礎理論之繼受與展望：臺日比較。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.曾世雄(20050000)。民法總則之現在與未來。臺北：元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.姚志明(2005)。侵權行為法。臺北：元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
2.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
3.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
4.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
5.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
6.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
7.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
8.政治大學智慧財產研究所網站案例，誰偷了我的樹-India’s Neems，http://iip.nccu.edu.tw/iip/NEW-iip/page/review/reviewl-920124.htm， 2009/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
9.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
10.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
11.總統府公報。  延伸查詢new window
12.(2003)。歐盟執委會控告八個成員國，因其未轉換生物科技專利指令(IP/03/991, 10.07.2003 )，http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleas， 2009/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
13.Stand der Umsetzung (09.06.2006),in: STATE OF PLAY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF IRECTIVE 98/44/EC，http://ec.europa.eu/intemal_market/indprop/invent/index_de.htm， 2009/03/31。  new window
14.(2002)。Bunderstag 14th Legislative Period Document 14/9020。  new window
圖書論文
1.姜悌文(1997)。行政法上之明確性原則。行政法之一般法律原則。臺北市：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.周志宏(1997)。學術自由與科技研究應用之法律規範。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(1994)。勞動契約上之單身條款、基本人權與公序良俗。民法學說與判例研究。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.法治斌(2003)。法治國家與表意自由。憲法專論。正典出版文化有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.張文貞(200601)。當科技遇上憲法--憲政主義的危機與轉機。部門憲法。元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳洸岳(2001)。動機與違背公序良俗之約定。民法總則實例問題分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳則銘(200310)。Neem Tree專利爭議案。智慧財產法律與管理案例評析。華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.董保城(199707)。課程自主、考試評量與學術自由。教育法與學術自由。月旦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.董保城(200603)。國家與公立大學之監督關係及其救濟程序。法治與權力救濟。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.顏厥安(2000)。財產、人格，還是資訊？論人類基因的法律地位。基因技術挑戰與法律回應。學林文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.KEVLES, DANIEL J.(2002)。A HISTORY OF PATENTING LIFE IN THE UNITED STATES WITH COMPARATIVE ATTENTION TO EUROPE AND CANADA。EUROPE GROUP ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO THE EUROPE COMMISSION。LUXEMBOURG：OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES。  new window
12.Van Overwalle, Geertrui、Baumgartner, Christopf(2003)。Legal and Ethical Aspects of Bio-Patenting-Critical Analysis of the EU Biotechology Directive, in: Patente am Leben?。mentis Verlag Gmbh。  new window
13.Frahm, Katharina、Gebauer, Jochen(2002)。Patent auf Leben?: der Luxemburger Gerichtshof und die Biopatent-Richtlinie。Europarecht 。  new window
14.Calliess, Christian、Meiser, Christian(2002)。Menschenwtirde und Biotechnologie: Die EG-Biopatentrichtlinie auf dem Priifstand des europaischen Verfassnngsrechts - EuGH，EuZW 2001, 691。JuS。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1296（臺灣：1286，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68327223
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上