:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由相互授能觀點分析我國公益彩券決策過程
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:陳恆鈞
作者(外文):Chen, Hen-chin
出版日期:2002
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁115-138
主題關鍵詞:相互授能公益彩券國家機關公民社會社會資本Mutual empowermentNon-profit lotteryStateCivil societySocial capital
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:295
  • 點閱點閱:37
隨著公私部門合作情形的增加,兩者之間的分際逐漸模糊。事實上,國家機關在進行政策選擇時,必須經由不同的管道,在機關內部以及公民社會團體之間,就各種議題進行溝通協調,取得政策共識。然而,在公益彩券決策過程中,由於國家機關與社會團體未能建立相互授能關係,致使公益彩券發行後,並未達到當初預期的政策結果。基此,本文試圖運用相互授能的觀點,來分析我國公益彩券之發行。本文認為國家機關倘能經由授能,在機關內部以及公民社會團體間形成一個相互依賴的網絡,將可建立合作共榮的互惠關係。
With the increasing of public-private cooperation, the boundaries between two parts had blurred. When choosing policy, the state not only needs to coordinate within the bureaucracy, but also to communicate with the civil society via different channels. However, since the state and civil society cannot establish the concept of mutual empowerment, the non-profit lottery did not carry out the intended results. Applying the concept of mutual empowerment, this paper suggests if the state and civil society can establish an interdependent policy network.
期刊論文
1.Centeno, M. A.(1994)。Between Rocky Democracies and Hard Markets: Dilemmas of the Double Transition。Annual Review of Sociology,20,125-147。  new window
2.林水波(20010800)。員工入股組織的管理。人事月刊,33(2)=192,33-41。  延伸查詢new window
3.Mandell, Myma P.(1999)。The Impact of Collaborative Efforts: Changing the Face of Public Policy Through Networks and Network Structures。Policy Study Review,16(1),4-17。  new window
4.Montgomery, J. D.(2000)。Social Capital as a Policy Resource。Policy Sciences,33,227-243。  new window
5.Putnam, R. D.(1993)。The prosperous community: Social capitaland public life。The American Prospect,13,1-11。  new window
6.林岩哲(19960600)。評析美國賭博事業。美歐月刊,11(6)=122,142-157。  延伸查詢new window
7.Leana, C. R.、Van Burren, H. J. III(1999)。Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices。Academy of Management Review,24(3),538-555。  new window
8.Gulati, Ranjay、Singh, Harbir(1998)。The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances。Administrative Science Quarterly,43(4),781-814。  new window
9.Inkeles, A.(2000)。Measuring Social Capital and Its Consequences。Policy Sciences,33,245-268。  new window
10.Kernaghan, K.(1992)。Empowerment and Public Administration: Revolutional Advance or Passing Fancy?。Canadian Public Administration,35,194-214。  new window
11.王榮璋(2000)。公益彩券的公義在哪裡。厚生雜誌,9,42-43。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉錦添、鄒孟文(1991)。誰是彩券發行的贏家-從美國各州彩券發行談起。臺灣經濟金融月刊,14(1),101-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林財源、趙日彰、張宮熊(2000)。臺灣公益彩券發行現況與未來發展之探討。臺灣經濟金融月刊,36(9),72-87。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1990)。「大家樂」問題成因及防治途徑專案委託研究報告。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.羊憶蓉(1990)。「大家樂」問題成因及防治途徑專案委託研究報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Baratz, M. S.、Bachrach, Peter(1970)。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.張玉芹、馬建群(1999)。公益彩券戰爭--謝長廷為何而戰。台北:月旦。  延伸查詢new window
3.Weber, Max、Parsons, Talcott、Henderson, A. M.(1964)。The Theory of Social and Economic Organization。New York:The Free Press。  new window
4.吳英明(1995)。公私部門協力關係之研究--兼論公私部門聯合開發與都市發展。復文圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cohen, Jean L.、Arato, Andrew(1992)。Civil Society and Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
6.Clarke, M.、Stewart, J.(1992)。Empowerment: A Theme for the 1990s。London:Local Government Management Board。  new window
7.張茂桂(19940000)。社會運動與政治轉化。臺北:業強。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林水波(1999)。公共政策新論。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.林水波(1999)。政府再造。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Skocpol, Theda(1979)。States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Olson, Mancur Jr.(1982)。The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
12.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
13.劉代洋(1996)。博彩事業管制與稅制規劃。博彩事業管制與稅制規劃。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.丘昌泰(2000)。民主化對國家競爭力的挑戰:臺灣經驗的反省。民主轉型與經濟衝突:九0年代臺灣經濟發展的困境與挑戰。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭全政(1991)。臺灣地區的新重商主義。臺北:國家政策研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.朱雲漢(2000)。九0年代民主轉型期經濟政策制定的效率與公平性。民主轉型與經濟衝突。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Social-political Governance: Introduction。Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions。London:Sage Publication。  new window
3.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity。Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions。Sage。  new window
4.Linder, S. H.、Peters, B. G.(1995)。The Two Traditions of Institutional Designing: Dialogue Versus Decision?。Institutional Design。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
5.Ostrom, E.(1997)。Crossing the Great Divided: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development。State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development。Berkeley:University of California。  new window
6.Parsons, T.(1986)。Power and Social System。Power。New York, NY:New York University Press。  new window
7.蕭全政(2000)。民主化對政府經濟和社會職能的挑戰與因應。民主轉型與經濟衝突。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Kohli, Atul、Shue, Vivienne(1994)。State Power and Social Forces: On Political Contention and Accommodation in the Third World。State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE