:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:東豐綠廊自行車休閒活動之休閒效益與滿意度之研究
書刊名:嶺東體育暨休閒學刊
作者:王怡菁
作者(外文):Wang, Yi-ching
出版日期:2010
卷期:8
頁次:頁113-130
主題關鍵詞:休閒效益滿意度自行車活動東豐綠廊自行車道Benefit of leisureSatisfactionCycling activitiesDong Feng green Corridor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:67
本研究主要目的是在探討台中縣東豐綠廊自行車道的參與者在進行自行車休閒活動時所體驗的休閒效益與滿意度程度。採問卷調查法以自編量表的方式於2009年11月周休二日假期間,到東豐綠廊自行車專用道遊客中心門口進行立意隨機抽樣調查,共計發放430份問卷,扣除45份填答不完整,共計回收385份有效問卷達89%回收率,經由SPSS 12.0版統計軟體進行分析,以描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析(One-Way ANOVA)、Scheffe事後比較等統計方式所獲得的結果如下:(一)本研究的樣本人口分佈是以男、女性比例均等,未婚者居多,年齡層在20-40歲之間,具有大專大學學歷者,平均月收入在四萬元以下,居住在中部地區居多的樣本特性。(二)在休閒效益的心理因素平均值爲3.84、生理因素平均值爲3.70、社交因素平均值爲3.87,在滿意度各因素的平均值爲3.65。(三)在性別、婚姻狀況、不同年齡、不同教育程度、不同職業、在不同平均月收入方面均有顯著差異情況產生。最後依據結果對相關規劃單位與經營業者提出建議。
The purpose of this study is to explore the recreational benefits and satisfaction level experienced by cyclists while participating in cycling activities at the Dong Feng green corridor bicycle lane in Taichung County. Information was collected through a questionnaire survey by way of self-compiled tables. The random sample survey was carried out at the entrance to the visitors' center of Dong Feng green corridor bicycle lane on weekends during November, 2009. A total of 430 questionnaires were issued, and after deducting the 45 sets of incomplete questionnaires, the total number of valid questionnaire returned was 385, a recovery rate of 89%. They were then analyzed using the statistical software SPSS version 12.0 through methods such as descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe post-comparison, and so on. The results obtained are as follows: (a) Sample population distribution of this study consists of equal percentage of male and female, most of them are unmarried and are aged between 20-40 years old. The average monthly income of those with a college degree from the university is less than NT 40,000 yuan. Most of them live in the central region. (B) The average psychological factor of recreational benefits is 3.84, the average physiological factor is 3.70, the average social factor is 3.87, and the average value of all factors in satisfaction is 3.65. (3) Significant differences are observed in gender, marital status, age difference, difference in educational levels, occupation difference, and difference in average monthly income.Finally, recommendations were put forward to the relevant planning authorities and vendors based on study findings.
期刊論文
1.Madrigal, R.、Havitz, M.E.、Howard, D. R.(1992)。Married couples’involvement with family vacation. Leisure scicence。Leisure scicence,14,285-299。  new window
2.McIntyre, N.、Pigram, J.(1992)。Recretional specialization reexamined:The case of vehicle-based campers。Leisure Science,14,3-15。  new window
3.Tuan, Yi-fu(1977)。Rootedn palce。Landscape,24,3-8。  new window
4.Havitz, M. E.、Demanche, F.(1999)。Leisure involvement revisited: Diver properties and paradoxes。Journal of Leisure Research,31(2),122-149。  new window
5.Ritchie, B. W.(1998)。Bicycle tourism in the South Island of New Zealand: planning and management issues。Tourism Management,19(6),567-582。  new window
6.柴松林(19960900)。休閒時代、學習社會。北縣教育,14,33-38。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kyle, G. T.、Absher, J. D.、Graefe, A. R.(2003)。The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences。Leisure Sciences,25(1),33-50。  new window
8.Bricker, K. S.、Kerstetter, D. L.(2000)。Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists。Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal,22(4),233-257。  new window
9.Dimanche, F.、Havitz, M. E.、Howard, D. R.(1993)。Consumer involvement profiles as a tourism segmentation tool。Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing,1(4),35-52。  new window
10.張馨文(20050900)。自行車騎士遊憩環境偏好差異之研究--以北海岸國家風景區為例。觀光研究學報,11(3),259-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.高俊雄(19960400)。休閒概念面面觀。國立體育學院論叢,6(1),69-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.沈進成、謝金燕(20030600)。宗教觀光吸引力、滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究--以高雄佛光山為例。旅遊管理研究,3(1),79-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Selin, S. W.、Howard, D. R.(1988)。Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification。Journal of Leisure Research,20(3),237-244。  new window
14.Kyle, G. T.、Graefe, A. R.、Manning, R.、Bacon, J.(2003)。An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail。Journal of Leisure Research,35(3),249-273。  new window
15.Kyle, G.、Bricker, K.、Graefe, A. R.、Wickham, T.(2004)。An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings。Leisure Sciences,26(2),123-142。  new window
研究報告
1.交通部觀光局(2003)。觀光人口倍增計劃。台北市:交通部觀光局。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院經建會(2005)。挑戰2008-國家發展重點計劃。台北:行政院經建會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.賴允荃(2008)。自行車專用道使用者環境知覺與休閒行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊宏(2002)。捷運車站腳踏車停車需求研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.林建堯(1999)。自行車專用道環境屬性重要度研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭淑菁(2003)。登山社員休閒涉入、休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.方怡堯(2002)。溫泉遊客遊憩涉入與遊憩體驗關係之研究--以北投溫泉為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.顏妙珊(2006)。台北縣八里左岸自行車道遊客與管理者對環境屬性知覺差異之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.林欣慧(2002)。解說成效對休閒效益體驗之影響研究--以登山健行為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.林宜蔓(2004)。游泳者持續參與在休閒效益與幸福感之研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳水源(1988)。擁擠與戶外遊憩體驗關係之研究--社會心理層面之探討(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.廖明豊(2003)。東豐自行車綠廊之遊憩吸引力、服務品質與遊客滿意度及忠誠度之研究(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院體委會(2002)。自行車道設施設計準則彙編。台北:行政院體委會。  延伸查詢new window
2.張孝銘(200802)。休閒消費者行為。臺北:華都文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.高俊雄(2008)。運動休閒管理。臺北市:華都文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE