:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:第三波民主潮下之憲政改革--臺灣與捷克比較
書刊名:思與言
作者:魏千峰
作者(外文):Wei, Chien-feng
出版日期:2000
卷期:38:1
頁次:頁1-44
主題關鍵詞:第三波民主潮制(修)憲原則社會主義憲政權力分立國際人權入憲一機關二階段修憲憲政文化憲法化魅力公平儲蓄原則新開端憲政時刻The third wave of democratizationPriciples of Constitutional-makingSocialist constitutionalismSeparation of powersInternational bill of rightsConstitutional-amending of one organization and two stagesConstitutional cultureConstitutionatization of charismaJust saving principleNew beginningConstututional moment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:93
  • 點閱點閱:606
     一九九○年前後,前東歐共黨國家(包括捷克)及臺灣等威權國家 邁向民主化,掀起第三波民主潮之高峰,惟臺灣在國際上雖被認為開 發中國家中經濟成長、政治自由化頗有成就的國家,但自一九八七年 臺灣解除戒嚴後,歷經五次修憲,卻未將憲政改革推展至令人滿意之 地步。而在地球另一端的捷克,於共黨政權崩潰後,針對本身之歷史社 經背景,仿效美國及德國憲政,建立權力分立及國際人權習慣法入憲, 在比較憲政上頗有可觀之處。本文介紹第三波民主潮之概念、制憲(修 憲)原則及捷克、臺灣兩國憲政改革之情況,並評析我國憲政之缺失, 期待在此總統之選之際,提供國外成功經驗,以供關心我國憲政前途 之士參考。
Before and after 1990, the Former East-Europe communist countries (including Czech) and Taiwan those undemocratic countries marched toward democratization. It rose the summit of the third wave of democratization. Although Taiwan has high economic growth and good political freedom, she has not made a success of constitutional reform after five Constitutional Law-amendings. Czech, on other corner of the earth, focused her own histoical, political and economical conditions to learn constitutional experiences from U.S. and West Germany. She establised the separation of powes and let international bill of rights into her Constitutional Law. This essay introduces the concepts of the third wave of democratization, priciples of constitutional-making and comparison constitutional reforms of Czech and Taiwan. The writer hope it can provide foreign constitutional experiences for the future constitutional reforms of Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Ackerman, Bruce(1997)。The Rise of World Constitutionalism。Virginia Law Review,83,771-797。  new window
2.Elster, Jon(1995)。Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process。Duke Law Journal,45(2),364-396。  new window
3.許志雄(19970700)。從比較憲法觀點論「雙首長制」。月旦法學,26,30-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳釗變(19980300)。臺灣民主化的回顧與前瞻。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,1(3),1-21。  延伸查詢new window
5.薛化元(19970700)。中華民國憲政藍圖的歷史演變--行政權為中心的考察。月旦法學,26,10-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃昭元(19980100)。九七修憲後我國中央政府體制的評估。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),183-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.許宗力(19960415)。兩岸關係法律定位百年來的演變與最新發展--臺灣的角度出發。月旦法學,12,39-47。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉俊榮(19980100)。九七憲改與臺灣憲法變遷的模式。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),7-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳愛娥(19970700)。國民大會作為第二院?。月旦法學,26,22-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.湯德宗(19980100)。論九七修憲後的權力分立--憲改工程的另類選擇。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),135-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.葉俊榮、黃昭元(19980100)。「九七憲改之檢討」學術研討會導言。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),1-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.魏千峰(1999)。財產權之基本理論研究--以國家與人民之關係為限(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許介鱗(19960900)。戰後台灣史記。台北:文英堂出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ackerman, B.(1992)。The future of liberal revolution。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
3.劉慶瑞(1976)。比較憲法。臺北:大中國圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.林紀東(1997)。中華民國憲法釋論。台北:大中國圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳新民(19991000)。中華民國憲法釋論。臺北市:陳新民。  延伸查詢new window
6.許慶雄(1992)。憲法入門。臺北:月旦出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1991)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
8.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.Rosenn, Keith S.(1990)。Brazil’s New Constitution: An Exercise in Transient Constitutionalism for a Transitional Society。  new window
2.Reisman, W. Michael.(1994)。Constitutionalism in the Post-Cold War Era- Introductory Remarks。  new window
3.Levenberg, Peter N.(1995)。South Africa’s New Constitution: Will It Last?。  new window
4.Goldstone, Richard J.(1997)。The South African Bill of Right。  new window
5.Ssekandi, Francis M. ; Gitta, Cos.(1994)。Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Uganda Constitution。  new window
6.Osiatynski, Wiktor(1994)。Rights in New Constitutions of East Central Europe。  new window
7.Henderson, Karen ; Robinson, Neil.(1997)。Post-Communist Politics。  new window
8.Krygier, Martin(1996)。The Constitution of the Hart。  new window
9.Henckerts, Jean-Marie ; Van Der Jeught, Stefann(1998)。Human Rights Protection Under the New Constitutions of Central Europe。  new window
10.Cutler, Lloyd ; Schwartz, Herman(1991)。Constitutional Reform in Czechoslovakia: E Duobus Unum?。  new window
11.Van Doren, Jack ; Magstadt, Thomas(1997)。Czech Constitutional Democracy: Focus on the Czech Dual Executive Power and the Future Senate。  new window
12.Teitel, Ruti.(1994)。Post-Communist Constitutonalism: A Transitional Perspective。  new window
13.Ludwikowski, Rett R.(1998)。“Mixed” Constitutions-Product of an East-Central European Constitutional Melting Pot。  new window
14.Ludwikowski, Rett R.(1993)。Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development。  new window
15.Glos, George E.(1994)。The Constitution of the Czech Republic of 1992。  new window
16.Stein, Eric.(1997)。Out of the Ashes of a Federation, Two New Constitutions。  new window
17.荊知仁(198703)。中國立憲史。  延伸查詢new window
18.王祖述(1999)。孫中山五權憲法思想研究新見。  延伸查詢new window
19.劉義周(19951021)。我國憲法變遷的動力。  延伸查詢new window
20.申慶壁(199203)。第二階段修憲的體認與建議。  延伸查詢new window
21.謝瑞智(1994)。修憲春秋--整個修憲過程的記實。  延伸查詢new window
22.許慶雄(199807)。憲法入門II。  延伸查詢new window
23.許宗力(199004)。憲政改革途徑的比較分析與建議。  延伸查詢new window
24.林子儀(19991103)。憲政災害復建不能再拖了。  延伸查詢new window
25.張君勵(199709)。中華民國民主憲法十講。  延伸查詢new window
26.Chemrinsky, Ewin(1997)。Constitutional Law。  new window
27.Andries, Edward M.(1999)。On the German Constitution’s Fiftieth Anniversary: Jacqaes Maritain and the 1949 Basic Law。  new window
28.Nygeard, Richard L.(1994)。A Bill of Right for the Twenty-First Century。  new window
29.Ingram, Attracta(1994)。A Political Theory of Rights。  new window
30.劉慶瑞(199612)。比較憲法。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE