:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:癌末病情告知的倫理兩難
書刊名:生命教育研究
作者:黃柏青
作者(外文):Huang, Po-ching
出版日期:2015
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁47-62
主題關鍵詞:癌症末期病情告知倫理分析經權原則Terminal cancerTell the truthEthical analysisPrinciple of flexibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:155
獲悉癌末病情往往對病患與家庭帶來突然且巨大的衝擊,倘若家屬擔心病患承受不了打擊而要求隱瞞病情,那麼「是否告知癌末病患實情」將是醫師最先遭遇到的兩難問題。本研究首先就個人、家庭及法律三方面的觀點探討癌末病情告知的倫理與法律議題,並指出其中的爭議所在與可能面臨的道德衝突。對於道德兩難所產生的問題,倫理分析提供道德理據支持或反對一個判斷或行動,以達成解決問題的目的而又可減輕負面效果。本文引用Beauchamp與Childress(2009)兩位學者依據多年的實踐經驗所提出的一套決策方法,藉以有效地處理爭議所產生的困難。另一方面,儒家的「經權原則」也可提供醫師一個思考與判斷的方向,指引面臨道德兩難者做出符合道德本義要求的抉擇,而對病患的「真誠關懷」及「同理心」是能否真正貫徹經權原則的關鍵所在。
Terminal cancers usually have a great impact on the patients and their family members. We should concern for the biological, psychological, social and spiritual needs in the care for terminal cancer patients. Truth telling will be the first encountered ethical dilemma. This article investigates the ethical and legal issues in disclosing bad news from individual, familial and legal perspectives. The moral conflict between "principle of respect for autonomy" and "principle of non-malefi cence" is also pointed out at the same time. An ethical analysis provides us a basis to solve moral conflicts and lower negative effects. This article introduces a framework which was proposed by Beauchamp and Childress (2009) to balance ethical principles and manage ethical dilemmas. In addition, "principle of flexibility" of Confucianism also provides us a method for judgment, and empathy is the key point to practice the principle of fl exibility. Developing the guidelines of disclosing bad news in clinics may be helpful for improving the quality of terminal care in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Gillon, R.(1985)。Autonomy and the principle of respect for autonomy。British Medical Journal,290(6484),1806-1808。  new window
2.Kübler-Ross, E.、Wessler, S.、Avioli, L. V.(1972)。On death and dying。JAMA,221(2),174-179。  new window
3.Misono, S.、Weiss, N. S.、Fann, J. R.、Redman, M.、Yueh, B.(2008)。Incidence of suicide in persons with cancer。Journal of Clinical Oncology,26(29),4731-4738。  new window
4.Sheu, S. J.、Huang, S. H.、Tang, F. I.、Huang, S. L.(2006)。Ethical decision-making on terminal cancer truth telling: The medical students' choice between patient autonomy and family paternalism。Medical Education,40(6),590-598。  new window
5.Tang, W. R.、Fang, J. T.、Fang, C. K.、Fujimori, M.(2013)。Truth telling in medical practice: Students' opinions versus their observations of attending physicians, clinical practice。Psycho-Oncology,22(7),1605-1610。  new window
6.Benson, J.、Britten, N.(1996)。Respecting the autonomy of cancer patients when talking with their families: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with patients。British Medical Journal,313(7059),729-731。  new window
7.Lin, C. C.(1999)。Disclosure of the cancer diagnosis as it relates to the quality of pain management among patients with cancer pain in Taiwan。Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,18(5),331-337。  new window
8.Chiu, T. Y.、Hu, W. Y.、Huang, H. L.、Yao, C. A.、Chen, C. Y.(2009)。Prevailing ethical dilemmas in terminal care for patients with cancer in Taiwan。Journal of Clinical Oncology,27(24),3964-3968。  new window
9.楊秀儀(20020100)。溫暖的父權vs.空虛的自主--到底法律要建立什麼樣的醫病關係?。應用倫理研究通訊,21,19-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡甫昌(20000600)。生命倫理四原則方法。醫學教育,4(2),12-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡甫昌、李明濱(20021200)。當代生命倫理學。醫學教育,6(4),381-395。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李瑞全(2013)。儒家道德規範根源論。新北市:鵝湖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lo, Bernard(2009)。Resolving ethical dilemmas: A guide for clinicians。Lippincott Williams & Wilkins。  new window
3.Engelhardt, H. T. Jr.(1996)。The Foundations of Bioethics。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.李瑞全(1999)。儒家生命倫理學。臺北:鵝湖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Singer, Peter A.、蔡甫昌(2009)。臨床生命倫理學。臺北:財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Beauchamp, Tom L.、Childress, James F.(2009)。Principles of Biomedical Ethics。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE