:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:當強制徵收成為政府補貼?--美國聯邦最高法院Kelo v. City of New London案之評析
作者:陳志民
書刊名:土地與政治;施正鋒, 徐世榮 (主編)
頁次:345-396
出版日期:2013
出版項:新北:李登輝民主協會
主題關鍵詞:強制徵收土地徵收政府補貼
學門:經濟學
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
期刊論文
1.鍾玉美(20050600)。現行土地徵收補償制度之探討。土地問題研究季刊,4(2)=14,74-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Munch, Partricia(1976)。An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain。Journal of Political Economy,84(3),473-498。  new window
3.Knetsch, Jack L.、Sinden, John A.(1984)。Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of An Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value。Quarterly Journal of Economics,99(3),507-521。  new window
4.Garnett, Nicole Stelle(2003)。The Public-Use Question as a Takings Problem。George Washington Law Review,71(6),934-982。  new window
5.Talley, Brett(2006)。Restraining Eminent Domain through Just Compensation: Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005)。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,29(2),759-768。  new window
6.賴樹奎(20040300)。健全多元配套機制,解決私有既成道路補償問題。土地問題研究季刊,3(1)=9,37-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Been, Vicki(1991)。'Exit' as a Constraint on Land Use Exactions: Rethinking the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine。Columbia Law Review,91(3),473-545。  new window
8.Brnovich, Mark(2004)。Condemning Condemnation: Alternatives to Eminent Domain。Policy Report of Goldwater Institute,195,1-21。  new window
9.Cohen, Charles E.(2006)。Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument Banning Economic Development Takings。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,29(2),491-568。  new window
10.Ellickson, Robert C.(1973)。Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls。University of Chicago Law Review,40(4),681-781。  new window
11.Fischel, William A.(2004)。The Political Economy of Public Use in Poletown: How Federal Grants Encourage Excessive Use of Eminent Domain。Michigan State Law Review,2004,929-955。  new window
12.Calabresi, Guido、Melamed, A. Douglas(1972)。Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral。Harvard Law Review,85(6),1089-1128。  new window
13.Kochan, Donald J.(1998)。"Public Use" and the Independent Judiciary: Condemnation in an Interest-group Perspective。Texas Review of Law and Policy,3(1),49-116。  new window
14.Coughlin, Michael J.(2005)。Absolute Deference Leads to Unconstitutional Governance: The Need for a New Public Use Rule。Catholic University Law Review,54,1001-1038。  new window
15.Sales, Nathan Alexander(1999)。Classical Republicanism and the Fifth Amendment's "Public Use" Requirement。Duke Law Journal,49,339-382。  new window
16.Hart, John F.(1996)。Colonial Land Use Law and Its Significance for Modern Takings Doctrine。Harvard Law Review,109(6),1252-1300。  new window
17.Hoffman, Elizabeth、Spitzer, Matthew L.(1985)。Entitlement, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concept of Distributive Justice。Journal of Legal Studies,14(2),259-297。  new window
18.Wallace, Scott(2007)。Last of the Amazon。National Geographic,2007(Jan.),40-71。  new window
19.Somin, Ilya(2004)。Overcoming Poletown: County of Wayne v. Hathcock, Economic Development Taking, and the Future of Public Use。Michigan State Law Review,2004(4),1005-1039。  new window
20.Michaelman, Frank I.(1967)。Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of "Just Compensation" Law。Harvard Law Review,80(6),1165-1258。  new window
21.Krier, James E.、Serkin, Christopher(2004)。Public Ruse。Michigan State Law Review,2004,859-876。  new window
22.Lazzarotti, Joseph J.(1999)。Public Use or Public Abuse。UMKC Law Review,68,49-75。  new window
23.Bukowczyk, John J.(1984)。The Decline and Fall of a Detroit Neighborhood: Poletown vs. G.M. and the City of Detroit。Washington and Lee Law Review,41,49-76。  new window
24.Merrill, Thomas W.(1986)。The Economics of Public Use。Cornell Law Review,72,61-116。  new window
25.Meidinger, Errol E.(1980)。The Public Uses of Eminent Domain。Environmental Law,11,1-66。  new window
26.Fennell, Lee Anne(2004)。Taking Eminent Domain Apart。Michigan State Law Review,2004(4),957-1004。  new window
學位論文
1.張嘉紋(2001)。我國土地徵收法制之探討--以行政法院裁判為中心(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Epstein, Richard A.(1985)。Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Staley, Samuel R.、Blair, John P.、Domain, Eminent(2005)。Private Property and Redevelopment: An Economic Development Analysis。Los Angeles:Reason Foundation Press。  new window
3.陳新民(1992)。憲法基本權利之基本理論。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20070524)。徵地補償,神秘果賺中科一億,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/may/24/today-so4.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blumer, Tom(20071130)。Kelo Update: Media Ignores Latest New London Development Setback,http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2007/11/30/kelo-update-media-ignores-latest-new-london-development-setback。  new window
圖書論文
1.Holmes, Oliver Wendell(1992)。Letter from Oliver Wendell Holmes to Harold J. Laski。The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions, and other Writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.李建良(2006)。損失補償。行政法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE