:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建立政府災難管理職能:社會資本論分析
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:廖坤榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Kun-jung
出版日期:2002
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:政府典範治理典範社會資本信任規範社會網絡災難管理社會網絡Government paradigmGovernance paradigmSocial capitalTrustNormsSocial networksDisaster management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:49
九二一震災已時過境遷,三三一地震災難又到來,留下給台灣全體社會的並非僅是一個夢魘,而是「災難管理」(disaster management)研究的開始,本論文根據「治理理論」(governance theory ) 與「社會資本論」(social capital perspective)探討政府在九三一救災、賑災與重建工程中所面臨之困境,並從理論層次提出如何提升政府「從難管理」之職能。本文提出一理論性主張,即災難管理是政府一項極為複雜與特殊之公共服務回應 (public service delivery),治理理論指出政府官僚應揚棄傳統政府支配與主導性的公共行政模式,並應進入「治理典範」模型。所謂「治理典範」就是政府應與「公民社會」(civil society )合作,並形成一「伙伴關係」( partnership),以提升政府災難管理的職能,尤其政府應積極為公民社會開創參與「災難管理」的機制,以改進民主的公共行政所面臨的民主與效率衝突的問題。本文以「災難管理」為例,結合「社會資本」(social capital) 理論所強調的信任 ( trust )、規範 (norms ) 與社會網絡 (social networks) 等要素,探討政府應如何運用並轉化社會資本,便成為政府可用之公共服務資源,最重要的是提升災難管理職能的「時效」性。 「社會資本論」指出民間社會擁有無窮之資源,其中以公益與慈善團體所能動員的物質與勞務、組織網絡、工作承諾、人道關懷、捐獻等,最為獨特,這些資源是公共組織所缺乏的,政府應建立制度,系統性地開拓並利用蘊藏在非政府部門的「社會資本」,以提昇政府「災難管理」之職能。從台灣過去所面臨的各種天然災難為例,尤其以九二一震災經驗,顯示政府並非萬能,救災與乃至於脹災都需民間社會的參與投入,方能即時、有殼的解除社會所遭遇的災費苦楚,從「災難管理」案例分析,本文提出的理論性主張,為提升政府公共服務職能,公共行政科學研究應從「政府」典範進入「治理」典範。
This paper, based on governance theory and social capital perspective, investigates the implementation difficulties and dilemma of 921 earquake disaster relief and reconstruction project. The paper also proposes a crucial theoretical argument of how to upgrade emergence management capability in dealing various disasters. Actually, emergency management is a complicate and difficult public service delivery for any public authority. It is improper to look for disaster relief strategy from traditional public administration. Efficient and effective emergency management should be based on newly emerging governance model which emphasizes the cooperation between the government and civil society since the private sector has large potential resources to be used in disaster relief and recovery program implemented by government. Generally, disaster relief is urgent and time-pressured public service. Governments with traditional hierarchical organizational control system are usually ineffective in dealing compelling disaster relief. Social capital approach, characterized with three key elements of trust, norms, and social networks, points out that there are potential resources, including humanitarianism, trust, donation, and organizational networks which could be mobilized to improve government performance in general and upgrade emergency managerial capability in particular. The government should figure out an institution setting to effectively create and mobilize social capital to improve government's emergency management capability. According to this bitter 912 earthquake disaster experienced by Taiwan's government and society, this paper emphasizes that facing new-millennium public administration, we should move from "government paradigm" into "governance paradigm".
期刊論文
1.Levi, M.(1996)。Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work。Politics & Society,24,45-55。  new window
2.Putnam, R. D.(1993)。The prosperous community: Social capitaland public life。The American Prospect,13,1-11。  new window
3.史美強、蔡武軒(20001200)。網絡社會與治理概念初探。中國行政評論,10(1),33-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Newton, Kenneth(1997)。Social Capital and Democracy。American Behavioral Scientist,40(5),575-586。  new window
5.楊永年(20000600)。建構地方政府救災組織體系之理論與實際--以921大地震之南投縣政府為案例研究。社會文化學報,10,61-83。  延伸查詢new window
6.Putnam, Robert D.(1995)。Bowling Alone: American's Declining Social Capital。Journal of Democracy,6(1),65-78。  new window
7.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
8.Kenworthy, Lane(1997)。Civic Engagement, Social Capital, and Economic Cooperation。American Behavioral Scientist,40(5),645-656。  new window
9.全鍾燮(1999)。Enhancing Local Governance and Civil Society in the New Millennium。Administrative Theory & Praxis,21(4),461-467。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭讚源(2000)。既公又私,不公不私?凗非營利部門的特性談非營利組織管理的發展方向。沒有紀錄。4.1-4.17。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊永年(2000)。建立以地方政府為主體之救災組織體系:以九二一地震與八掌溪兩案比較。沒有紀錄。2.3.1-2.3.22。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.宋興洲、傅正彥(2000)。震災重建與各級政府之運作:南投個案研究。沒有紀錄。2.1.1-2.1.30。  延伸查詢new window
4.丘昌泰(2000)。剖析九二一災後重建的問題糾葛與解決之道。南投縣埔里鎮。1.1.1-1.1.24。  延伸查詢new window
5.江大樹(2000)。從府際關係檢討震災重建的政策缺失。南投縣埔里鎮。1.3.1-1.3.14。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳寧遠(2000)。宗教性非營利組織使命與志工組織承諾之研究:以高雄市生命線與女青年會為例。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Misztal, B. A.(1996)。Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order。Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers Inc。  new window
2.江大樹、廖俊松(2001)。府際關係與震災重建。臺北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Inglehard, R.(1990)。Culture Shift。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Fukuyama, F.(1995)。Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity。New York:Free Press。  new window
5.Clarke, John、Newman, Janet E.(1997)。The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare。London:Sage。  new window
6.丘昌泰(2000)。災難管理學:地震篇。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Etzioni, Amitai(1988)。The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics。New York:London:Free Press:Collier Macmillan。  new window
8.Inglehart, Ronald(1997)。Modernization and Postmodernization: Culture, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Peters, B. Guy(1996)。The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models。University Press of Kansas。  new window
10.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(1997)。Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability。Open University Press。  new window
11.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of social Theory。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
13.(1999)。Modern Governance: New Government and Society Interaction。Modern Governance: New Government and Society Interaction。London, UK。  new window
14.內政部(2000)。九二一地震救災重建專案報告。九二一地震救災重建專案報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.(2000)。921震災摘捐款監督報告書。921震災摘捐款監督報告書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃啟禎(2001)。天然災害社會救助措施合法性之探討:以九二一大地震為例。府際關係與賑災重建。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.江岷欽(1999)。組織分析。組織分析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.臺中縣政府(2000)。臺中縣政府九二一震災重建工作簡報。臺中縣政府九二一震災重建工作簡報。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
19.大里市(2000)。臺中縣大里市921震災受損情形、災後重建綱要計畫簡報資料。臺中縣大里市921震災受損情形、災後重建綱要計畫簡報資料。臺中縣大里市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE