:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一致性到分立性政府的政黨合作與衝突--以第四屆立法院為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:楊婉瑩 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Wan-ying
出版日期:2003
卷期:16
頁次:頁47-93
主題關鍵詞:分立政府一致政府立法院朝野協商政黨合作Divided governmentUnified governmentThe legislative yuanParty bargainParty conflictParty cooperation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(32) 博士論文(8) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:31
  • 共同引用共同引用:146
  • 點閱點閱:109
本文研究第四屆立法院中,由一致政府到分立政府時期,國會運作模式的轉變,特別是其中政黨互動關係的轉變。本文認為第四屆立法院本身呈現出相當豐富的立院政黨生態,並非相關文獻中「分立政府──立法停滯」或是「一致政府──有效統治」的二分對立所能描述解釋,這樣的認知也過於化約行政立法之間政黨互動的複雜性與流動性。 因此本文將逐一檢證立法決策過程的重要階段,包括立法最初階段的政黨提案與立法需求情形、立法過程所遭遇黨際衝突妥協乃至合作、以及立法最終階段的記名投票與政黨投票,由細密的分析中指出在什麼樣的條件下,政黨對立是可行選項,而政黨合作在分立政府下,又是如何成為可能。本文試圖呈顯出第四屆立法院中,在一致與分立的政黨組合形態的政治結構下,政黨合作與衝突兼而有之的例證,包括立法通過數量的增加背後的數字陷阱,立法過程的延遲實現,代表政黨衝突的政黨對立投票減少,以及過度依賴妥協交換式的政黨協商解決衝突等現象。在這樣矛盾的現象中,本文試圖在分立政府的政治結構下,找出導致政黨衝突的行為者動機與資源的解釋,更找出操作政黨合作的政治行為者間共享的目的與資源運算的理性,希望對於台灣分立政府的現象提出脈絡化的解釋。
This study focuses on the operational pattern of the 4th term Legislative Yuan during the unified and divided government, respectively. Especially, I investigate the performance and transformation of party politics during policy-making process. The 4th term Legislative Yuan presents a very rich array of party politics, such that the traditional dichotomous “divided government leads to congressional deadlock” versus “unified government leads to effective governance” cannot fully capture the reality, and this dichotomous view also reduces the complexity and fluidity of the interactions between the executive and legislative branches. Thus, I examine the legislative process from the very beginning of bill-proposition, the prolonged process of party conflict and party bargaining, and the final stage of voting behavior and partisan voting. Through detailed analyses, I show the conditions under which parties will cooperate with or run against each other. This research shows that, under the conditions of the unified and divided government, party conflict and cooperation both works at the same term. I provide evidences: including the relative number of laws supplied and demanded, the delay of law enactments, the decrease of the party voting, and the over-dependence on the inter-party bargaining to solve party conflict. From these contradicting phenomena, this paper attempts to search for the explanation of political actors’ motives and resources to account for the party conflict, to search for the reasons of actors’ shared goals and the calculation rationale to account for party cooperation, and as a whole, to provide a contextual explanation for the functioning of Taiwan’s divided government.
期刊論文
1.Fiorina, Morris P.(1994)。Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism。American Political Science Review,88(2),304-316。  new window
2.Linz, Juan J.(1990)。The Perils of Presidentialism。Journal of Democracy,1(1),51-69。  new window
3.陳陸輝、游清鑫(20010900)。民眾眼中的分立政府--政黨的府會互動與首長施政滿意度。理論與政策,15(3)=59,61-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Binder, Sarah A.(1999)。The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96。American Political Science Review,93(3),519-533。  new window
5.Kelly, Sean Q.(1993)。Divided We Govern: A Reassessment。Polity,25(1),475-484。  new window
6.Shugart, Matthew S.(199506)。The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government。American Political Science Review,89(2),327-343。  new window
7.Mainwaring, Scott(1993)。Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination。Comparative Political Studies,26(2),198-228。  new window
8.Edwards, George C. III、Barrett, Andrew、Peake, Jeffrey(1997)。The Legislative Impact of Divided Government。American Journal of Political Science,41(2),545-563。  new window
9.陳淑芳(20020600)。國會改革五法實施之成效與檢討。月旦法學,85,26-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Alt, James E.、Lowry, Robert C.(1994)。Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States。American Political Science Review,88(4),811-828。  new window
11.Thorson, Gregory(1998)。Divided Government and the Passage of Partisan Legislation, 1947-1990。Political Research Quarterly,51(3),751-764。  new window
12.Krehbiel, Keith(1996)。Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock: A Theory of Divided and Unified Government。Journal of Theoretical Politics,8(1),7-40。  new window
13.吳重禮、林長志(20020300)。我國2000年總統選舉前後中央府會關係的政治影響--核四議題與府會互動的評析。理論與政策,16(1)=61,73-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Sundquist, James L.(1988)。Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States。Political Science Quarterly,103(4),613-635。  new window
15.Cutler, Lloyd N.(1988)。Some Reflections about Divided Government。Presidential Studies Quarterly,18(3),485-492。  new window
16.Erikson, Robert S.(1988)。The Puzzle of Midterm Loss。Journal of Politics,50(4),1011-1029。  new window
17.黃紀、吳重禮(20001200)。臺灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」影響之初探。臺灣政治學刊,4,105-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.吳重禮(20000300)。美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析:兼論臺灣地區的政治發展。問題與研究,39(3),75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.吳重禮(20020600)。美國「分立政府」運作的爭議:以公共行政與政策為例。歐美研究,32(2),271-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Stimson, James A.、Mackuen, Michael B.、Erikson, Robert S.(1995)。Dynamic Representation。American Political Science Review,89(3),543-565。  new window
21.Lohmann, S.、O'Halloran, S.(1994)。Divided Government and U. S. Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence。International Organization,48(4),595-632。  new window
22.Bond, J. R.、Fleisher, R.(1996)。The President in a More Partisan Legislative Arena。Political Research Quarterly,49(4),729-748。  new window
23.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Mathew D.(1994)。Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House。Legislative Studies Quarterly,19(2),215-231。  new window
24.Sinclair, Barbara(1992)。The Emergence of Strong Leadership in the 1980s House of Representatives。Journal of Politics,54(3),657-684。  new window
25.Taylor, A. J.(1998)。Explaining Government Productivity。American Politics Quarterly,26(4),439-458。  new window
26.Weatherford, M. Stephen(1993)。Responsiveness and Deliberation in Divided Government: Presidential Leadership in Tax Policy Making。British Journal of Political Science,24(1),1-31。  new window
27.陳杉榮(1996)。立法院「三黨一派」的黨團運作。國家政策雙周刊,138,6-7。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳敦源、黃東益(1998)。分裂政府在臺灣:地方政治研究的新取向。臺中市:東海大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳俊明(2001)。民進黨的政黨關係初探。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊樹源(2001)。台灣地區「分立政府」與「一致政府」體制運作之比較 : 以新竹縣市與嘉義縣市為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張壹智(2002)。「分立政府」與「一致政府」對於府會關係的影響 : 以台灣地區縣市政府為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.盛杏湲(1996)。Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation : The Case of Taiwan。University of Michigan。  new window
2.Fiorina, Morris(1996)。Divided Government。New York:Macmillan。  new window
3.Cox, gary W.、Kernell, Samuel(1991)。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press。  new window
4.Rohde, D.、Rohde, David(1991)。Parties and Leaders in the Post Reform House。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Bond, Jon R.、Fleisher, Richard(1990)。The President in the Legislative Arena。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Peterson, M. A.(1990)。Legislative Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Edwards, George C. III(1989)。At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
8.Matthews, D. R.、Stimson, J. A.(1975)。Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-making in the U. S. House of Representatives。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
9.Schattschneider, Elmer E.(1942)。Party Government。Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
10.Jones, Charles O.(1994)。The Presidency in a Separated System。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
11.Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
12.Krehbiel, Keith(1998)。Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Sundquist, James L.(1986)。Constitutional Reform and Effective Government。Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution。  new window
14.Jacobson, Gary C.(1990)。The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U. S. House Elections, 1946-1988。Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press。  new window
15.Kingdon, John W.(1981)。Congressmen's Voting Decisions。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
16.Gilmour, J. B.(1995)。Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics。Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics。Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
17.McCubbins, M. D.(1991)。Party Governance and U. S. Budget Deficits: Divided Government and Fiscal Stalemate。Politics and Economics in Eighties。Chicago, IL。  new window
18.Kelly, S. Q.(1994)。Punctuated Change and the Era of Divided Government。New Perspective on American Politics。Washington, DC。  new window
19.Quirk, P. J.、Nesmith, B.(1994)。Divided Government and Policy Making: Negotiating the Laws。The Presidency and the Political System。Washington, DC。  new window
20.(1996)。Rival for Powers: Presidential-Congressional Relations。Rival for Powers: Presidential-Congressional Relations。Washington, DC。  new window
21.(1999)。Classics in Congressional Politics。Classics in Congressional Politics。沒有紀錄。  new window
22.(1998)。Great Theater: the American Congress in the 1990s。Great Theater: the American Congress in the 1990s。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Democracy, Presidential or Parliamentary: Does It Make a Difference?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy。Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.Cox, Gary W.、McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。Divided Control of Fiscal Policy。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
3.Quirk, Paul J.、Nesmith, Bruce(1994)。Explaining Deadlock: Domestic Policymaking in the Bush Presidency。New Perspective on American Politics。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
4.Kernell, Samuel(1991)。Facing an Opposition Congress: The President's Strategic Circumstance。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
5.Petrocik, John R.(1991)。Divided Government: Is It All in the Campaigns?。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE