:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:現代休閒活動參與之社會學分析
書刊名:臺東師院學報
作者:蘇維杉 引用關係
作者(外文):Su, We-shan
出版日期:2002
卷期:13(下)
頁次:頁77-106
主題關鍵詞:休閒社會學理論LeisureSociological theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:295
  • 點閱點閱:85
從社會學的觀點來看休閒,社會學的分析不在於把休閒分門別類的陳述遊憩、運動、遊戲或觀光等一般被認為是與休閒有關的行為,而是透過相關社會學理論的探討,期望能理解休閒活動參與的理論基礎與架構,研究同時也探討影響休閒活動參與的當代社會議題,發現休閒參與行為的產生,是一種不斷修正的社會結構歷程,其內容除了個人參與的動機及其預期的效益外,也是個體和社會結構互動所產生的結果,這是一個社會化和連續性的結構歷程。基本上休閒本身就是一種複雜的現象,而且也是日常生活現象的組合,因此研究休閒並無法用單一的理論模式或方法來理解,而是必須透過全面性的探索,才能理解其內部構成要素。影響休閒參與的社會要素就如同休閒本身同樣的複雜,在當代的社會現象中則是以社會階層、生活風格和社會變遷這三個議題影響最大。
From the perspective of sociology, the analysis is not to expound behavior of leisure activities such as recreation, sports, games, sightseeing, etc. by classifying it, but to understand its theoretical basis and structure. Meanwhile, the research discusses issues of society today, which influence the participation of leisure activity. Moreover, it shows that the participation behavior of leisure activity is a process, which amends societal structure constantly, and its content is a result of interaction between individual and societal structure, besides the individual participation motives and its expected profits. Therefore, it is a socialized and continuous constructive process. Basically, leisure activity itself is a complicated phenomenon, and also a combination of daily life. Hence, a simplex theory or method can’t define it thoroughly. But through a complete research, we can figure out the essential factor of its interior structure. Also, the social factors, which influence the participation of leisure activity, are as complicated as leisure activity itself. And according to the societal phenomenon today, the issues of social stratum, life style, and social change influence most.
期刊論文
1.孫治本(20011000)。社會階級的終結--水平式不平等、社會不平等的個人主義化。國立政治大學社會學報,31,1-43。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kelly, J. R.(1974)。Socialization toward leisure: A developmental approach。Journal of Leisure Research,6,181-193。  new window
3.劉維公(19990900)。布爾迪厄與生活風格社會學研究:兼論現代社會中的社會學危機。社會理論學報,2(2),347-374。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Pred, Allan(1983)。Structuration and Place: On the Becoming of Sense of Place and Structure of Feeling。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,13(1),45-68。  new window
5.Fischer, Claude S.(1976)。Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism。American Journal of Sociology,80(6),1319-1340。  new window
6.Honneth, Axel、劉維公(19920900)。片斷化的象徵世界--波迪爾文化社會學的省思。當代,77,14-31。  延伸查詢new window
7.高宣揚(19910900)。論布爾迪厄的「生存心態」概念。思與言,29(3),21-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Frank, L. K.(1962)。Trends in American living and outdoor recreation: reports to the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission。Washington, DC:Government Printing Office。  new window
圖書
1.Hamilton, Peter(1974)。Knowledge and Social Structure: An Introduction to the Classical Argument in the Sociology of Knowledge。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
2.Stebbins, R. A.(1979)。Amateurs: On the Margin between Work and Leisure。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publication。  new window
3.Kelly, J. R.、王昭正(2001)。休閒導論。臺北:品度。  延伸查詢new window
4.Veblen, T.(1899)。The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions。Macmillan。  new window
5.Giddens, A.(1981)。A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism。The Macmillan Press Ltd.。  new window
6.Nixon, Howard L. II、Frey, James H.、王宗吉(2000)。運動社會學。洪葉文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Saunders, Peter(1990)。Social Class and Stratification。London:Routledge。  new window
8.Veblen, T.(1987)。The Theory of the Leisure Class。New York:Viking Penguin Inc.。  new window
9.Bocock, Robert、張君玫、黃鵬仁(1995)。消費。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
10.Smelser, Neil J.、陳光宗(1996)。社會學。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
11.Goodman, Norman、盧嵐蘭(1996)。社會學導論。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
12.許嘉猷(1996)。社會階層化與社會流動。台北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Mills, C. Wright、張君玫(2001)。社會學的想像。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bourdieu, P.(1984)。Distinction。London:Routledge。  new window
15.Giddens, A.(1994)。Beyond Left and Right。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
16.Gordon, Chad(1980)。Development of Evaluated Role Identities。California Annual Reviews, Inc.。  new window
17.Kelly, J. R.(1990)。Freedom to be: A New Sociology of Leisure。NY:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
18.McCall, George、Simmons, J.(1978)。Identies and Interactions。New York:The Free Press。  new window
19.Veblen, T.(1912)。The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institution。New York:Mentor Books。  new window
20.Stokowski, Patricia A.、吳英偉、陳慧玲(1996)。休閒社會學。臺北:五南書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.黃毅志(2002)。社會階層、社會網路與主觀意識--台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern age。Polity Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hill, Reuben、Rodgers, Roy(1964)。The Development Approach。Handbook of Marriage and the Family。Chicago:Rand McNally and Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE