:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學教師績效評鑑模型之應用及探討--以一所大學為例
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:陳芃婷 引用關係李宗耀 引用關係虞孝成 引用關係曾國雄
作者(外文):Chen, Peng-tingLee, Zon-yauYu, Hsiao-chengTzeng, Gwo-hashiung
出版日期:2003
卷期:49:4
頁次:頁191-218
主題關鍵詞:大學教師升等教師評鑑灰關聯數據前處理VIKORCollegeTeacher's promotionTeacher's achievement evaluationFuzzy related data pretreatment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:33
任何大學教師評鑑模型除了具有完備理論基礎,還必需具有應用性,由於大學教師的績效評量,若是採不同的評量標準,會加深評量體系的複雜性與執行的困難度,所以本研究的目的基於已建立的模型進行實證應用分析及探討,以管理學院「教師升等」為範例,結合灰關聯數據前處理及VIKOR法進行實證範例分析,以突顯此模型具有創新性、學術性及實務性的三重價值。故各教學單位(系所)教師績效評鑑可參考此模型之構面及準則,但權重應依各系所或學院的特性及需求而有所不同,才能符合教師績效評鑑的多元性及完整性。類似評鑑或是評估類的問題可利用灰關聯數據前處理及VIKOR法來解決評鑑準則具有不同計算單位的問題,會得到較真實性的結果及較佳的分析品質。
Any college teacher’s achievement evaluation model should have a clear theoretical ba­sis as well as being easily applicable. In view of the fact that using different criteria to evaluate college teachers’ achievements will increase the complexity and thus reduce the applicability of an evaluation system, this study subjected the model adopted for teacher promotion by the management school of a national university to empirical analysis and exploration. Fuzzy Related Data Pretreatment and the VIKOR method were applied here, and the innovative, theoretical, and practical value of this model was verified. It was con­cluded that every teaching unit in Taiwan can take this model as a reference, but each depart­ment, school, or college would need to decide the relative weight of each criterion according to its own characteristics and needs, thereby promoting the diversification and completeness of teacher’s achievement evaluation. In order to achieve a higher analytic quality, it is suggested that Fuzzy Related Data Pretreatment and the VIKOR method can be em­ployed in similar cases to resolve the problems caused by different counting units.
期刊論文
1.吳政達(20010400)。教師評鑑方法之探討。教育研究,84,85-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Scriven, M.(1995)。A Unified Theory Approach to Teacher Evaluation。Studies in Educational Evaluation,21,111-129。  new window
3.鄭英耀、王文中、楊淑晴、葉玉珠(20000600)。國立中山大學管理學院教學績效評量制度之研究。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,2(2),125-159。  延伸查詢new window
4.Loup, K. S.、Garland, J. S.、Ellett, C. D.、Rugutt, J. K.(1996)。Ten years later: Findings from a republication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,10(3),203-226。  new window
5.Opricovic, S.、Tzeng, G. H.(2002)。Multicriteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction。Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,17(3),211-220。  new window
6.吳和堂(20020600)。論析美國加州San Bernardino學區教師評鑑的特色。教育學刊,18,113-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Holdzkhom, David(1987)。Appraising teacher performance in North Carolina。Educational Leadership,44(7),40-44。  new window
8.陳聖謨(19980600)。美國教師評鑑制度的發展及其對我國的啟示。教育研究(高師),6,175-189。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳璧如(2000)。教師效能感之內涵分析。研習資訊,17(5),57-66。  延伸查詢new window
10.Darling-Hammond, L.、Wise, A. E.、Pease, S. R.(1983)。Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature。Review of Educational Research,53(3),285-328。  new window
11.Deemer, S. A.、Minke, K. M.(1999)。An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale。Journal of Educational Research,93(1),3-10。  new window
12.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Dembo, Myron H.、Gibson, Sherri(1985)。Teachers' Sense of Efficacy: An Important Factor in School Improvement。The Elementary School Journal,86(2),173-184。  new window
14.Guskey, Thomas R.(1988)。Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation。Teaching & Teacher education,4(1),63-69。  new window
15.Gibson, Sherri D.、Dembo, Myron H.(1984)。Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation。Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582。  new window
16.夏郭賢、吳漢雄(19980300)。灰關聯分析之線性數據前處理探討。灰色系統學刊,1(1),47-53。  延伸查詢new window
17.Guskey, T. R.(1981)。Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom。Journal of Teacher Education,32(3),44-51。  new window
18.吳政達(20010300)。教師評鑑方法之探討。教育研究月刊,83,107-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.王國明、顧志遠(19941000)。績效奬勵制度建立之理論與實務--以元智工學院教師績效奬勵制度為例。研考雙月刊,18(5)=183,32-41。  延伸查詢new window
20.Woolfolk, Anita E.、Hoy, Wayne K.(1990)。Prospective Teachers' Sense of Efficacy and Beliefs about Control。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),81-91。  new window
21.Chapman, D. W.、Hutcheson, S. M.(1982)。Attrition from Teacher Careers: A Discriminant Analysis。American Educational Research Journal,19,93-106。  new window
學位論文
1.Opricovic, S.(1998)。Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems(博士論文)。Faculty of Civil Engineering University of Belgrade,Belgrade。  new window
圖書
1.Harris, B. M.、Hill, J.(1982)。The DeTEK。The DeTEK。Austin, TX。  new window
其他
1.李宗耀,陳芃婷,陳永順,虞孝成(2003)。大學教師績效評鑑模型建立及分析-以新竹某國立大學為例,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.高強華(1995)。論提昇教師專業成長的「教師評鑑」。教育評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE