臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣、美國與新加坡國中階段幾何教材內容之分析比較
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：楊德清 引用關係／鄭婷芸
作者(外文)：Yang, Der-ching／Cheng, Ting-yun
出版日期：2015
卷期：60:1
頁次：頁33-72
主題關鍵詞：國中階段；連結數學；幾何；新課程數學；Middle school；Connected mathematics program；Geometry；New syllabus mathematics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:36
期刊論文
1.Ding, M.、Li, X.(2010)。A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks。Cognition and Instruction，28(2)，146-180。  new window
2.Zhu, Y.、Fan, L. H.(2006)。Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education，4(4)，609-626。  new window
3.Tarr, J. E.、Reys, R. E.、Reys, B. J.、Chávez, Ó.、Shih, J.、Osterlind, S. J.(2008)。The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，39(3)，247-280。  new window
4.Yang, D. C.、Wu, W. R.(2010)。The study of number sense realistic activities integrated into third-grade math classes in Taiwan。The Journal of Educational Research，103(6)，379-392。  new window
5.Cai, J.(1995)。A cognitive analysis of US students' mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education。  new window
6.張守波(2011)。新加坡中學數學教材的特色與啟示。外國中小學教育，4，31-35。  延伸查詢new window
7.張奠宙(20070000)。中華文化對今日數學教育之影響。基礎教育學報，16(1)，45-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊龍立(19941200)。科學教育理念之影響因素的探討。初等教育學刊，3，315-331。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cai, J.、Moyer, J. C.、Wang, N.、Hwang, S.、Nie, B.、Garber, T.(2013)。Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students' learning。Educational Studies in Mathematics，83(1)，57-69。  new window
10.Cai, J.、Wang, N.、Moyer, J. C.、Nie, B.(2011)。Longitudinal investigation of the curriculum effect: An analysis of student learning outcomes from the LieCal project in United States。International Journal of Educational Research，50(2)，117-136。  new window
11.Cain, J. S.(2002)。An evaluation of the connected mathematics project。The Journal of Educational Research，95(4)，224-233。  new window
12.Cifarelli, Victor V.、Cai, Jinfa(2005)。The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem-solving situations。The Journal of Mathematical Behavior，24(3/4)，302-324。  new window
13.Devetak, I.、Vogrinc, J.、Glazar, S.(2010)。States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14。International Journal of Environmental and Science Education，5(2)，217-235。  new window
14.Fan, L.、Zhu, F.、Miao, Z.(2013)。Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions。ZDM Mathematics Education，45(5)，633-646。  new window
15.Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A.(2007)。From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the "Voice" of a mathematics textbook。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，38(4)，344-369。  new window
16.Hong, D. S.、Choi, K. M.(2014)。A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: The case of quadratic equations。Educational Studies in Mathematics，85(2)，241-263。  new window
17.Leung, F. K. S.(2001)。In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education。Educational Studies in Mathematics，47(1)，35-51。  new window
18.Li, Y.(2000)。A comparison problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，31(2)，234-241。  new window
19.Marascuilo, L. A.(1966)。Large-sample multiple comparisons。Psychological Bulletin，65(5)，280-290。  new window
20.Reys, B. J.、Reys, R. E.、Chávez, O.(2004)。Why mathematics textbooks matter。Educational Leadership，61(5)，61-66。  new window
21.Tarr, J. E.、Reys, B. J.、Barker, D. D.、Billstein, R.(2006)。Selecting high quality mathematic textbooks。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School，12(1)，50-54。  new window
22.Yang, D. C.、Reys, R. E.、Wu, L. L.(2010)。Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth-and-sixth grades’ textbook of Singapore, Taiwan, and the U.S.A.。School Science and Mathematics，110(3)，118-127。  new window
23.吳德邦、馬秀蘭、藍同利(20060300)。小青的三角形概念--從Duval理論的觀點探究一位國小五年級視覺型兒童之個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，42，78-116。  延伸查詢new window
24.徐偉民、林美如(20091200)。臺灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報，16，47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Brenner, M. E.、Herman, S.、Ho, H. Z.、Zimmer, J. M.(1999)。Cross-national comparison of representational competence。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，30(5)，541-547。  new window
26.Charalambous, C. Y.、Delaney, S.、Hsu, H. Y.、Mesa, V.(2010)。A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries。Mathematical Thinking and Learning，12(2)，117-151。  new window
27.左台益、梁勇能(20011000)。國二學生空間能力與van Hiele幾何思考層次相關性研究。師大學報．科學教育類，46(1/2)，1-20。  延伸查詢new window
28.Huang, R.、Cai, J.(2011)。Pedagogical representations to teach linear relations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms: Parallel or hierarchical?。The Journal of Mathematical Behavior，30(2)，149-165。  new window
29.Fan, L.、Zhu, Y.(2007)。Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks。Educational Studies in Mathematics，66(1)，61-75。  new window
30.Burger, W. F.、Shaughnessy, J. M.(1986)。Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，17(1)，31-48。  new window
31.陳仁輝、楊德清(20100200)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊，18(1)，43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.楊德清、陳仁輝(20110200)。臺灣、美國和新加坡三個七年級代數教科書發展學生數學能力方式之研究。科學教育學刊，19(1)，39-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Cai, J.(2001)。Improving Mathematics Learning: Lessons from Cross-national Studies of U.S. and Chinese Students。Phi Delta Kappan，82(5)，400-405。  new window
34.Stigler, J. W.、Hiebert, J.(2004)。Improving mathematics teaching。Educational Leadership，61(5)，12-17。  new window
會議論文
1.Michael, N.(200210)。Inside the PISA: Comparing two high achieving countries from the west (Finland) and from the east (Japan)。ICMI Comparative Study Conference 2002。Hong Kong。  new window
2.Zhu, Y.、Fan, L.(200407)。An analysis of the representation of problem types in Chinese and US mathematics textbooks。Copenhagen, Denmark。  new window
學位論文
1.謝佩珍(2009)。台灣與中國國中數學教科書之內容分析研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Skemp, R. R.(1987)。The Psychology of Learning Mathematics。Harmondsworth, UK：Penguin。  new window
2.Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A.、Wagner, D.(2005)。In the middle of nowhere: How a textbook can position the mathematics learner。  new window
3.Lappan, G.、Fey, J. T.、Fitzgerald, W. M.、Friel, S. N.、Phillips, E. D.(2006)。Connected mathematics: Looking for Pythagoras。Boston, MA：Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Lappan, G.、Fey, J. T.、Fitzgerald, W. M.、Friel, S. N.、Phillips, E. D.(2006)。Connected mathematics: Covering and surrounding。Boston, MA：Prentice Hall。  new window
5.Lappan, G.、Fey, J. T.、Fitzgerald, W. M.、Friel, S. N.(2006)。Connected mathematics: Shapes and designs。Boston, MA：Prentice Hall。  new window
6.Rivette, K.、Grant, Y.、Ludema, H.、Rickard, A.(2003)。Connected mathematics project: Research and evaluation summary。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Teh, K. S.、Loh, C. Y.(2007)。New syllabus mathematics。Singapore City：Shinglee。  new window
8.Teh, K. S.、Loh, C. Y.(2008)。New syllabus mathematics。Singapore City：Shinglee。  new window
9.Hiebert, J.、Gallimore, R.、Garnier, H.、Givvin, K. B.、Hollingsworth, H.、Jacobs, J.、Chiu, A. M. Y.、Wearne, D.、Smith, M.、Kersting, N.、Manaster, A.、Tseng, E.、Etterbeek, W.、Manaster, C.、Gonzales, P.、Stigler, J.(2003)。Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study。Washington, DC：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
10.黃光雄、簡茂發(1993)。教育研究法。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
11.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Foy, P.、Arora, A.、Stanco, G. M.(2012)。TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics。Chestnut Hill, MA：TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
12.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
13.van Hiele, Pierre M.(1986)。Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education。Academic Press。  new window
14.陳宜良、單維彰、洪萬生、袁媛(2005)。中小學數學科課程綱要評估與發展研究。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Ginsburg, A.，Leinwand, S.，Anstrom, T.，Pollock, E.(2005)。What the United States can learn from Singapore’s world-class mathematics system (and what Singapore can learn from the United States): An exploratory study(ED491632)。  new window
其他
1.廖雅玉(20100302)。「小四課本反光」康軒教材爆爭議，http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/84254。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2009)。Connected mathematics project，http://connectedmath.msu.edu/。  new window
3.Hall, P. P.(2009)。Guiding principle: Student learning: Rationale for a problem centered curriculum，http://connectedmath.msu.edu/。  new window
4.Kim, O. K.(2007)。Teacher knowledge and curriculum use，http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/9/4/6/5/pages194653/p194653-1.php。  new window
5.Ministry of Education in Singapore。Secondary education，http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary。  new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2010)。PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world，http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/39725224.pdf。  new window
7.Show-Me Center(2002)。CMP implementation map，http://www.math.msu.edu/cmp/Overview/ImplementationMap.htm。  new window
8.(2009)。New syllabus math for 7th grade/secondary 1 package: Product benefits，http://www.sgbox.com/s1nsm.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.、Smith, M. S.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Information Age。  new window
2.Jones, K.(2010)。Linking geometry and algebra in the school mathematics curriculum。Future curricular trends in school algebra and geometry: Proceedings of a conference。Charlotte, NC：Information Age。  new window
3.Leung, F. K. S.(2006)。Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter?。Mathematics education in different cultural traditions —A comparative study of east asia and the west。New York, NY：Springer。  new window
4.Park, K.、Leung, F. K. S.(2006)。A comparative study of the mathematics textbooks of China, England, Japan, Korea, and the United States。Mathematics education in different cultural traditions--A comparative study of East Asia and the West: The 13th ICMI study。New York, NY：Springer。  new window
5.Duval, R.(1995)。Geometrical pictures: Kinds of representation and specific processing。Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education。New York, NY：Berlin：Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg。  new window
6.Clements, D. H.、Battista, M. T.(1992)。Geometry and spatial reasoning。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Macmillan publishing Company。  new window
7.Biggs, J. B.(1996)。Western Misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage Learning Culture。The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences。Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong。  new window
8.Treffers, A.(1991)。Realistic mathematics education in the Netherlands 1980-1990。Realistic mathematics education in primary school。Utrecht：CD-b Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1393（臺灣：1379，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67637744
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上