緒論：本研究延續國內聶喬齡（2000）「流暢狀態量表」之研究，依據Csikszentmihalyi（1975,1990）的流暢理論為基礎架構，從質性到量化之途徑發展適合測量本國高中運動選手之流暢狀態量表。方法：共分為四個階段嚴謹之步驟，第一階段先以紮根理論訪談12位高中運動選手，再以Jackson與Marsh（1996）的流暢狀態量表（FSS）的題項為基礎，結合國內選手中文化的題目語意，用以建構流暢狀態表述的主要概念與詞語，作為流暢狀態量表之構面與題庫，次以問卷調查進行量表編製，施測程序共分三次進行，有效樣本總計1,639份，各階段之樣本分別為388位、397位與854位高中之運動選手。第二階段為編製題項、項目分析、探索性因素分析、內部一致性等程序；第三階段為驗證性因素分析，並且進行收斂效度、平均變異數抽取量、區別效度、組合信度與效標關聯分析等之檢定；第四階段則為測量的恆等性檢定。結果：顯示量表包含「知覺平衡與控制感」、「專注訊息與回饋」、「喪失自我意識」、「時間感改變」與「自成性經驗」等五個構面18個題項，從各項指標顯示，量表具有良好之信、效度且具有測量之恆等性。結論：本量表適用於高中運動選手流暢狀態之檢測，透過量表可測量選手經歷比賽時流暢狀態的反應。

Introduction: This study extended Taiwan scholar Nien's (2000) Flow State Scale. In accordance with the foundation of flow theory by Csikszentmihalyi (1975, 1990), we developed appropriate flow state scale for Taiwanese high school athletes from qualitative analysis to quantization. Method: There were four discreet steps. The first step was to interview twelve high school athletes using Grounded Theory. This study adopted the Flow State Scale proposed by Jackson and Marsh (1996) as a foundation and then combined the Chinese version items of Taiwan athletes to construct the main concepts and phrases as the dimensions and items of Flow State Scale. Continually, we developed scales by questionnaire survey. The survey procedure was divided into three stages. A total of 1639 valid responses from high school athletes, 388 from the first stage, 397 from the second stage and 854 from the third stage respectively. Then, the second step was item development, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency. The third step was to proceed to confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, average variance extracted amount, discriminant validity, composite reliability, and criterion related analysis. The fourth step was to examine measurement invariance. Result: The results showed that the scale included five aspects and eighteen items; they are perceptional balance and sense of control, focused message and feedback, loss self-consciousness, the transformation of time, and autotelic experience. All indicators presented good reliability, validity, and measurement invariance. Conclusion: The result showed that this scale is suitable for testing the flow state of high school athletes. This scale can be provided for realizing the athlete flow state responses of experiencing contest.