:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:設立兩岸水域互助協議之必要性
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:呂嘉穎
作者(外文):Lyu, Jia-ying
出版日期:2017
卷期:26:1
頁次:頁51-71
主題關鍵詞:港泰臺州號兩岸水域互助協議引水人海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議Gang Tai Tai ZhouSalvage agreement across Taiwan StraitPilotCross-strait joint fight against crime and mutual legal assistance agreement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1657
  • 點閱點閱:58
2016 年,一場颱風讓4萬6千噸的「港泰台州號」貨輪擱淺於金門海灘。然而這場意外並不僅僅造成財產上的損失,對於環境汙染、生態災難、兩岸互相協助之障礙及政治立場的不同等問題隨之揭露,另外也顯示出行政行為的怠惰與雙方不得不面對之事實。當面對的問題是跨區域或屬於多邊協作的情況時,行政主體的溝通與執行過程的分工及責任歸屬,皆為必須正視的狀況。本文透由行政法五大架構理論,針對兩岸水域互助協議之可能性,給予架構性的分析,並嘗試建立協議之模型。本文採用比較法的方式,藉由先前兩岸在司法互助上所採取之方式作原則性的探討及歸納整理。另以前述之法學方法建構,希冀能推動未來兩岸水域法制上之進程,並促進兩岸人民情感及共同利益之最大化。
The 46,000 deadweight cargo ship, Gang Tai Tai Zhou, was stranded at Kinmen beach caused by typhoon in 2016. The accident not only caused loss of property but also revealed some unavoidable problems such as administrative sloth, environmental pollution, ecological disaster, obstacles of cross-strait cooperation and the different political standpoints. With problems of cross-region and multi-cooperation, the communication between administrative institutions, the executive process and accountability of teamwork are the inevitable issues we should face. This study shall provide a structural analysis against the possibility of salvage agreement across Taiwan Strait. In addition, it shall try to build a model of agreement through the five legal frameworks of administrative law. Moreover, the comparative method is adopted in this study to make discussions and induction. With the aforementioned law methods, the purpose of this study is to promote the progressive law of cross-strait pilot industry, improve the relation between people on cross-strait and maximize the common benefits.
期刊論文
1.胡念祖(20020900)。海洋事務部之設立--理念與設計。國家政策季刊,1,53-90。  延伸查詢new window
2.許春鎮(20081200)。德國專門職業及技術人員管理法制。臺灣海洋法學報,7(2),23-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Mudric, M.(2013)。Standard Form Salvage Contracts: The Scope of the Duty to Exercise Best Endeavours。The Journal of International Maritime Law,19(3),220-236。  new window
4.柯澤東(19831200)。從一九八二年聯合國海洋法公約論船舶之航行自由。臺大法學論叢,13(1),133-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林端(19930600)。德國歷史法學派--兼論其與法律信實論、法律史和法律社會學的關係。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,22(2),39-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.江姿瑩(20040600)。二十一世紀國際海商法之立法趨勢及其統一之障礙與難題。臺灣海洋法學報,3(1),81-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.邱文彥(20160300)。海洋立法與海洋治理的挑戰。航運季刊,25(1),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.邵睿君(2013)。論國家行政機關參與的強制救助。法制博覽,1,276。  延伸查詢new window
9.張文生、李美霖(2011)。海峽兩岸在廈金海域的非傳統安全合作研究。臺灣研究集,2011(5),31-39。  延伸查詢new window
10.張雅琦(2016)。「無效果,無報酬」原則的發展變化。中國經貿,5,85-86。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳雷、王君祥(20130300)。論海峽兩岸司法互助機制--從《金門協議》到《海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪和司法互助協議》。澳門研究,2013(1)=68,149-161+198。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃裕凱(2003)。淺論政府海空難搜救費用之求償(上)--Another kind of SARS!。船舶與海運,941,1-10。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉剛仿(2011)。中國海難救助客體法律制度的梳理與完善--兼議中國海商法相關制度的修改。中國海商法年刊,22(3),43-49。  延伸查詢new window
14.樊志軍(2013)。「無效果無報酬」原則的人道和生態價值嵌入--以海難救助為背景。前沿,23,67-71。  延伸查詢new window
15.盧淑芬(2013)。淺談海難救助之客體。青年科學,7,96-97。  延伸查詢new window
16.閻鐵毅、吳煦(2012)。中國海洋執法體制研究。學術論壇,10,208-209。  延伸查詢new window
17.Bishop, A.(2012)。The development of environmental salvage and review of the London Salvage Convention 1989。Tulane Maritime Law Journal,37,34-40。  new window
18.MacKenzie, J. A.(2015)。Limitation of liability as a risk allocation mechanism in maritime law。Australian & New Zealand Maritime Law Journal,29(1),1-7。  new window
19.Mukherjee, P. K.(2012)。Maritime law and admiralty jurisdiction: historical evolution and emerging trends。The Admiral,6,1-42。  new window
20.Parent, J.(2010)。No duty to save lives, no reward for rescue: is that truly the current state of international salvage law?。Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law,12(1),136-139。  new window
21.Petrinovic, R.、Mandic, N.、Siriščević, E.(2016)。The importance of maritime law in seafarer training pursuant to amendments to the STCW convention。Transactions on Maritime Science,5(1),53-64。  new window
22.Pfund, P. H.、Taft, G.(1986)。Congress' role in the international unification of private law。Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law,16,671-686。  new window
23.Shang, H. J.、Liang, Y.(2016)。Openness and inclusiveness: nature of Chinese maritime law and legal practices。Australian & New Zealand Maritime Law Journal,30(1),107-113。  new window
24.van Hooydonk, Eric(2014)。Towards a worldwide restatement of the general principles of maritime law。Journal of International Maritime Law,20(3),170-182。  new window
25.王重陽(20090600)。從比較法觀點看「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」。展望與探索,7(6),104-116。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.姜皇池(2013)。國際公法導論。新學林出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄧學良(2016)。行政制度架構法(草案)--行政法制大綱。高雄市:中華勞資事務基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳庚(2016)。行政法之理論與實用。三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中央社(20161130)。處理港泰台州貨輪耗兩千萬金門縣赴陸求償,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20161130005456-260402。  延伸查詢new window
2.王曉易(20161118)。擱淺金門兩個月,終於成功脫淺:「港泰台州」輪拖返廈門,http://news.163.com/16/1118/08/C650IA5L00014AEE.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳伯揚,石秀華(20160921)。貨輪擱淺金門中國船主擺爛,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20160921/37390065/。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃旭磊(20161029)。立委促設立海洋部明年8月底前送審,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1870800。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉光瑩(20161019)。貨輪擱淺金門海岸,為何一個多月還無法解決,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5078901。  延伸查詢new window
6.戴世瑛(2017)。『兩岸投保協議』何時生效?--論兩岸協議簽署的生效時點,http://www.lawtw.com/article.php?template=article_content&area=free_browse&parent_path=,l,561,&job_id=192664&article_category_id=2056&article_id=112490。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE