:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:三軍聯訓基地周邊民眾「鄰避情節」與軍民關係之研究
書刊名:復興崗學報
作者:鐘國應
作者(外文):Chung, Kao-ying
出版日期:2016
卷期:109
頁次:頁31-54
主題關鍵詞:鄰避情節三軍聯訓基地睦鄰工作軍民關係NIMBYJOTBCommunity relationsCivilian-military relations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:150
  • 點閱點閱:30
國軍透過睦鄰工作,爭取百姓支持,藉以提升軍民間友好的關係。長年來卻時有耳聞,因訓練、演習擾民,導致訓練基(場)地周邊民眾發生類似「鄰避情節」(Never In My Back Yard,NIMBY)。然而,國軍對於「鄰避」問題的研究顯得格外不足。基此,本研究以三軍聯訓基地為例,透過文獻探討及深入訪談相關人員,試圖瞭解睦鄰工作對國軍與營區周邊民眾間的軍民關係影響情形。研究結果發現聯訓基地周邊百姓多表達瞭解國防的重要性,並且支持國防,惟常受到射擊或訓練任務影響,而產生了「鄰避情節」;然而一般民眾與民意代表的訴求方式及內容,卻有所不同。經由本研究的成果,呼籲除了應發展國軍鄰避量表,詳實分析民眾認知,並區分目標對象,以先期掌握特定訴求,更需適時提升處理層級,並落實縱向研究及長期追蹤,以及重新檢視工作要點,調整敦親睦鄰工作政策。
It is through community-relations work that the ROC armed forces win the hearts of civilians, thereby improving the civilian-military relationship. For a long time, there have been cases of civilian upset due to military training and exercise, which is usuallycalled "Never in My Back Yard" (NIMBY). However, the current available research on the issues of NIMBY is extremely inadequate. As a result, this study takes the Joint Operations Training Base (JOTB) in Pintung as an example, and tries to evaluate the impact of the ROC community-relations work on the relationship between the base and the civilians living nearby from 2014 through 2016 through literature review and in-depth interviews with relevant cases. The results show that people around the base do understand the importance of national defense and support defense activities, but they were often disturbed by artillery fire or other training tasks, resulting in NIMBY problems. There are differences between responses from the general public and political representatives. In accordance with the results of this study, we call for the development of the NIMBY Scale, detailed analysis of public awareness, and distinguish the target audience to grasp the specific aspirations, combined with more follow-up attention to NIMBY issues through longitudinal research for refining our community-relations policies in time.
期刊論文
1.廖坤榮、陳雅芬(20050200)。地方民主與永續發展--濱南案政策過程探討。空大行政學報,15,35-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丘昌泰、蘇瑞祥(19990800)。破解選票政治、回饋情結與公共政策的三角難題:以環保政策為觀察焦點。法商學報,35,147-185。  延伸查詢new window
3.李永展、何紀芳(19991200)。環境正義與鄰避設施選址之探討。規劃學報,26,91-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.曾明遜(19951000)。鄰避設施管理策略。現代地政,15(10)=172,25-27。  延伸查詢new window
5.丘昌泰(19980800)。公害社區風險溝通之問題與對策。法商學報,34,17-58。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭代基(19960700)。汙染性設施之設置與民眾信心之建立。臺灣經濟預測與政策,27(1),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪鴻智(20050300)。科技鄰避設施風險知覺之形成與投影:核二廠。人文及社會科學集刊,17(1),33-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪鴻智(20021200)。科技風險知覺與風險消費態度的決定--灰色訊息關聯分析之應用。都市與計劃,29(4),575-593。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Meernik, James(1996)。United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy。Journal of Peace Research,33(4),391-402。  new window
10.湯京平(19990600)。鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略--以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六輕建廠及拜耳投資案。政治科學論叢,10,355-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉子利(20021200)。衝突理論在學校社區化之運用。教育資料集刊,27,35-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Shamdasani, P. N.、Stanaland, A. J. S.、Tan, J.(2001)。Location, Location, Location: Insights for Advertising Placement on the Web。Journal of Advertising Research,41(4),7-21。  new window
13.Dear, Michael(1992)。Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome。Journal of the American Planning Association,58(3),288-300。  new window
14.丘昌泰(20021200)。從「鄰避情結」到「迎臂效應」--臺灣環保抗爭的問題與出路。政治科學論叢,17,33-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李永展(19981200)。鄰避設施衝突管理之研究。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,9,33-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李永展、何紀芳(19960900)。臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果。都市與計劃,23(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Twight, Charlotte(1989)。Institutional Underpinnings of Parochialism: The Case of Military Base Closures。Cato Journal,9,73-105。  new window
18.Groothuis, P. A.、Miller, G.(1994)。Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities: The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs。American Journal of Economics and Sociology,53(3),335-346。  new window
19.Lake, R. W.(1993)。Rethinking NIMBY。American Planning Association Journal,159,87-93。  new window
20.Yara, Tomohiro(2012)。Exploring Solutions to the U.S. Military-Base Issues in Okinawa。Eurasia Border Review,3(2),119-131。  new window
21.Popper, Frank(1992)。The Great LULU Trading Game。Planning,58,15-17。  new window
22.Mayer, R. Kenneth(1995)。Closing Military Base(Finally): Solving Collective Dilemmas Through Delegation。Legislative Studies Quarterly,20,393-413。  new window
23.Halfacre, C. Angela、Matheny, Albert R.、Rosenbaum, Walter A.(2000)。Regulating Contested Local Hazards: Is Constructive Dialogue Possible Among Participations in Community Risk Management?。Policy Studies Journal,28,646-667。  new window
24.Brancati, Dawn(2014)。The determinants of US public opinion towards democracy promotion。Political Behavior,36,705-730。  new window
25.李永展(19970300)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃,24(1),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.李永展(19960500)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響--以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學學報,72(下),263-297。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.宋星瑤(2011)。具敏感性質設施鄰避效應影響因素研究與探討--以軍事設施為例(碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.丘昌泰(1995)。台灣環境管制政策。台北:淑馨出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡文輝(1989)。社會學理論。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.林育珊(2008)。Top研究的必修課--學術基礎研究理論。臺北:深思。  延伸查詢new window
4.李咸亨(1997)。臺北市未來殯葬設施之整體規劃。臺北:中華地理資訊協會。  延伸查詢new window
5.李永展(1997)。修訂台北市綜合發展計畫地區發展構想--文山區發展構想。臺北:臺北市政府都市發展局。  延伸查詢new window
6.李永展(1997)。台北市鄰避型公共設施更新之研究。臺北:臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂亞力(1987)。政治學方法論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.丘昌泰(2007)。鄰避情結與社區治理:臺灣環保抗爭的困局與出路。臺北:韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.重砲射擊擾漁台軍方籲修法補償,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/12/6/27/n3622070.htm%E9%87%8D%E7%A0%B2%E5%B0%84%E6%93%8A%E6%93%BE%E6%BC%81%E5%8F%B0%E8%BB%8D%E6%96%B9%E7%B1%B2%E4%BF%AE%E6%B3%95%E8%A3%9C%E5%84%9F.html。  new window
2.軍方射擊釀山林火警民批不當訓練,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/1528890。  延伸查詢new window
3.屏東聯訓基地面臨當地民怨國防部:重要性無可替代,http://udn.com/news/story/9544/1542681。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE