:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:桃園縣高中職數學教師信賴區間學科教學知識之研究
書刊名:教育科學期刊
作者:李宛臻袁媛 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Wan-chenYuan, Yuan
出版日期:2011
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁21-45
主題關鍵詞:學科教學知識信賴區間信心水準高中數學教師Pedagogical content knowledgeConfidence intervalConfidence levelHigh schoolMathematics teacher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:14
本研究以桃園縣高中職數學科教師為母群體,依學校規模分層隨機抽取11所學校的148位教師為研究對象,以問卷調查法研究教師於信賴區間的學科教學知識與教學現況,經收集資料分析後得結果如下:一、教師對於信賴區間也存在著迷思概念,尤其是教科書外的延伸概念,如不能正確掌握重覆取樣的意義及相信信心水準即機率等;二、求學時期曾修過統計學課程及具統計內容教學經驗之教師,其信賴區間的學科知識認知情況表現較佳,亦較贊同數學課程引入新統計概念之教學;三、教師對信賴區間概念的教學信心覺知較低,顯示教師較不具信心教好信賴區間概念;四、教師自覺具有足夠的學科教學專業知能時,於信賴區間的學科知識表現也愈好,反之亦然。
This study examined high school mathematics teachers in Taoyuan County. Based on school size, this study used a random sampling method to select 148 teachers from 11 schools. A questionnaire was designed to investigate teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and teaching present situations of confidence interval (CI), and several statistical analyses were employed, yielding the following results: 1. High school mathematics teachers exhibit misconceptions on confidence interval, such as repeated sampling and believing that a confidence level equals probability, especially when the concept of confidence interval was not covered in the textbook. 2. Teachers who previously enrolled in statistics courses or taught related statistical lessons perform higher on subject knowledge of CI. They also agree more frequently that random sampling concepts should be introduced in curricula. 3. High school mathematics teachers perceive a low level of teaching confidence in CI; that is, most teachers do not agree that they have the confidence to teach this concept. 4. Teachers who exhibited a higher level of awareness of professional subject matter demonstrate superior understanding of CI, and vice versa.
期刊論文
1.丁村成(20050300)。從標準差除以n或除以n-1談起。數學傳播,29(1)=113,9-17。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁村成(20101200)。談高中新教材中機率統計的缺失與改進。數學傳播,34(4)=136,9-23。  延伸查詢new window
3.何金針(20060600)。學校本位課程與高職教師專業發展。北縣教育,56,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
4.曹亮吉(1985)。二項分布與大數法則:理論與實際相連。科學月刊,16(6),425-428。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉耕非(2007)。解構數學權威的真面目。科學月刊,38(10),770-773。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝哲仁(20020400)。基本統計學之動態電腦教學設計。美和技術學院學報,20,142-160。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴敦生(2008)。或然率、機率、隨機變數,高中數學40年教材變遷洛克史。建中學報,14,155-188。  延伸查詢new window
8.張靜儀(20040900)。以合作行動研究探討知識管理與科學教師專業成長團之運作。臺北市立師範學院學報. 人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類,35(2),231-257。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃萬居、熊瑞棻(20040900)。新世紀國小科學教師專業素養之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報. 人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類,35(2),201-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Angeli, C.、Valanides, N.(2009)。Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge。Computers and Education,52(1),154-168。  new window
11.Niederhauser, D. S.、Stoddart, T.(2001)。Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software。Teaching and Teacher Education,17(1),15-31。  new window
12.Cochran, K. F.、DeRuiter, J. A.、King, R. A.(1993)。Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation。Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272。  new window
13.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
14.張世忠、管世應、謝幸芬(2009)。大學生知覺新進教師PCK 之個案研究。數理學科教學知能,2009(1),1-20。  延伸查詢new window
15.Garfield, J.、Ben-Zvi, D.(2007)。How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics。International Statistical Review,75(3),372-396。  new window
會議論文
1.Vermette, S.、Gattuso, L.、Bourdeau, M.(200505)。Data analysis or how high school students "read" statistics。Symposium conducted at the meeting of IASE satellite conferences。Sydney, Australia。  new window
研究報告
1.任眉眉(2004)。統計概念與應用網路學習研究 (計畫編號:NSC92-2521-S-006-001)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭天澤(2000)。機率統計之概念暨網路學習研究--子計劃三:高中職教師對機率統計課程認知之現況了解及改進研究 (計畫編號:NSC 89-2511-S-004-001)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江月雲(2009)。高中數學常態分配教材設計與學習成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱婉嘉(2009)。台灣與美國高中信賴區間單元教材內容之分析比較(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉正湖(2000)。國中自然地理迷思概念之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Best, Joel、張淑貞、何玉方(2008)。統計數字:是事實,還是謊言?。臺北市:商周。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃文璋(2003)。隨機思考論。臺北市:華泰。  延伸查詢new window
3.Iversen, G. R.、Gergen, M.(1997)。Statistics: The conceptual approach。New York:Springer。  new window
4.Paulos, J. A.(1988)。Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences。New York:Randon House。  new window
5.Smithson, M.(2003)。Confidence intervals。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
6.Moore, D. S.、鄭唯厚(1998)。統計,讓數字說話!。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Moore, David S.、鄭惟厚(2002)。統計學的世界。臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Huff, Darrell、鄭惟厚(2005)。別讓統計數字騙了你。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wallace, J.、Louden, W.(2000)。Teachers' learning: Stories of science education。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
10.Salsburg, D.(2001)。The lady tasting tea: How statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century。New York:Henry Holt and Company。  new window
11.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
其他
1.張海潮(2008)。九五數學暫綱修訂的經過,http://mathcenter.ck.tp.edu.tw/Resources/Ctrl/ePaper/eArticleDetail.aspx?id=be9a61ab-b55d-46fb-89e3-0fc8db288ff2。  new window
2.黃文璋(2010)。談高中數學裡的交叉分析,http://mathcenter.ck.tp.edu.tw/Resources/Ctrl/ePaper/eArticleDetail. aspx?id=d860bbfc-0c77-409f-b18e-8ce491af9e4d。  new window
3.Garfield, J. B.,DelMas, R. C.,Chance, B.(2000)。Tools for teaching and assessing statistical inference,http://www.tc.umn.edu/~delma001/stat_tools/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Carter, K.、Doyle, W.(1987)。Teachers' knowledge structure and comprehension process。Exploring teachers' thinking。London:Cassel。  new window
2.Shaughnessy, J. M.(1992)。Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。New York, NY:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE