:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣家產制度的演變
書刊名:思與言
作者:曾文亮 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Aliang
出版日期:2002
卷期:40:1
頁次:頁249-327
主題關鍵詞:個人財產制家產家產制度財產繼承父親個人財產Principle personal propertyFamily propertyFamily property systemFamily property successionFather's personal property
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:210
  • 點閱點閱:65
     臺灣現行民法上的財產繼承是建立在「個人財產制」之上,也就是說,財產貨屬於個人,個人死後,發生財產繼承之效果;是在人民日常生活中,仍然存有「家產」的觀念。有主要目的在釐清這種「家產」觀念在臺灣社會的形成過程。研究結果顯示,「家產」觀念源於清治時期的「家產制度」,以「家」做為財產的歸屬單元,並由家中男性最尊長代表「家」進行家產管理。當時尚無現行民法上的「財產繼承」概念,家產是透過「分家」的方式均分給新一世代的家。1895年臺灣成為日本的殖民地後,開始透日本法繼受近代歐陸民法,雖然保存了傳統的「家產」觀念,但是在意義上開始出現變化。例如,只有個人才是財產權主體,因此家產屬於家父長個人所有;日治晚期則偏向日本民法規定,以戶主為家產所有人。現代民法上的「財產繼承制度」也首次被引進臺灣社會。1945年,中華民取代日本成為臺灣統治者,根據中華民國法體制,財產也是屬於個人所有,同時也有財產繼承制度,但是並無「家產」之概念。但是這不意謂著「家產」觀念完全從臺灣社會消失,毋寧,「家產」只是不再屬於實定法的概念而已,但是仍然存在於一般人的生活中。,在繼受西方法一個世紀後的今日,「家產」這樣的概念仍然存在於臺灣社會,圖是在意義上,除了傳統上以「家」為歸屬的觀念外,也有受到現行民法影響而有「父親個人財產」或「家長個人財產」這樣的意思。
Taiwan's active succession law is based on the principle of "personal property". That is, property belongs to some "person", and a "property succession" opens with his death; but still there is a conception of "family property" in Taiwanese daily life. This article is to deal with the forming and changing process of the conception. As the conclusion suggests, the conception of "family property" can be traced back to Ch'ing period, when there was a "family property system", under which the unit the property belongs to is "a family", governed by the elders and betters. There was no modem conception of "property succession", too. The family property was equally divided up according to the numbers of new-generation family. In 1895, Taiwan became Japan's colony, and, through Japanese law system, started indirectly to recept western (European) civil law. During this period, the traditional conception of "family property" was retained, but took on a different meaning. For example, under Japanese law system, the property can only belongs to a "person", so the "family property, "no longer means "the property belongs to a family", but "the property, belongs to a patriarch", and later a step closer to Japanese civil law, to a "house head". The modern "property succession system" was also introduced to Taiwanese for the first time. In 1945, the ROC government took the place of Japanese one as Taiwan's new ruler, and under whose law system, there is a principle of "personal property", and a "property succession system", too, but no such conception as "family property " This, however, doesn't mean the conception of "family property " is vanished from Taiwanese society forever, but rather, it only suggests that the conception is no longer a legal conception, but it still exists in Taiwanese daily life. And now, after reception of western civil law over a century in Taiwan, "family property" has been, in addition to its traditional understanding as "property belongs to a family", added some new senses as "father's personal property" or "patriarch's personal property".
期刊論文
1.岡松參太郎(1901)。親屬繼承。臺灣慣習記事,1下(8),56。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺中地方舊慣諮問會筆記。臺灣慣習記事,4下(7),14。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴炎輝(1962)。清代臺灣之家產及家產。臺灣文獻,14(3),10。  延伸查詢new window
4.舊慣問答筆錄:關於遺產繼承之件。臺灣慣習記事,1卷下(10),156。  延伸查詢new window
5.上內恆三郎(1992)。中國法系之法制及慣習所認定之財產制。臺灣慣習記事,6(1),1。  延伸查詢new window
6.問答:本島財鬮分的舊慣如何?。臺灣慣習記事,4卷下(11),204。  延伸查詢new window
7.問答:關於繼承案。臺灣慣習記事,1(1),65。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.戴東雄(1988)。論中國家制的現代化。臺北。565。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台灣總督官房法務課員(1931)。民法對照臺灣人事公業慣習研究。臺北:臺法月報發行所。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴炎輝(1984)。臺灣民事習慣調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.臨時臺灣舊慣調查會、陳金田(1993)。臺灣私法。臺灣省文獻會。  延伸查詢new window
4.手島兵次郞(1913)。台灣慣習大要。台北:台法月報發行所。  延伸查詢new window
5.滋賀秀三(1981)。中國家族法の原理。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡長清(1964)。中國民法繼承論。台北市:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.薛允升、黃靜嘉(1970)。讀例存疑。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃富三(1987)。霧峰林家的興起:從渡海拓荒到封疆大吏(1729-1864)。臺北:自立晚報社文化出版部。  延伸查詢new window
9.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1961)。臺灣私法人事編。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
10.王泰升(19990000)。臺灣日治時期的法律改革。臺北:聯經出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林峰正(2000)。和氣分家產─繼承與贈與的法律智慧。和氣分家產─繼承與贈與的法律智慧。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)薛允升。讀例存疑重刊本(4)。讀例存疑重刊本(4)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.姊齒松平(1938)。本島人???關??親族法並相續法?大要。本島人???關??親族法並相續法?大要。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.臺灣總督府(1918)。臺灣法令輯覽。臺灣法令輯覽。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會(1912)。臺灣親族相續令第二草案。臺灣親族相續令第二草案。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(1)。覆審,高等法院判例(1)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
17.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(12)。覆審,高等法院判例(12)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
18.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(3)。覆審,高等法院判例(3)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
19.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(10)。覆審,高等法院判例(10)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
20.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(8)。覆審,高等法院判例(8)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
21.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(2)。覆審,高等法院判例(2)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
22.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(6)。覆審,高等法院判例(6)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
23.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(7)。覆審,高等法院判例(7)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
24.小森惠(1995)。覆審,高等法院判例(5)。覆審,高等法院判例(5)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
25.潘維和(1982)。中國近代民法史(上)。中國近代民法史(上)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.潘維和(1982)。中國近代民法史(下)。中國近代民法史(下)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.司法院解釋彙編委員會(1989)。司法院解釋彙編(2)。司法院解釋彙編(2)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.羅鼎(1946)。民法繼承論。民法繼承論。上海。  延伸查詢new window
29.蔡墩銘(1983)。民法立法理由、令函解釋、判解決議、實務問題彙編。民法立法理由、令函解釋、判解決議、實務問題彙編。臺。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.俞廉三,劉若曾。民律前三編草案告成奏析。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.寺田浩明、王亞新(1998)。權利與冤抑:清代聽訟和民眾的民事法秩序。明清時期的民事審判與民間契約。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE