朱子學術思想允為我國傳統思想之主幹。有清一代，諸儒輩出，一一皆以擁朱反朱為終始，並針對朱子之世界觀、人生觀以及知識論做出批判、繼承以及取捨。無論擁朱、反朱，清代學者藉著對朱子哲學的討論一方面豐富了朱子學的內涵，另一方面也開展出新的時代氣象。 本文擬以梁啟超《清代學術概論》中對清代學術之分期為據，以啟蒙期、全盛期、蛻分期、衰落期四階段分別詳論朱子學於清代之歷史處境及其發展。

Zhu Xi’s doctrine is central to traditional Chinese philosophy. In Qing Dynasty, there were many Confucians, who either supported or opposed Zhu Xi, criticizing, inheriting and selecting from Zhu Xi’s views of the world and life. Pro or con, these scholars enriched Zhu Xi’s doctrine through their discussion and launched a new era of Confucian scholarship. Liang qi-chao’s The Compendium of the Academic Scholarship in Qing Dynasty divided the academic scholarship in Qing Dynasty into four stages—the enlightenment, the heyday, the transformation and the decline. In this paper, we intend to discuss in details the historical situation and development of the Doctrine of Zhu Xi in Qing Dynasty.