:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐洲聯盟兩性工作平等法制之研究
書刊名:歐美研究
作者:焦興鎧
作者(外文):Chiao, Cing-kae
出版日期:2001
卷期:31:4
頁次:頁753-818
主題關鍵詞:歐洲聯盟女性就業狀況兩性工作平等就業上性別區隔就業上性別歧視European UnionFemale employment conditionsGender equality in employmentSex segregation in employmentSex discrimination in employment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(5)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:69
  • 點閱點閱:88
本文之目的,是要對歐洲聯盟過去四十幾年建構兩性工作平等法律制度之努力,做一整體說明,並評估其優劣得失,以及提出可供我國建構相同制度時參考之處。除緒論及結論外,全文共分六個部分:第一部分根據相關統計資料說明各會員國之女性就業狀況,並分析近年來女性大量投入勞動市場之現象及所產生之衝擊。第二部分說明早期歐洲聯盟建構兩性工作平等法制之情形。第三部分敘述該聯盟近期內推動兩性工作平等理念之努力。第四部分對歐洲聯盟兩性工作平等法制之未來發展趨勢做一說明。第五部分則是對其現制之優劣得失及引起爭議之處做一綜合評估。最後,本文列舉歐洲聯盟兩性工作平等法制中可供我國目前所制定「兩性工作平等法」參酌援引之處。
The purpose of this paper is to provide a complete review of the developments in gender equality in the employment system in the European Union (EU) over the past forty years. It also evaluates the merits and shortcomings of the EU employment system and sets forth several proposals for Taiwan as it tries to establish a similar system. In addition to the introductory and concluding remarks, the paper is divided into six sections. Section One describes female employment conditions in the member states and analyzes their impact. Section Two sets out the development of gender equality in employment system by the EU’s predecessors in the early stages. Sections Three and Four discuss the EU’s recent endeavors and future trends. Section Five provides a detailed assessment of the EU’s current practices, including their merits, shortcomings and controversial aspects. Finally, this paper outlines several lessons Taiwan can learn from the EU experience as it tries to enact a new Gender Equality in Employment Law.
期刊論文
1.焦興鎧(19990400)。美國法院對工所場所性騷擾判決之發展趨勢--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,28(3),29-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.(2000)。Commission's Anti-Discrimination Package。European Industrial Relations Review,312,13-17。  new window
3.Flynn, Leo(1999)。The Implications of Article 13 EC--After Amsterdam, Will Some Forms of Discrimination be More Equal Than Others?。Common Market Law Review,36,1127-1152。  new window
4.Goebel, Roger J.(1993)。Employee Rights in the European Community: A Panorama from the 1974 Social Action Program to the Social Charter of 1989。Hastings International and Comparative Law Review,17,1-95。  new window
5.McGlynn, Clare(2000)。Ideologies of Motherhood in European Community Sex Equality Law。European Law Journal,6(1),29-44。  new window
6.(2000)。Social Policy State of Play。European Industrial Relations Review,312,31-36。  new window
7.劉黃麗娟(19990400)。推動男女平等對待原則--歐洲聯盟的經驗。勞資關係,17(12)=204,26-38。  延伸查詢new window
8.焦興鎧(19990900)。工作場所性騷擾被害人在美國尋求救濟途徑之研究。歐美研究,29(3),1-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.焦興鎧(19990900)。對我國就業歧視問題之探討。月旦法學,52,103-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.焦興鎧(19990700)。私部門高階女性人力資源之開發及運用--美國「玻璃天花板委員會」報告初探。經社法制論叢,24,311-348。  延伸查詢new window
11.焦興鎧(20000200)。論國際組織對抗工作場所性騷擾之努力。東吳法律學報,12(1),123-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.焦興鎧(20000600)。國際勞動基準之最新發展趨勢--兼論對我國之影響。月旦法學,61,94-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.焦興鎧(19971200)。對部分時間工作者之法律保障--歐美國家之經驗。政大法學評論,58,285-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.焦興鎧(20000100)。同工同酬與同值同酬--美國之經驗。政大勞動學報,9,65-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.焦興鎧(20000400)。對我國建構兩性工作平等法制之省思。月旦法學,59,62-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.焦興鎧(2000)。兩性工作平等法制之國際趨勢-兼論對我國建構相同制度所能提供之啟示。經社法制論叢,25,203-229。  延伸查詢new window
17.Heide, Ingeborg(1999)。Supranational Action Against Sex Discrimination: Equal Pay and Equal Treatment in the European Union。International Labour Review,138(4),381-410。  new window
18.(1998)。Legislative Developments: Burden of Proof in Case of Sex Discrimination。Columbia Journal of European Law,5,153-157。  new window
19.Mancini, G. F.、O'Leary, S.(1999)。The New Frontiers of Sex Equality Law in the European Union。European Law Review,24,331-353。  new window
20.(1999)。European Union Directive on Parental Leave: Will the European Union Face the Same Problems as Those Faced by the United States under the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act?。Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal,17,229-269。  new window
21.Plantenga, Janneke、Hansen, Johan(1999)。Assessing Equal Opportunities in the European Union。International Labour Review,138,351-379。  new window
22.Stewart, Terence P.、Abellard, Delphine A.(1993)。Labor Laws and Social Policies in the European Community after 1992。Law and Policy in International Business,23,507-591。  new window
23.Watson, Philippa(1991)。The Community Social Charter。Common Market Law Review,28,37-68。  new window
圖書
1.焦興鎧(1997)。勞工法制之最新發展趨勢--美國勞工法論文集(二)。臺北:月旦。  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(1995)。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集。臺北:月旦出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭玲惠(1999)。男女工作平等:法理與判決之研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.中華民國勞資關係協進會(1997)。簡明勞動六法。簡明勞動六法。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺北市上班族協會(2000)。空服員勞動條件座談會。空服員勞動條件座談會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.李孟玢(1997)。論歐洲共同體條約之男女同工同酬原則。歐洲聯盟:理論與政策。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.林明鏘(1996)。德國公務員之兩性工作平等制度-兼論我國公務員兩性工作平等政策制度及其執行。歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.焦興鎧(2001)。向工作場所性騷擾宣戰-工業先進國家之經驗。向工作場所性騷擾宣戰-工業先進國家之經驗。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊瑩(1996)。瑞典的兩性工作平等制度。歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.Commission of the European Communities(2000)。Joint Employment Report。Joint Employment Report。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
11.Commission of the European Communities(2000)。Equal Opportunities for Men and Women in European Union - 1999。Equal Opportunities for Men and Women in European Union - 1999。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
12.Collins, Helen(1992)。The Equal Opportunities Handbook: A Guide to Law & Best Practice in Europe。The Equal Opportunities Handbook: A Guide to Law & Best Practice in Europe。Oxford, UK。  new window
13.Ellis, Evelyn(1998)。EC Sex Equality Law。EC Sex Equality Law。Oxford。  new window
14.European Commission(2000)。Employment in Europe 2000。Employment in Europe 2000。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
15.International Labour Organization(1992)。International Conventions and Recommendations: 1919-1991。International Conventions and Recommendations: 1919-1991。Geneva, Switzerland。  new window
圖書論文
1.焦興鎧(19980000)。歐洲聯盟勞工政策之研究--以防制工作場所性騷擾之規範為例。歐洲聯盟 : 理論與政策。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王玉葉(1998)。美國最高法院處理優惠待遇(Affirmative Action)案件之新趨勢:Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña案例之評析。美國最高法院重要判決之研究:一九九三--一九九五。中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE