:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論析美國加州San Bernardino學區教師評鑑的特色
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:吳和堂 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Ho-tang
出版日期:2002
卷期:18
頁次:頁113-134
主題關鍵詞:教師評鑑評鑑目的評鑑規準Teacher evaluationEvaluation purposeEvaluation criteria
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:72
本文透過晤談及文件分析法,以探討美國加州San Bernardino 學區教師評鑑的特色,作為高雄市實施教師評鑑的參考。經分析後,該學區的教師評鑑特色為:依法實施、教師協會參與評鑑原則的訂定、偏重形成性評鑑目的、評鑑規準可調整、輔導計畫周全、流程與時程明確、實施有彈性、尊重被評鑑者等八項。 依據San Bernardino學區教師評鑑實施特色,建議有六:教師評鑑實施辦法由市議會立法通過,或教師聘書上應列有接受評鑑的條款;在修改評鑑原則與規準時,應邀請教師會參與;評鑑規準一定要評鑑者與被評鑑者彼此協商後才實施,以符合班級或教師個人情況與需求;應設計輔導計劃,以輔導少數獲得令人不滿意評鑑等級的教師;評鑑時程要更明確;設計變通計劃,使教師評鑑實施更有彈性。
The goal of this study is to analyze the Characteristics of Teacher Evaluation at San Bernardino School District, California, USA. And these characteristics could be an example for Kaohsiung City. After interviews and document analysis, characteristics come to the following:1. Teacher evaluation has its basis of law. 2.Teachers Association is invited to develop evaluation criteria. 3. The school district put emphasis on formal purpose, rather than on summative one. 4. Evaluation criteria is adjustable. 5. The comprehensive supportive and assistant program is prepared. 6. Evaluation procedure is definite. 7. Flexibility is shown in evaluation process. 8. Evaluatees receive the respect in the process of evaluation. Based on characteristics above, suggestions are offered:1. The programs of Teacher evaluation should be voted by Kaohsiung City Council, or the article of teacher evaluation should be stated in the teacher agreement. 2. Teachers Association should involve in adjusting teacher criteria. 3. Teacher criteria should be discussed by the evaluator and the evaluatee, in order to meet needs of the class or teacher. 4. The supportive and assistant program should be designed to guide teachers who get the unsatisfactory rating. 5. The timeline of evaluation should be more definite. 6. The alternative program should be planned, that could makes the practice of teacher evaluation more flexible.
期刊論文
1.Stronge, J. H.(1995)。Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: A conceptual framework。Studies in Educational Evaluation,21,131-151。  new window
2.張德銳、呂木琳(19930600)。教師評鑑的新方向--教師發展評鑑系統。國立編譯館館刊,22(1),269-303。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾憲政(199706)。國民教育的困境與生機。研考雙月刊,21(3)=199,16-23。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rowley, G. L.(1978)。The relationship of reliability in classroom research to the amount of observation: An extension of the Spearman-Brown formula。Journal of Educational Measurement,15(3),165-180。  new window
會議論文
1.吳和堂、李清良(2001)。高雄市國小實施教師評鑑之研究:以一所國小為例。新竹師範學院第八次教育行政論壇。新竹:國立新竹師範學院初等教育學系。349-360。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stronge, J. H.(1997)。Improving school through teacher evaluation。Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
2.Airasian, P. W.、Gullickson, A. R.(1997)。Teacher self-evaluation tool kit。Kalamazoo, MI:Western Michigan University。  new window
3.Beach, Don M.、Reinhartz, J.(1989)。Supervision: Focus on Instruction。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
4.Seyfarth, J. T.(1991)。Personnel management for effective school。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Doyle, K. O.(1983)。Evaluating Teaching。DC:Heath and Company。  new window
6.Borich, G. D.(1994)。Observation skills for effective teaching。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
7.McGreal, Thomas L.(1983)。Successful teacher evaluation。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
8.Sykes, G.(1990)。Licensure and certification of teachers: An appraisal。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。CA。  new window
9.(1985)。The International Encyclopedia of Education。The International Encyclopedia of Education。Oxford, UK。  new window
10.Bacharach, S. B.、Conley, S. C.、Shedd, J. B.(1981)。Teacher self-assessment: A means for improving classroom instruction。Teacher self-assessment: A means for improving classroom instruction。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Bridges, E. M.(1990)。Evaluation for tenure and dismissal。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。CA。  new window
12.Haney, W.(1990)。Preservice evaluation of teachers。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。CA。  new window
其他
1.Sclan, E. M.(1994)。Performance evaluation for experienced teachers: an overview of state policies,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.McLaughlin, M. W.(1990)。Embracing Contraries: implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。Sage。  new window
2.Scriven, M.(1990)。Teacher selection。The new handbook of teacher evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Holdzkom, D.,、Brandt, R. M.(1995)。From accountability to professional empowerment in North Carolina。Teacher evaluation policy- from accountability to professional development。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
4.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
5.Stodolsky, S. S.(1990)。Classroom observation。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publication。  new window
6.Duke, D. L.、Stiggins, R. J.(1990)。Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation--Assessing elementary and。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Manatt, R. P.(1988)。Teacher performance evaluation: A total system approach。Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success。Los Osos, CA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
8.Peterson, K. D.(1990)。Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
9.Natriello, G.(1990)。Intended and unintended consequences: Purposes and effects of teacher evaluation。The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School teachers。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE