:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家庭政策之兩難--從傳統意識型態出發
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:許雅惠 引用關係
作者(外文):Sheu, Yea-huey
出版日期:2000
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁237-289
主題關鍵詞:家庭政策貧窮女性化傳統家庭意識型態照顧私有化Family policyFeminization of povertyChinese family ideology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:401
  • 點閱點閱:229
本文討論概分三部份。第一、探討「家庭政策」(Family Policy)的概念與其在台灣福利體系中展現的形式。第二、分析國家角色在上述政策領域的表現,檢視台灣的「家---國」關係,及其所持有的政策動機與意識型態;第三部份則以作者訪談相關政策制定者所得的資料,探討目前台灣在家庭政策制定上所面臨的兩難課題。本文主張,當女性單親家庭落入貧窮的現象日益明顯,貧窮女性化與家庭意識型態間的衝突本質也隨之浮現。不論是透過明顯的社會政策目標或是社會政策無意中造成的影響(unintended consequence) ,傳統的家庭意識型態對於家庭政策的制定有相當決定性的影響。在傳統的家庭意識型態脈絡下,國家對於家庭,家庭與個人關係的假設與定位,乃至其所提供的相關福利,不僅無法從根解決女性貧窮與經濟不安全的問題,更有透過此一傳統意識型態合理化婦女對於男性、家庭以及對國家福利的依賴之嫌。本文主張,目前以傳統家庭意識型態為主軸的家庭政策必須正視人口老化以及家庭結構多元化的需求變遷,揚棄對特定家庭型態的意識型態與道德偏好,才能真正看到家庭的需求與福祉之所在。
This paper firstly introduces the concept of family policy, identifying income support and social care as two of the most important policy fields which affect family well-being. Secondly, the paper looks at its current performance of family policy and the relationship between the family and the state in Taiwan. It goes on to examine the ideology behind family policy, arguing that the traditional Chinese family ideology is used as a convenient smokescreen by the state to rationalize the poor performance of family policy. The family policy furthermore reinforces women's dependency on the patriarchal structure, which favors one specific family type over others. The suggestions drawn from the interviews with social security officers indicate that indeed, there are dilemmas in the process of making family policy for the state to consider further. However, the existing policy for families is incompatible with present family needs, and this makes women more vulnerable to poverty.
期刊論文
1.朱雲鵬(19901100)。1980與1986年臺灣所得分配的因素分解分析。人文及社會科學集刊,3(1),145-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lister, R.(1990)。Women, economic dependency and citizenship。Journal of Social Policy,19(4),445-467。  new window
3.李安妮(19940400)。對傳統貧窮研究方法的省思:一個女性主義觀點。婦女與兩性學刊,5,165-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林鶴玲、李香潔(19991200)。臺灣閩、客、外省族群家庭中之性別資源配置。人文及社會科學集刊,11(4),475-528。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李安妮(19980600)。性別與貧窮--家庭內部資源分配的探討。人文及社會科學集刊,10(2),161-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.呂朝賢(19950400)。貧窮的性別與婚姻屬性差異。婦女與兩性學刊,6,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張清富(19920300)。貧窮變遷與家庭結構。婦女與兩性學刊,3,41-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Land, Hilary(1980)。The Family Wage。Feminist Review,6(1),55-77。  new window
9.Lewis, Jane(1992)。Gender and the development of welfare regimes。Journal of European social policy,2(3),159-173。  new window
10.陳正峰、王德睦、王仕圖、蔡勇美(19991200)。老人單身家戶、女性單親家戶與貧窮:嘉義縣低收入戶的貧窮歷程。人文及社會科學集刊,11(4),529-561。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.詹宜璋(1994)。臺灣地區老年經濟現況與家戶消費支出之分析。國立中正大學學報,5(1),1-26。  延伸查詢new window
12.古允文(1995)。The Development of State Welfare in the Asian NICs with Special Reference to Taiwan。Social Policy & Administration,29(4),345-364。  new window
13.許雅惠(1999)。書評:《私人生活與公共選擇-英國的單親與未來政策》。社會政策與社會工作學刊,3(2),235-243。  延伸查詢new window
14.Barbier, Jean-Claude(1990)。Comparing Family Policies in Europe: Methodological Problem。International Social Security Review,3/ 90,326-339。  new window
15.Bradshaw, J.(1996)。Family Policy and Family Poverty。Policy Studies,17(2),93-106。  new window
16.邱忠榮(1995)。臺灣地區歷年工作報酬分配與職業有偶婦女的邊際影響。人文及社會科學集刊,7(1),65-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Duncans, S.、Edwards, R.(1996)。Lone Mothers and Paid Work: Neighbourhood, Local Labour Markets and Welfare State Regimes。Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society,3,4-20。  new window
18.Fraser, N.、Gordon, L.(1994)。'Dependency' Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the Welfare State。Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society,1(1),4-31。  new window
19.Hartman, A.(1995)。Ideological Themes in Family Policy。Journal of Contemporary Human Services,76(3),182-192。  new window
20.Land, H.(1978)。Who Cares for the Family?。Journal of Social Policy,7(3),257-284。  new window
會議論文
1.嚴祥鸞(1995)。從社會學觀點論兩性工作平等制度。歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究學術研討會。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。141-155。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺北市政府社會局(1996)。傳統到現代-談「市民主義」時代的臺北都會區的貧窮社會工作展望。沒有紀錄。107-135。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王麗容(1996)。婦女二度就業需求與策略之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張齡友(1994)。父權體制下女性單親家庭致貧因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳仲豪(1995)。致貧因素與老人及非老人家戶貧窮之關係探究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.童小珠(1992)。臺灣省女性單親家庭經濟困境之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳妙盡(1996)。影響老年人居住安排因素之分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂朝賢(1998)。臺灣的貧窮問題(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃乃凡(1995)。台灣貧窮女性化的探討:女性戶長家戶貧窮現象之貫時性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sheu, Y. -H.(1998)。Women's Poverty in Taiwan: A Conflicting and Complementary Relationship with Family Policy,United Kingdom。  new window
圖書
1.Esping-Anderson, G.(1996)。Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies。London:Sage。  new window
2.Williams, Fiona(1989)。Social Policy: A Critical Introduction。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
3.Thornton, Arland、Lin, Hui-Sheng(1994)。Social Change and the Family in Taiwan。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Gauthier, A. H.(1996)。The State and the Family。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
5.Harding, L.(1996)。Family, State & Social Policy。London, UK:Macmillan。  new window
6.Pascall, G.(1986)。Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis。London:Tavistock。  new window
7.Giddens, Anthony(1999)。The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy。Polity Press。  new window
8.Ku, Yeun-wen(1997)。Welfare Capitalism in Taiwan: State, Economy and Social Policy。Macmillan Press。  new window
9.Lasch, Christopher(1977)。Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged。Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
10.Finch, Janet、Mason, Jennifer(1993)。Negotiating Family Responsibilities。Tavistock/Routledge。  new window
11.Folber, Nancy(1994)。Who pays for the kids?: gender and the structures of constraint。Routledge。  new window
12.張清富(1993)。臺灣省貧窮趨勢與致貧因素之研究。臺北市:豪峰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Pascall, Gillian(1997)。Social Policy: A New Feminist Analysis。London:Routledge。  new window
14.Zimmerman, S. L.(1988)。Understanding family policy: Theoretical approaches。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
15.王麗蓉(1995)。婦女與社會政策。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
16.Sainsbury, Diane(1996)。Gender, Equality, and Welfare States。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Wilson, E.(1982)。Women, the 'community' and the 'family'。Community Care: the Family, the State and Social Policy。沒有紀錄。  new window
19.Zimmerman, S. L.(1992)。Family Policies and Family WellBeing: The Role of Political Culture。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
20.Duncans, S.、Edwards, R.(1994)。Lone Mothers and Paid Work: State Policies, Social Discourse and Neighbourhood Processes。Lone Mothers and Paid Work: State Policies, Social Discourse and Neighbourhood Processes。沒有紀錄。  new window
21.Dye, T. R.(1999)。Understanding Public Policy。Understanding Public Policy。Taipei。  new window
22.Elliot, F. R.(1996)。Gender, Family & Society。Gender, Family & Society。London, UK。  new window
23.劉梅君、蔡青龍(1995)。婦女再就業之研究:職業訓練需求與就業適應。婦女再就業之研究:職業訓練需求與就業適應。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
24.Berger, P.、Berger, B.(1983)。The War over the Family。London:Hutchinson。  new window
25.Chester, R.(1994)。Flying without Instruments or Flight Plans: Family Policy in the United Kingdom。Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
26.Borchorst, A.、Siim, B.(1987)。Women and the Advanced Welfare State: a New Kind of Patriarchal Power。Women and the State: The Shifting Boundaries Between Public and Private。London, UK。  new window
27.Dominelli, L.(1991)。Women Across Continents - Feminist Comparative Social Policy。Women Across Continents - Feminist Comparative Social Policy。London, UK。  new window
28.Donzelot, J.(1980)。The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State。The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State。London, UK。  new window
29.(1994)。Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union。Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
30.Ford, R.、Millar, J.(1998)。Lone Parenthood in the UK: Policy Dilemmas and Solutions。Private Lives and Public Responses: Lone Parenthood and Future Policy in the UK。London, UK。  new window
31.Fraser, N.(1997)。After the Family Wage: A Post-industrial Thought Experiment。Crossing Borders: Gender and Citizenship in Transition。沒有紀錄。  new window
32.Garfinkel, I.、McLanahan, S.(1994)。Single-Mother Families, Economic Insecurity, and Government Policy。Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change。USA。  new window
33.Hobson, B.(1994)。Solo Mothers, Social Policy Regimes and Logics of Gender。Gendering Welfare State。London, UK。  new window
34.(1978)。Family Policy: Government and Families in 14 Countries。Family Policy: Government and Families in 14 Countries。NY。  new window
35.Land, H.、Lewis, J.(1997)。The Emergence of Lone Motherhood as a Problem in Late Twentieth Century Britain。The Emergence of Lone Motherhood as a Problem in Late Twentieth Century Britain。LSE。  new window
36.Lewis, J.(1991)。Women, Family, Work and the State since 1945。Women, Family, Work and the State since 1945。Oxford。  new window
37.Lister, R.(1997)。Dilemmas in Engendering Citizenship。Crossing Borders: Gender and Citizenship in Transition。沒有紀錄。  new window
38.Mahon, E.(1998)。Changing Gander Roles, State, Work and Family Lives。Women, Work and the Family in Europe。London, UK。  new window
39.Millar, J.(1996)。Poor Mothers and Absent Fathers: Support for Lone Parents in Comparative Perspective。The Politics of the Family。England。  new window
40.Millar, J.(1998)。Family Policy and Social Policy。The Student's Companion to Social Policy。Oxford。  new window
41.Millar, J.、Glendinning, C.(1992)。'It all Really Starts in the Family': Gender Divisions and Poverty。Women & Poverty in Britain the 1990s。London, UK。  new window
42.Moussourou, L. M.(1994)。Family Policy in Greece: Traditional and Modern Patterns。Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
43.Myrdal, A.(1968)。Nation and Family。Nation and Family。Cambridge, MA。  new window
44.Oakley, A.(1992)。Social Support and Motherhood。Social Support and Motherhood。Oxford。  new window
45.Pearce, D.(1990)。Welfare is not for Women。Women, the State and Welfare。Wisconsin。  new window
46.Pruzan, V.(1994)。Family Policy in Denmark: Towards Individuation and a Symmetrical Family Structure。Changing Family Policies in the Member States of the European Union。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
47.Rymsza, M.(1997)。Socio-Cultural and Ideological Aspects of the Evolution of Family Policies in Liberal Societies。Family Law and Family Policy in the New Europe。England。  new window
48.Ungerson, C.(1990)。The Language of Care。Gender and Caring。Hemel Hempstead, UK。  new window
49.Zimmerman, S. L.(1995)。Understanding Family Policy: Theories and Applications。London:Sage。  new window
其他
1.內政部(1990)。老人生活狀況調查報告,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(1999)。現行老人政策措施,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.胡幼慧(1997)。解讀臺灣長期照顧體系的神話 : 「家」與「國」的性別剖析與另類思考。女性、國家、照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周月清(1997)。殘障照顧與女性公民身分。女性、國家、照顧工作。台北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉梅君(1997)。建構性別敏感的公民權:從女性照顧工作本質之探析出發。女性國家照顧工作。台北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王淑英(1997)。台灣托育困境與國家角色。女性國家照顧工作。台北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.傅立葉(1995)。建構女人的福利國。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Patemen, Carole(1988)。The Patriarchal Welfare State。Democracy and the Welfare State。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.張晉芬、黃玟娟(19970000)。兩性分工觀念下婚育對女性就業的影響。女性、國家、照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉毓秀(1997)。女性、國家、公民身分:歐美模式、斯堪地那維亞模式與臺灣現況的比較。女性、國家、照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張晉芬(1996)。綿綿此恨,可有絕期?--女性工作困境之剖析。台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.呂寶靜、陳景寧(19970000)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。女性‧國家‧照顧工作。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林萬億(19950000)。論中國國民黨的社會福利觀。臺灣的社會福利:民間觀點。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉毓秀(1995)。男人的法律、男人的「國」「家」:「民法親屬篇」的意識型態分析。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北市:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE