:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文化殊異學生學習潛能評估之研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:郭靜姿 引用關係張蘭畹王曼娜盧冠每
作者(外文):Kuo, Ching-chihChang, Lan-wenWang, Mann-naLu, Kuan-mei
出版日期:2000
卷期:19
頁次:頁253-278
主題關鍵詞:動態評量潛能發展區間文化殊異資賦優異Dynamic assessmentZPDCulturally diversityGiftedness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:44
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究旨在運用動態評量的方式評估文化殊異學生的潛能。研究工具包括:1.新編中華智力量表及其相關例題;2.動態評量施測手冊及紀錄紙。動態評量介入模式採:標準化前測-介入教學-標準化後測。介入方式分為:作答前介入、作答中介入(少量、中度、大量)及作答後介入。評量結果旨在分析受試學生之潛能發展區間(ZPD),並做為未來設計文化殊異資優學生充實課程之參考。 本研究總計施測了12位原住民學生與6位僑生。評量結果發現學生之潛能發展區間平均為1.5個標準差(僑生平均1.6個標準差,原住民平均1.5個標準差)。就全體受試在前後測得分及各分測驗之平均數觀之,受試學生在各分測驗表現中,發展區間較為寬廣的分測驗依序為:圖形推理(M=2.0)、視覺記憶(M=1.4)、圖形統合(M=1.4)及邏輯推理(M=1.4);發展區間較為狹窄的分測驗依序為:語文關係(M=0.9)、語詞記憶(M=1.1)、及數學推理(M=1.1)。 18位受試學生之潛能發展區間介於0.5~1.0個標準差者有2人,介於1.1~1.5個標準差者有9人,介於1.6~2.0個標準差者有5人,介於2.1~2.5個標準差有2人。在動態評量之後,智商達到120以上者在十八位受試中有八位。這八位學生原來在標準化前測中僅有一位智力達到資優鑑定的標準。研究者認為未來國內若能運用動態評量方式發掘文化殊異學生潛藏的才能,並藉由充實教學的機會協助其掘長補短,將可提高文化殊異學生之整體學習表現。
     The purpose of this research was to design a dynamic assessment model to assess the learning potentials of culturally diverse students. The instruments used were: 1.The New Edition of Chinese Intelligence Battery, 2.The Manual for Dynamic Assessment and Recording Sheets. Using a Pretest-Mediation (mild degree, moderate degree, and largely degree)-Posttest model, totally there were 12 aboriginal and 6 oversea Chinese students given with dynamic assessment. Finding revealed that the students had wider ZPD in the aspects of figural inference, visual memory, figural integration and logical reasoning while narrower ZPD in the aspects of verbal relationship, verbal memory and mathematical reasoning. The average ZPD was 1.5 SD. Comparing to eight of the students reached IQ 120 in the posttest, there was only one of them met the requisition of the talented identification criteria in the pretest. It was suggested to adopt dynamic assessment to discover the strength of culturally diverse talented students in the future and offer enrichment activities to enable them to develop their hidden potentials.
期刊論文
1.張正芬、吳淑敏(19980600)。「自閉症兒童發展測驗」之編製及相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊,16,291-314。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭靜姿、張蘭畹、林秋妹、王曼娜、盧冠每(19990600)。文化殊異學生之學習特質研究。特殊教育研究學刊,17,325-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jitendra, A. K.、Kameenui, E. J.(1993)。An exploratory study of dynamic assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices' performance in solving part-whole mathematical word problems。Diagnostique,18(4),305-325。  new window
4.Jitendra, A. K.、Kameenui, E. J.(1993)。Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis。Remedial and Special Education,14(5),6-18。  new window
5.許家吉、洪碧霞、吳鐵雄(19950100)。電腦化動態圖形歸類測驗發展之研究。測驗年刊,42,29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.江秋坪、洪碧霞、邱上真(19960100)。動態評量對國語資源班學童鑑別與協助效益之探討。測驗年刊,43,115-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Burns, M. S.、Vye, N. J.、Bransford, J. D.、Delclos, V.、Ogan, T.(1987)。Static and dynamic measures of learning in young handicapped children。Diagnostique,12(2),59-73。  new window
8.LeRose, R. P.(1978)。A quota system for gifted minority children: A viable solution。The Gifted Child Quarterly,22(3),394-403。  new window
9.吳國銘、洪碧霞、邱上貞(19950100)。國小學童在動態評量中數學解題學習歷程與遷移效益之探討。測驗年刊,42,61-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Miller, George A.(1956)。The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information。The Psychological Review,63(2),81-97。  new window
11.林秀娟、林清山、張紹勳(1994)。動態評量結合試題反應理論在空間視覺學習潛能評量之研究。測驗年刊,41,73-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bruch, C.(1971)。Modification of procedures for identification of the disadvantage gifted。Gifted Child Quarterly,15,267-272。  new window
13.Enns, James T.、Rensink, Ronald A.(1990)。Influence of Scene-based Properties on Visual Search。Science,247(4943),721-723。  new window
14.Fitz-Gibbon, C. T.(1975)。The identification of mentally gifted 'disadvantaged' students at the eighth grade level。Journal of Negro Education,43(1),53-66。  new window
15.Mingolla, E.、Grossberg, S.、Ross, W. D.(1994)。A Neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations。Psychological Review,101(3),470-489。  new window
會議論文
1.林素微、洪碧霞(1997)。國小六年級學童解題彈性思考動態測量之研究。沒有紀錄。173-191。  延伸查詢new window
2.Skuy, M.(1988)。Dynamic assessment of academically superior children in low socioeconomic status communities。沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Zorman, Rachel(1997)。Eureka - the cross-cultural model for identification of hidden talent through enrichment。Seattle, WA。  new window
研究報告
1.郭靜姿、張蘭畹、王曼娜、林秋妹、盧冠每(1998)。文化殊異資優學生鑑定模式與評量之研究(一)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭靜姿、張蘭畹、王曼娜、盧冠每(1999)。文化殊異資優學生鑑定模式與評量之第二年研究成果報告。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭靜姿、張蘭畹、王曼娜、盧冠每(1999)。動態評量介入手冊與紀錄紙。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊麗娟(1996)。國小六年級浮力概念動態評量的效益分析(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林敏慧(1992)。國小輕度智障兒童學習潛能評量之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王曼娜(1997)。臺灣原住民國小學童學習潛能之釐測--運用動態評量模式(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chang, L. W.(1998)。Teaching thinking to children in Taiwan,United Kingdom。  new window
圖書
1.Lazear, D.(1991)。Seven ways of teaching: The artistry of teaching with multiple intelligence。Australia:Skylight Publishing, Inc.。  new window
2.Feuerstein, R.(1979)。The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques。The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques。Baltimore, MD:Addison-Wesley Publishing Corporation。  new window
3.李永吟、邱上真、科華崴、杜正治、林本喬、陳慶福、洪榮照、韓楷、董力華(1995)。學習輔導。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mayer, R. E.、林清山(1994)。教育心理學--認知取向。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Feuerstein, R.(1980)。Instrumental enrichment: an intervention program for cognitive modifiability。Baltimore, MD:University Park Press。  new window
6.Sharron, H.、Coulter, M.(1994)。Changing Children's Minds: Feuerstein's revolution in the teaching of intelligence。Birmingham:The Sharron Publishing Company。  new window
7.Klatzky, Roberta L.(1975)。Human Memory: Structures and Processes。San Francisco:W. H. Freeman。  new window
8.Maker, C. J.(1982)。Curriculum development for the gifted。Austin, Texas:PRO-ED, Inc.。  new window
9.鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學:理論與應用。臺北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ennis, R. H.(1996)。Critical thinking。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
11.Mayer, Richard E.(1987)。Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach。Don Mills:HaperCollins Publisher。  new window
12.林幸台、吳武典、胡致芬、蔡崇建、王振德、郭靜姿(1996)。新編中華智力量表(乙式)。新編中華智力量表(乙式)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
13.郭靜姿(1995)。資優學生的鑑定問題探討。開創資優教育的新世紀。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.Baldwin, A. Y.(1985)。Issues concerning minorities。The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives。Washington, DC。  new window
15.Baska, L.(1989)。Standardized testing for minority students: Is it fair?。Critical issues in gifted education。Austin, TX。  new window
16.Bensley, D. A.(1998)。Critical thinking in psychology: A unified-skills approach。Critical thinking in psychology: A unified-skills approach。Pacific Grove, CA。  new window
17.Black, H.、Parks, S.(1984)。Building Thinking Skill: Lesson Plans & Teacher's Manual。Building Thinking Skill: Lesson Plans & Teacher's Manual。Pacific Grove, CA。  new window
18.Conway, D. A.、Munson, R.(1997)。The elements of reasoning。The elements of reasoning。Belmont, CA。  new window
19.(1991)。Effective strategies for teaching reading。Effective strategies for teaching reading。Needham Heights, MA。  new window
20.Kaplan, S. N.(1974)。Providing programs for the gifted and talented: A handbook。Ventura, CA:Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools。  new window
21.Pressley, M.、Borkowski, J. G.、O'Sullivan, J. T.(1985)。Children's metamemory and teaching of memory strategies。Metacognition, cognition, and human performance。San Diego。  new window
22.Pressley, M.、Reynolds, W. M.、Stark, K. D.、Gettinger, M.(1983)。Cognitive strategy training and children's self-control。Cognitive strategy research: psychological foundation。New York, NY。  new window
23.Pressley, M.(1990)。Mathematics。Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance。Cambridge, MA。  new window
24.Pressley, M.、Woloshyn, V.(1995)。Mathematical problem solving。Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance。Cambridge, MA。  new window
25.Scheid, Karen(1993)。Helping students become strategic learners: Guidelines for teaching。Helping students become strategic learners: Guidelines for teaching。Cambridge, MA。  new window
26.Ward, V. S.(1961)。Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach。Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach。Columbus, OH。  new window
其他
1.Palmer, D. G.,Goetz, E. T.(1984)。The role of students' perception of study strategy and personal attributes in strategy use,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lidz, C. S.(1987)。Historical perspectives。Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Campione, J. C.、Brown, A. L.(1987)。Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement。Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential。Guilford Press。  new window
3.Borkowski, J. G.、Peck, V. A.(1986)。Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children。Conceptions of giftedness。Cambridge Press。  new window
4.Borkowski, J. G.、Kurtz, B. E.(1987)。Metacognition and executive control。Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and gifted。Norwood, NJ:Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
5.Weinstein, C. E.(1978)。Elaboration skills as a learning strategy。Learning strategies。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
6.Carlson, J. S.、Wiedl, K. H.(1992)。The dynamic assessment of intelligence。Interactive assessment。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
7.Embretson, S. E.(1987)。Toward development of a psychometric approach。Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
8.Feuerstein, R.、Rand, Y.、Jensen, M. R.、Kaniel, S.、Tzuriel, D.(1987)。Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential: The LPAD model。Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential。New York:The Guilford Press。  new window
9.Bezuk, N. S.、Cegelka, P. T.(1995)。Effective mathematics instruction for all students。Effective instruction for students with learning difficulties。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE