The Birth and Rebirth of the Judicial Review in Taiwan--Its Establishment, Empowerment, and Evolvement_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	The Birth and Rebirth of the Judicial Review in Taiwan--Its Establishment, Empowerment, and Evolvement
書刊名：	National Taiwan University Law Review
作者：	林建志
作者(外文)：	Lin, Chien-chih
出版日期：	2012
卷期：	7:1
頁次：	頁167-222
主題關鍵詞：	臺灣憲法法院；司法違憲審查；憲法解釋；保險理論；權威留存；Taiwanese constitutional court；Judicial review；Constitutional interpretation；Insurance theory；Hegemonic preservation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:70 點閱:51

為什麼臺灣人會認同司法違憲審查？在過去七十年間，什麼因素促成臺灣司法違憲審查的創建、賦權與發展？這是本文所要討論的主要問題。本文一開始簡要介紹幾個解釋司法違憲審查的理論模型，並試圖尋找最吻合臺灣司法違憲審查的理論。然而由於過去臺灣的政治劇變，沒有一個理論可以完整地解釋臺灣的司法違憲審查發展，不同的理論模型只能說明不同階段的臺灣司法違憲審查。在創建時期，憲法法院非常順從，但在轉型時期，如同保險模型所預測的，憲法法院逐漸取回應有的權力與權威。政治環境的不穩定以及缺少過去不容質疑的威權，人們渴望有一個公平且中立的裁決者，而憲法法院正好順勢而起。除了政治操作外，即便是在社會高度分裂的2000年之後，憲法法院也積極、並謹慎的擴張其權力。然而在新興民主國家的脈絡下，司法違憲審查的運作必須特別小心。在一方面來說，司法化的傾向提供憲法法院絕佳的機會參與政治決策的過程，但在另一方面，這也可能造成損及憲法法院威信的政治危機。

以文找文

ABSTRACT This paper first briefly introduces several major models that explain the emergence of judicial review in an attempt to find one that best elucidates the situation in Taiwan. Yet, owing to its particular political history, no single model can fully explain the development of judicial review in Taiwan. Rather, different models may be used to account for different stages. During the foundational stage, the Court was subservient to the authoritarian regime. During its transition stage, the Court regained authority and began to function like a court that insurance theory presupposes. Owing to the changeable political environment and the lack of an unchallengeable authority, the need for a fair and apolitical arbitrator increased, a fact which explains the increase in judicial power. Besides, political manipulation, the Court also expanded its power actively and cautiously, even when society was highly divided after 2000. In new democracies, the tendency of judicialization has provided the Court with more opportunities to intervene in political decision-making processes. Nonetheless, this may spawn unintended political conflict that threatens to damage the integrity and authority of the judiciary.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Chang, Wen-chen(20080900)。East Asian Foundations for Constitutionalism: Three Models Reconstructed。National Taiwan University Law Review，3(2)，111-113+115-141。
2.	張文貞(2005)。The Role of Judicial Review in Consolidating Democracies: The Case of Taiwan。Asia Law Review，2(2)，73-88。
3.	Dahl, Robert A.(1957)。Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker。Journal of Public Law，6(1)，279-295。
4.	Garlicki, Lech(2007)。Constitutional courts versus supreme courts。International Journal of Constitutional Law，5，44-68。
5.	Garoupa, N.、Grembi V.、Lin S. C. P.(2011)。Explaining constitutional review in new democracies: The case of Taiwan。Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal，20，1-40。
6.	Law, David S.(2009)。A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review。Georgetown Law Journal，97(3)，723-802。
7.	Rosenberg, Gerald N.(1992)。Judicial independence and the reality of political power。Review of Politics，54(3)，369-398。
8.	Yeh, Jiunn Rong、Chang, Wen Chen(2011)。The Emergence of East Asian Constitutionalism: Features in Comparison。American Journal of Comparative Law，59(3)，805-839。
9.	Law, D. S.(2008)。The Anatomy of a conservative court: Judicial Review in Japan。Texas Law Review，87，1545-1594。
10.	Hirschl, R.(2006)。The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide。Fordham Law Review，75(2)，721-754。
11.	Yeh, Jiunn-rong(20080900)。Democracy-driven Transformation to Regulatory State: The Case of Taiwan。National Taiwan University Law Review，3(2)，31-59。
12.	Stephenson, Matthew C.(2003)。'When the Devil Turns...': The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review。Journal of Legal Studies，32(1)，59-89。
13.	李建良(19980100)。大法官的制度變革與司法院的憲法定位--從第四次憲法增修條文談起。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，27(2)，217-262。延伸查詢
14.	黃昭元(20031100)。司法違憲審查的正當性爭議--理論基礎與方法論的初步檢討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(6)，103-151。延伸查詢
15.	葉俊榮(19980100)。九七憲改與臺灣憲法變遷的模式。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，27(2)，7-47。延伸查詢
16.	黃昭元(20030900)。司法違憲審查的制度選擇與司法院定位。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(5)，55-118。延伸查詢
17.	翁岳生(20110615)。司法院大法官之解釋與臺灣民主政治及法治主義之發展。臺灣法學雜誌，178，1-22。延伸查詢
18.	葉俊榮(20031100)。轉型法院的自我定位：論憲法解釋對修憲機制的影響。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(6)，29-59。延伸查詢
19.	McCubbins, Mathew D.、Schwartz, Thomas(1984)。Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms。American Journal of Political Science，28(1)，165-179。
20.	Bilder, M. S.(2008)。Idea or practice: A brief historiography of judicial review。Journal of Policy History，20，6-25。
21.	Chen, T. Y.(2005)。Lun “319 chiangchi shihchien chenhsiang tiaocha tepieh weiyuanhui tiaoli” chih weihsienhsing [On the constitutionality of the “Act to Form a Special Investigative Committee in Search of the Truth of 319 Gun Shot”]。Taiwan Law Review，125，48-62。
22.	Davis, M. C.(2004)。Constitutionalism and new democracies。George Washington International Law Review，36，681-694。
23.	Epstein, L.、Knight, J.、Shvetsova, O.(2001)。The role of constitutional courts in the establishment and maintenance of democratic systems of government。Law and Society Review，35，117-163。
24.	Fa, J. p.(1991)。Constitutional developments in Taiwan: The role of the Council of Grand Justices。International and Comparative Law Quarterly，40，198-209。
25.	Ginsburg, T.、Elkins, Z.(2009)。Ancillary powers of constitutional courts。Texas Law Review，87，1439-1440。
26.	Hirschl, R.(2000)。The political origins of judicial empowerment through constitutionalization: Lessons from four constitutional revolutions。Law & Social Inquiry，25，91-149。
27.	Hirschl, R.(2009)。The “Design Sciences” and Constitutional “Success”。Texas Law Review，87，1339-1374。
28.	廖元豪(200601)。論立法院調查權的界限與範圍--釋字第五八五號解釋與美國經驗的參照。臺灣本土法學雜誌，78，83-91。延伸查詢
29.	Liu, L. S. L.(1991)。Judicial review and emerging constitutionalism: The uneasy case for the Republic of China on Taiwan。American Journal of Comparative Law，39，509-558。
30.	Ramseyer, J. M.(2003)。The puzzling (in) dependence of courts: A comparative approach。Journal of Legal Study，23，721-748。
31.	Roesler, S.(2007)。Permutations of judicial power: The new constitutionalism and the expansion of judicial authority。Law and Social Inquiry，32，545-580。
32.	Romeu, F. R.(2006)。The establishment of constitutional courts: A study of 128 democratic constitutions。Review of Law and Economics，2，103-135。
33.	蘇永欽(200505)。喬太守式的分權，灑狗血般的人權--簡評政治壓力鍋煮出來的五八五號解釋。臺灣本土法學雜誌，70，38-57。延伸查詢
34.	Tezlaff, T.(2006)。Kelsen’s concept of constitutional review accord in Europe and Asia: The Grand Justices in Taiwan。National Taiwan University Law Review，1(2)，75-107。
35.	葉悛榮(201106)。制與分裂社會：臺灣與南韓憲法法院裁判的比較研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，40(2)，459-504。延伸查詢
36.	Yeh, J. -r.、Chang, W. C.(200903)。The Changing Landscape of Modern Constitutionalism: Transitional Perspective。National Taiwan University Law Review，4(1)，145-183。

會議論文
1.	Ginsburg, T.(200806)。Judicial review in new democracies: constitutional courts in Asian cases。Roundtable series of rule of law and protection of human rights in East Asia。Taipei：the meeting of College of Law, National Taiwan University。
2.	Yeh, J. -r.(201106)。The politics of unconstitutionality: An empirical analysis of judicial deadlines and political compliance in Taiwan。The Second International Conference on Empirical Studies of Judicial Systems。Taipei：the meeting of the Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica。

學位論文
1.	Chang, W. C.(2001)。Transition to Democracy, Constitutionalism, and Judicial Activism: Taiwan in Comparative Constitutional Perspective(碩士論文)。Yale Law School。

圖書
1.	Hirschl, Ran(2004)。Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。
2.	Hamilton, A.、Madison, J.、Jay, J.(1982)。The Federalist Papers。New York, NY：Bantam。
3.	Epstein, Lee、Knight, Jack(1998)。The Choices Justices Make。Washington, D. C.：CQ Press。
4.	Hassell, G.、Saunders, C.(2002)。Asia-Pacific Constitutional Systems。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
5.	Rosenberg, Gerald N.(2008)。The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。
6.	Shapiro, Martin、Sweet, Alec Stone(2002)。On Law, Politics, and Judicialization。Oxford University Press。
7.	McCloskey, R. G.(2010)。The American Supreme Court。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。
8.	Elkins, Zachary、Ginsburg, Tom、Melton, James(2009)。The Endurance of National Constitutions。Cambridge University Press。
9.	Guarnieri, Carlo、Pederzoli, Patrizia(2002)。The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy。Oxford University Press。
10.	Sunstein, Cass R.(1999)。One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
11.	Ackerman, Bruce(1991)。We the People: Foundations。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
12.	Chavez, Rebecca Bill(2004)。The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina。Stanford University Press。
13.	Ely, John Hart(1980)。Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review。Harvard University Press。
14.	Ginsburg, Tom(2003)。Judicial review in new democracies: constitutional courts in Asian cases。Cambridge University Press。
15.	Hardin, R.(1999)。Liberalism, constitutionalism, and democracy。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
16.	Helmke, G.(2004)。Courts under constraints: Judges, generals, and presidents in Argentina。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
17.	Hsueh, H. Y.(1993)。Minchu hsiencheng yu mintsuchui te piencheng fachan--Chang Chun Mai ssuhsiang yenchiu [The development of democratic constitutionalism and nationalism--A research on Chang Chun Mai’s thinking]。Taipei：Tao He。
18.	Langran, R.(2004)。The supreme court: A concise history。New York, NY：Peter Lang。
19.	Long, S.(1991)。Taiwan: Chinas last frontier。London：Macmillan Press。
20.	Miao, C. C.(1989)。Chungkuo chihhsienshih tzuliao huipien [The compilation of information concerning the Chinese constitutional making history]。Taipei：Academia Historica。
21.	Rosenfeld, M.(2010)。The identity of the constitutional subject: Selfhood, citizenship, culture, and community。London：Routledge University Press。
22.	Secretariat of Judicial Yuan(1998)。Tafakuan shihhsien shihliao [History documents of Judicial Yuan Interpretations]。Taipei：Secretariat of Judicial Yuan。
23.	Secretariat of the National Assembly(1946)。Koumin Tahui shihlu [Records of the National Assembly]。Taipei：Secretariat of the National Assembly。

其他
1.	Central Election Commission。The list of party proportion in the 1995 legislative election，http://db.cec.gov.tw/pdf/B1995005.pdf。
2.	Chang, C. M.(1971)。Ten speeches concerning the Constitution of Republic of China，Taipei：The Commercial Press。
3.	Ginsburg, T.(2006)。Constitutional choices in Taiwan: Implications of global trends，http://papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=877154。
4.	Weng Y.-s.(20110706)。An oral interview with the fromer President of Judicial Yuan Yueh-Shen Weng/Interviewer: Chien-Chih Lin。
5.	Yuan, Judicial(2011)。Statistics of Interpretations from the First term to the Sixth term，http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/uploadfile/El00...htm。

圖書論文
1.	Ginsburg, T.(2008)。The global spread of constitutional review。The Oxford handbook of law and politics。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
2.	Tate, C. Neal(1995)。Why the Expansion of Judicial Power?。The Global Expansion of Judicial Power。New York, NY：New York University。
3.	Rubinstein, A. M.(1999)。Political Taiwanization and Pragmatic Diplomacy: The Eras of Chiang Ching-kuo and Lee Teng-hui, 1971-1994。Taiwan: A New History。Armonk, NY。
4.	Chavez, R. B.(2008)。The rule of law and courts in democratizing regimes。The Oxford handbook of law and politics。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
5.	Garber, M. A.(1999)。The problematic establishment of judicial review。The Supreme Court in American politics: New institutionalist approaches。Lawrance, KS：University Press of Kansas。
6.	Ginsburg, T.(2005)。Beyond judicial review: Ancillary power of constitutional courts。Institutions and public Law: Comparative approaches。New York, NY：Peter Lang。
7.	Ginsburg, T.(2008)。Administrative law and the judicial control of agents in authoritarian regimes。Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
8.	Ginsburg, T.(2010)。The Constitutional Court and the judicialization of Korean politics。New courts in Asia。London, England：Routledge University Press。
9.	Hilbink, L.(2008)。Agents of anti-politics: Courts in Pinochet’s Chile。Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
10.	Lee, C. L.(2009)。60 Years retrospect and the new challenge as human rights guardian: Exploring the counter-majoritarian difficulty of Grand Justices’ interpretations of human rights。Constitutional interpretation: Theory and practice。
11.	McCann, M.(1999)。How the Supreme Court matters in American politics: New Institutionalist perspectives。The Supreme Court in American politics。Lawrence, KS：University Press of Kansas。
12.	Moustafa, T.(2007)。The politics of domination: Law and resistance in authoritarian states。The struggle for constitutional power: Law, politics, and economic development in Eygpt。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
13.	Root, H. L.、May, K.(2008)。Judicial systems and economic development。Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
14.	Rubinstein, M. A.(1999)。Taiwan’s socioeconomic modernization, 1971-1996。Taiwan: A New History。New York, NY：M. E. Sharpe。
15.	Shapiro, M.(2004)。Judicial review in developed democracies。Democratization and the judiciary: The accountability function of courts in new democracies。London：Frank Cass Publishers。
16.	Shapiro, M.(2008)。Courts in authoritarian regimes。Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
17.	Silverstein, G.(2008)。Singapore: The exception that proves rules matter。Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
18.	Tang, D. T. C.(2005)。Chuanli funli yu weihsien shencha [Judicial review and separation of powers]。Chuanli fenli hsin lun (2): Weihsien shencha yu tungtai pingheng [A new perspective on separation of powers (2): Judicial review and Dynamic Balance]。Taipei：Angle。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	論行政法院在暫時權利保護程序中聲請法規範憲法審查
2.	重審臺灣憲法法院的政治角色--以大法官釋字第261號為例
3.	裁判憲法審查之裁判結果、宣告方式與效力
4.	日本憲法學上的憲法裁判論及其在兩岸之影響
5.	認真對待大法官解釋：論大法官解釋之落實
6.	迎接司法國的到來？以釋字第748號解釋為例
7.	憲法法院作為積極立法者
8.	許可上訴制、美國最高法院與金字塔型訴訟建構
9.	從「我們的憲法從「我們的憲法」、「我們」到「我們的釋憲者」：形塑非國民之憲法上權利主體
10.	雅典民主與法治如何相輔相成？以埃斯奇尼斯與德摩特尼斯的法庭演說為例
11.	Joyous Buddha, Holy Father, and Dragon God Desiring Sex: A Case Study of Rape by Religious Fraud in Taiwan
12.	司法審查、選舉制度與民主代表性--從司法院釋字第721號解釋談起
13.	從風險預防觀點檢討釋字第699號解釋：酒後駕車的交通法規範分析
14.	我國與日本違憲審查制度之比較
15.	馬來亞制憲過程與族群糾葛：一個憲政闕失的初步考察

1.	兩岸經濟行政法制之比較研究-以攤販管理行政為中心
2.	兩岸違憲審查制度之比較研究-從行政法五大架構分析
3.	長期照顧行政法制之研究
4.	我國半總統制的形成與少數政府憲政困境—歷史制度主義的觀點
5.	我國與法國違憲審查制度之比較研究
6.	我國高階政務及事務官員調動的模式：以行政院為例，1988~2010
7.	司法違憲審查在台灣民主鞏固時期之角色分析
8.	司法審查中平等權之研究--比較法觀點
9.	臺灣政治民主化下刑事人權法制之立法變遷
10.	我國政黨修憲協商策略研究(1996-2000)
11.	我國法官彈劾與懲戒制度之研究
12.	我國與法國憲政體制之比較研究

1.	當代轉型正義的制度與規範脈絡：兼論南韓與臺灣的經驗比較
2.	半總統制的理論與實際
3.	行政法院的治理功能：東亞視野與臺灣觀點
4.	東亞法院形貌初探：三種模式的浮現
5.	百年來中華民國國會體制及其後設理念之探討
6.	憲法訴訟與基本權保障

無相關著作

1.	Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Case of Taiwan

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫