:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:遊憩者-遊憩環境契合度、情境涉入與心流之關係
書刊名:體育學報
作者:曹勝雄 引用關係古璧慎 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsaur, Sheng-hshiungKu, Pi-shen
出版日期:2015
卷期:48:2
頁次:頁205-219
主題關鍵詞:遊憩者-遊憩環境契合度要求-能力契合需要-供給契合情境涉入心流Recreationist-environment fitRequirements-abilities fitNeeds-supplies fitSituational involvementFlow
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:515
  • 點閱點閱:100
緒論:過去研究遊憩者與環境互動的文獻多聚焦於,遊憩者自遊憩環境所獲得的遊憩利益與遊憩體驗。然而卻忽略了有時遊憩環境的特性是需要遊憩者具備特定的遊憩能力才能有效地發揮其功用。因此本研究採用遊憩者-遊憩環境契合度 (要求-能力契合、需要-供給契合)的概念,檢視其與情境涉入、心流之間的關係。同時,本研究亦進一步驗證情境涉入在要求-能力契合、需要-供給契合與心流體驗個別關係中的中介效果。方法:本研究以台北陽明山國家公園步道與高雄壽山國家自然公園的健行者為調查對象,共蒐集有效問卷共443份,採用結構方程模式進行假設檢定。結果:(一)要求-能力契合與需要-供給契合皆會正向影響遊憩者的情境涉入與心流體驗。(二)情境涉入同樣會正向地影響遊憩者的心流體驗。(三)在要求-能力契合、需要-供給契合與心流體驗的個別關係中,情境涉入皆扮演著中介的角色。結論:(一)遊憩者與遊憩環境間的契合度有助於遊憩者產生情境涉入與心流體驗。意即當遊憩者的能力足以應付環境挑戰的需要時,或是環境提供了紓解壓力、聯絡感情等自己所需求的體驗或效益,遊憩者可從中獲得樂趣,進而在活動過程中產生短暫的涉入,同時也會體驗到心流。(二)情境涉入可提升遊憩者的心流體驗。此意涵著短暫涉入的健行者會體驗到愉悅與享受等正向情緒,使他們專注在活動當中,而忘記時間的流逝。(三)要求-能力契合與需要-供給契合會透過情境涉入的中介而間接地影響遊憩者的心流體驗。意即與環境達到需要-供給或要求-能力契合的遊憩者會更加投入活動,享受活動的進行,因而促使心流體驗的產生。
Purpose: Previous recreationists-environment interaction studies more focused on how recreationist gets recreation benefit and recreation experience from environment. However, past researches ignored the recreational environment characteristics require recreationist's specific ability to perform its function effectively. Therefore, this study adopted the concept of recreationist-environment fit (requirements-abilities fit, needs-supplies fit) and test the relationships among recreationist-environment fit, situational involvement, and flow experience. At the same time, this study also investigates the mediating effect of situational involvement on the relationship between requirements-abilities fit/needs-supplies fit and flow. Methods: A total of 443 usable structured questionnaires were collected from hikers of Yangmingshan National Park in Taipei City, and Shoushan National Nature Park in Kaohsiung City. Data was analyzed by structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: (1) Recreation participants have greater requirements-abilities fit and needs-supplies fit significantly leads to a higher level of situational involvement and flow experience. (2) Recreation participants showed greater situational involvement that also significantly leads to a higher level of flow experience. (3) Situational involvement mediated the effects of requirements-abilities fit and needs-supplies fit on flow experience. Conclusion: (1) The fit between recreationists and their environment can facilitate recreationists' situational involvement and flow experience. When the recreationists' abilities are in accord with the environment's requirements, or the recreation benefits of recreationists are satisfied by the instrumental and expressive attributes of a recreation setting. Recreationists more likely to enjoy the hiking activity and experience pleasure from it, and they temporary feel involvement and experience flow. (2) Situational involvement can enhance recreationists' flow experience. This result means that recreationists experience positive emotions such as pleasure and enjoyment, so that they fully immersed in hiking activity and loss the sense of time. (3) Requirements-abilities fit and needs-supplies fit indirectly affect recreationists' flow experience through the mediation of situational involvement. The result shows that fit between recreationists and environment will motive recreationists more likely to involve the hiking activity, and enjoy it, and they experience flow.
期刊論文
1.曹勝雄、林濰榕(20121200)。遊憩者--遊憩環境契合度之前因與後果:以玉山登山者為例。戶外遊憩研究,25(4),79-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭天明、曹勝雄、陳美存。認眞性休閒與心流體驗之關係:情境涉入的中介與調節角色。戶外遊憩研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Im, H.、Ha, Y.(2011)。The effect of perceptual fluency and enduring involvement on situational involvement in an online apparel shopping context。Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,15(3),345-362。  new window
4.Munson, M. J.、McQuarrie, E. F.(1987)。The factorial and predictive validities of a revised measure of Zaichkowsky's personal involvement inventory。Educational and Psychological Measurement,47(3),773-782。  new window
5.Neo, F. P.、Uysal, M.(1997)。Evaluation of outdoor recreational settings: A problem of measuring user satisfaction。Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,4(4),223-230。  new window
6.Stenseng, F.、Rise, J.、Kraft, P.(2012)。Activity Engagement as Escape from Self: The Role of Self-Suppression and Self-Expansion。Leisure Sciences,34(1),19-38。  new window
7.Tsaur, S. H.、Liang, Y. W.、Lin, W. R.(2012)。Conceptualization and Measurement of Recreationist-Environment fit。Journal of Leisure Research,44(1),110-130。  new window
8.Wöran, B.、Arnberger, A.(2012)。Exploring relationships between recreation specialization, restorative environments and mountain hikers' flow experience。Leisure Sciences,34(2),95-114。  new window
9.Wu, Tsung-Chiung (Emily)、Scott, David、Yang, Chun-Chieh(2013)。Advanced or addicted? Exploring the relationship of recreation specialization to flow experiences and online game addiction。Leisure Sciences,35(3),203-217。  new window
10.Coble, Theresa G.、Selin, Steve W.、Erickson, Beth B.(2003)。Hiking alone: Understanding fear, negotiation strategies and leisure experience。Journal of Leisure Research,35(1),1-22。  new window
11.Decloe, M. D.、Kaczynski, A. T.、Havitz, M. E.(2009)。Social participation, flow and situational involvement in recreational physical activity。Journal of Leisure Research,41(1),73-91。  new window
12.Dimanche, F.、Samdahl, D.(1994)。Leisure as symbolic consumption: A conceptualization and prospectus for future research。Leisure Sciences,16(1),119-129。  new window
13.Iwasaki, Yoshi、Mannell, Roger C.(1999)。Situational and Personality Influences on Intrinsically Motivated Leisure Behavior: Interaction Effects and Cognitive Processes。Leisure Sciences,21(4),287-306。  new window
14.Kaplan, S.(1983)。A model of person-environment compatibility。Environment and Behavior,15(3),311-332。  new window
15.Lee, B.、Shafer, C. S.(2002)。The dynamic nature of leisure experience: An application of affect control theory。Journal of Leisure Research,34(3),290-310。  new window
16.Lee, J.、Graefe, A. R.、Burns, R. C.(2007)。Examining the antecedents of destination loyalty in a forest setting。Leisure Sciences,29(5),463-481。  new window
17.Russell, W. D.(2001)。An examination of flow state occurrence in college athletes。Journal of Sport Behavior,24(1),83-107。  new window
18.Wheeler, A. R.、Buckley, M. R.、Halbesleben, J. R.、Brouer, R. L .、Ferris, G. R.(2005)。''The elusive criterion of fit'' revisited: Toward an integrative theory of multidimensional fit。Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,24,265-304。  new window
19.Wu, C. H.-J.、Liang, R.-D.(2011)。The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: A flow theory perspective。Tourism Management,32(2),317-325。  new window
20.Kaplan, R.(2001)。The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits。Environment and Behavior,33(4),507-542。  new window
21.Havitz, Mark E.、Dimanche, Frederic(1997)。Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances。Journal of Leisure Research,29(3),245-278。  new window
22.Vitterso, J.、Vorkinn, M.、Vistad, O. I.(2001)。Congruence between recreational mode and actual behaviore--A prerequisite for optimal experience?。Journal of Leisure Research,33(2),137-159。  new window
23.Jackson, S. A.(1995)。Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes。Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,7(2),138-166。  new window
24.Bryan, Hobson(1977)。Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen。Journal of Leisure Research,9(3),174-187。  new window
25.Lee, B. K.、Shafer, C. S.、Kang, I.(2005)。Examining relationships among perceptions of self, episode-specific evaluations, and overall satisfaction with a leisure activity。Leisure Sciences,27(2),93-109。  new window
26.Kim, S. S.、Scott, D.、Crompton, J. L.(1997)。An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of bird watching。Journal of Leisure Research,29(3),320-341。  new window
27.Preacher, Kristopher J.、Hayes, Andrew F.(2004)。SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models。Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36(4),717-731。  new window
28.Havitz, Mark E.、Mannell, Roger C.(2005)。Enduring Involvement, Situational Involvement, and Flow in Leisure and Non-leisure Activities。Journal of Leisure Research,37(2),152-177。  new window
29.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。  new window
30.Laurent, Gilles、Kapferer, Jean-Noël(1985)。Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles。Journal of Marketing Research,22(1),41-53。  new window
31.Podsakoff, Philip M.、Organ, Dennis W.(1986)。Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects。Journal of Management,12(4),531-544。  new window
32.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(20060200)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Richins, Marsha L.、Bloch, P. H.、McQuarrie, E. F.(1992)。How enduring and situational involvement combine to create involvement responses。Journal of Consumer Psychology,1(2),143-153。  new window
會議論文
1.Priest, S.(1994)。The how and why of risk taking。the meeting of fifth North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management。Fort Collins, CO.。  new window
圖書
1.Driver, Beverly L.、Brown, Perry J.、Peterson, George L.(1991)。Benefits of Leisure。Venture Publishing, Inc.。  new window
2.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.(1998)。Multivariate data analysis。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
3.Csíkszentmihályi, Mihály(2000)。Beyond boredom and anxiety。Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1993)。LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language。Scientific Software International。  new window
其他
1.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1992)。Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY:。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nakamura, Jeanne、Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi(2005)。The concept of flow。Handbook of positive psychology。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Houston, Michael J.、Rothschild, Michael L.(1978)。Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement。Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions。American Marketing Association。  new window
3.Nakamura, Jeanne、Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi(2002)。The concept of flow。Handbook of positive psychology。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為:領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係:以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
5. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
6. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
7. 家庭支持與阻礙協商對身心障礙照顧者持續性休閒涉入之影響分析
8. 居服員留任傾向之研究
9. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
10. 病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響:壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式
11. 重度工作投資與工作倦怠:健康促進與心理資本扮演之調節角色
12. 就事論事或將心比心?顧客不當對待與員工身心壓力的情緒歷程:壓力源評估與同理心特質的調節效果
13. 越南臺商外派人員之領導部屬交換對職場偏差行為之影響--以外在工作價值與工作不安全感為調節變項
14. 學校運動教練工作不安全感、組織認同、工作倦怠與工作退縮行為:工作要求-資源模式之觀點
15. 景觀餐廳顧客認知價值對行為意圖與額外願付價格之影響
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE