:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用PISA科學素養評量架構探討國中生物教科書中問題的特徵
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:仰威融林淑梤 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Wei-rongLin, Shu-fen
出版日期:2020
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁75-106
主題關鍵詞:內容分析科學素養教科書問題PISAContent analysisScientific literacyTextbook questions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.黃靖惠、洪志誠、許瑛玿(20121200)。九年一貫教科書「全球暖化概念」內容分析。教科書研究,5(3),27-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lin, C. Y.、Cheng, J. H.、Chang, W. H.(2010)。Making science vivid: Using a historical episodes map。International Journal of Science Education,32(18),2521-2531。  new window
3.呂紹海、巫俊明(20081200)。國小「自然與生活科技」教科書中科學史內容之分析。新竹教育大學教育學報,25(2),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉昭宏、郭重吉(19950200)。教科書在國中理化教學中的應用之個案研究。科學教育,6,89-112。  延伸查詢new window
5.周珮儀、鄭明長(20080100)。教科書研究方法論之探究。課程與教學,11(1),193-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊德清、鄭婷芸(20150300)。臺灣、美國與新加坡國中階段幾何教材內容之分析比較。教育科學研究期刊,60(1),33-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃茂在、吳敏而(20160800)。探索十二年國教自然科學教科書的設計原則--以「熱傳播」單元為例。教科書研究,9(2),69-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.唐淑華(20170800)。培養閱讀素養,何必遠求?從設計--本「以學生為主體」的中學課本開始。教科書研究,10(2),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Smith, B. L.、Holliday, W. G.、Austin, H. W.(2010)。Students' comprehension of science textbooks using a question-based reading strategy。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(4),363-379。  new window
10.范信賢、秦葆琦、蔡清田、鄭章華、鄭圓鈴、周珮儀、林慶隆(20151200)。十二年國民基本教育教材。教科書研究,8(3),155-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳麗華(20081200)。評介「為學習而設計的教科書」及其對我國中小學教科書設計與研究的啟示。教科書研究,1(2),137-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李明玲、溫媺純(20170900)。教科書中科學知識架構之內容分析--以生殖與遺傳單元為例。科學教育學刊,25(3),219-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Anagnostopoulou, K.、Hatzinikita, V.、Christidou, V.(2012)。PISA and biology school textbooks: The role of visual material。Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,46,1839-1845。  new window
14.Bazzul, J.(2015)。Tracing "ethical subjectivities" in science education: How biology textbooks can frame ethico-political choices for students。Research in Science Education,45(1),23-40。  new window
15.Calado, F. M.、Scharfenberg, F. J.、Bogner, F. X.(2015)。To what extent do biology textbooks contribute to scientific literacy? Criteria for analysing science-technology-society-environment issues。Education Sciences,5(4),255-280。  new window
16.Davis, O. L.、Hunkins, F. P.(1966)。Textbook questions: What thinking processes do they foster?。Peabody Journal of Education,43(5),285-292。  new window
17.Elisenman, H. B.、Wagner, D.(2007)。A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner。For the Learning of Mathematics,27(2),8-14。  new window
18.Davila, K.、Talanquet, V.(2010)。Classifying end-of-chapter questions and problems for selected general chemistry textbooks used in the United States。Journal of Chemical Education,87(1),97-102。  new window
19.Ge, Y.-P.、Unsworth, L.、Wang, K.-H.、Chang, H.-P.(2018)。What images reveal: A comparative study of science images between Australian and Taiwanese junior high school textbooks。Research in Science Education,48(6),1409-1431。  new window
20.Lemoni, R.、Stamou, A. G.、Stamou, G. P.(2011)。"Romantic", "classic" and "baroque" views of nature: An analysis of pictures about the environment in Greek primary school textbooks: Diachronic considerations。Research in Science Education,41(5),811-832。  new window
21.Lustick, D.(2010)。The priority of the question: Focus questions for sustained reasoning in science。Journal of Science Teacher Education,21(5),495-511。  new window
22.McDonald, C. V.(2016)。Evaluating junior secondary science textbook usage in Australian schools。Research in Science Education,46(4),481-509。  new window
23.Mishra, R. K.(2015)。Mapping the knowledge topography: A critical appraisal of geography textbook questions。International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,24(2),118-130。  new window
24.Perin, D.(2011)。Facilitating student learning through contextualization: A review of evidence。Community College Review,39(3),268-295。  new window
25.Skoog, G.(2005)。The coverage of human evolution in high school biology textbooks in the 20th century and in current state science standards。Science & Education,14,395-422。  new window
26.林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林(20081200)。科學實習教師個人實務理論實踐之探究。師大學報.科學教育類,53(2),1-29。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃郁雯(2005)。情境式問題導向融入教學對國小六年級學童科學概念及科學態度之影響(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳建立(2010)。國中生物教科書因果類複句分析與學生閱讀理解之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.許美香(2019)。八年級學生對生物教科書插圖之讀圖理解研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bransford, J. D.、Brown, A. L.、Cocking, R. R.(2000)。How people learn。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
2.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。National Academy Press。  new window
3.Wiggins, G.、McTighe, J.、賴麗珍(2016)。重理解的課程設計。心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.林煥祥、佘曉清(2017)。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013)。Science framework,http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.van Akker, D. J.(1998)。The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes。International Handbook of Science Education。Great Britain:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Roberts, M.(1996)。Teaching styles and strategies。Geography education: Viewpoints on teaching and learning。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE