:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:貨櫃碼頭營運作業績效評估之研究--多準則評估之應用
書刊名:國立臺灣海洋大學海運學報
作者:梁金樹丁吉峰
作者(外文):Liang, G. S.Ding, Jack J. F.
出版日期:1998
卷期:6
頁次:頁55-68
主題關鍵詞:層級程序分析法理想解與反理想解多準則決策作業績效指標AHPEntropyIdeal and anti-ideal solutionsMultiple criteria decision makingOperation performance indes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:568
  • 點閱點閱:57
     經由整合層級程序分析法( Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)、熵 ( Entropy )、 以及理想解和反理想解( Ideal and Anti-ideal Solutions )的概念, 本文提出一個貨櫃碼頭營運作業績效評估模式。 首先,建構一個包含五個營運作業績效指標、十項準則和三個替代方案(貨櫃基地)之層級 結構。然後,使用層級程序分析法評估五個營運作業績效指標和十項準則的主觀權數,並且 以熵值權重法( Entropy Measure of Importance )求解替代方案層之上一層所含各評估 準則之客觀權數。進而,整合主觀和客觀權數,求取每一評估準則之綜合權數。接著,引用 理想解和反理想解的概念, 求得替代方案對理想解的相對接近值( Value of Relative Closeness ),並根據各替代方案的相對接近值,進行待估之不同替代方案之排序。 最後,以基隆港三個貨櫃基地營運作業績效之評估為例,說明本文中所提出之貨櫃碼頭營運 作業績效評估模式的實作過程。
     From combining the concepts of analytic hierarchy process(AHP), entropy, ideal and anti-ideal solutions, an operation performance evaluation model for container terminal is developed. At first, a hierarchical structrue with five operation performance indices and ten evaluating criteria as well as three container terminals is constructed. Then, the AHP is used to assess the subjective weightings of five operation performance indices and ten criteria. The objective weights of the evaluating criteria represented in the upper level of container terminals are obtained through the method of entropy measure of importance. Furthermore, by means of aggregating subjective and objective assessment about criteria weightings, the synthetic weights for each criterion can be obtained. And, citing the concepts of ideal and anti-ideal solutions, the value of relative closeness of various container terminals versus ideal solution can be calculated. Based on the value of relative closeness, the ranking order of operation performance for various container terminals can be obtained. Finally, a practical operation performance evaluation about the Keelung Port's three container terminals was used to demonstrate the computational process of this model developed in this paper.
期刊論文
1.倪安順(19921100)。臺灣地區國際港埠營運分析。中華港埠,21(1-4),1-38。  延伸查詢new window
2.高傳凱(1994)。基隆港貨櫃基地營運績效評估。港埠研究報告,40,26-59。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱金元(19911200)。高雄港貨櫃碼頭營運作業績效指標之研究。運輸計劃季刊,20(4),427-460。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.台灣省政府交通處港灣技術研究所(1995)。改進台灣地區各港埠貨櫃營運之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊文賢(1993)。基隆港貨櫃碼頭營運績效之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Thomas, B. J.(1985)。Operations Planning in Ports。Cardiff:Department of Maritime Studies, University of Wales, Institute of Science and Technology。  new window
2.Carl, H.、Plumlee, P. E.(1979)。Port Performance Index。Port Hueneme, CA:Public Works Consultants。  new window
3.邱盛生、倪安順(1992)。台灣地區國際港埠作業效率之比較分析。交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳榮貴(1990)。貨物裝卸作業指標研究參考意見。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳清在(1996)。交通指標體系建立之研究。交通部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
6.卓武雄(1992)。多重準繩決策。台北:曉園出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Frankel、Ernst G.(1979)。Port Capacity, Productivity & Effectiveness Measurement。M.I.T. Press。  new window
8.Saaty, Thomas L.(1980)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。McGraw-Hill。  new window
其他
1.倪安順(1993)。我國國際港埠營運績效與評比制度之建立,台灣省交通處港灣技術研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hoffmann, P.(1985)。Performance Indicators and Productivity。Port management textbook: containerization。Bremen:Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE