:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智能障礙學生學習成果之研究:以一所啟智學校為例
書刊名:新竹師院學報
作者:孫淑柔 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Shu-jou
出版日期:2004
卷期:18
頁次:頁207-227
主題關鍵詞:智能障礙學生學習成果啟智學校Mentally retarded studentsMentally retarded schoolLearning outcomes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:49
本研究主要目的在以研究者先前所建立的「身心障礙學生學習成果指標」來探討啟智學校智能障礙學生的學習成果,以及與智能障礙學生學習成果有關的因素。本研究採個案研究設計,選取北部一所啟智學校國中部三年級教師、學生、及家長共62人為研究對象,並以文件和檔案記錄、訪談、觀察、及問卷調查等方式蒐集資料。所得資料以SPSS統計套裝軟體進行百分比、平均數、和標準差的計算;至於訪談、觀察、以及調查表內有關描述性資料,則由研究者進行歸納整理,配合量化資料進行結果的分析和解釋。 研究結果發現:(1)啟智學校國中部三年級學生缺席率高於普通班學生,而且有二位學生長期未到校上課;(2)啟智學校國中部三年級學生學習表現情形較不理想,但在生活自理能力方面卻有明顯的進步;(3)啟智學校國中部三年級學生由於伴隨情緒行為問題,在情緒及團體適應能力表現較差。此外,本研究也歸納出與啟智學生學習成果有關的因素包括:個人、家庭、及學校三方面。 根據上述結果,本研究分別對於教育行政單位以及學校提出可行的建議。
This study was mainly to explore the learning outcomes of the students for the mentally retared school and factors related to these outcomes with the System of Learning outcomes Indicators of Disabled Students. The case study designs method was used, to collect data from 62 mentally retarded students, their parents, and special education teachers. By using documentation and archival records, interview, observation, and survey. Data was analyzed with percentage, means, and standard deviation. The findings of this study were as follows: (1) Mentally retarded students were found to have high rate of school absent and drop out. (2) They were also found to have low learning performance, but have good living skills. (3) They were reported to have difficulties in emotion and behavior management in their classes. (4) Students, their home, and schools were reported to be the crucial factors associated with learning outcomes of mentally retarded students. Therefore, recommendations were made in terms of administration and teaching.
期刊論文
1.Johnson, Neil A.、Holdaway, Edward A.(1993)。School effectiveness and effectiveness indicators。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,4(3),165-188。  new window
2.Fetler, M.(1989)。School dropout rates, academic performance, size, and poverty: Correlates of educational reform。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,11(2),109-116。  new window
3.孫淑柔(20020200)。臺北地區國中小教師對身心障礙學生學習成果指標之研究。新竹師院學報,15,355-381。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Mortimore, P.、Sammons, P.、Stoll, L.、Lewis, D.、Ecob, R.(1988)。A study of effective junior schools。International Journal of Educational Research,13(7),753-768。  new window
5.Cuttance, P. F.(1994)。Monitoring educational quality through performance indicators for school practice。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,5(2),101-126。  new window
會議論文
1.王文科、蕭金土、張昇鵬、李乙明(1999)。我國特殊教育指標建構之研究。第四屆特殊教育「課程與教學」學術研討會。彰化:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。163-202。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.孫淑柔(2000)。身心障礙學生學習成果評鑑之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.敎育部(1998)。特殊教育法暨特殊教育法施行細則。臺北:敎育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(1999)。台閩地區中等以下各級學校學生學習及生活概況調查報告。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Charles, C. M.(1998)。Introduction to educational research。New York:Longman。  new window
4.吳明清(1999)。教育研究:基本觀念與方法分析。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭生玉(1986)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃政傑、李隆盛(1996)。中小學基本學力指標之綜合規劃研究。臺北:台灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
7.U. S. Department of Education(1994)。To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities。Washington, DC:U. S. Department of Education。  new window
8.Ysseldyke, J. E.、Algozzine, B.、Thurlow, M. L.(1992)。Critical Issues in Special Education。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
9.教育部(1995)。中華民國身心障礙教育報告書:充分就學、適性發展。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。  new window
單篇論文
1.DeStefano, L.,Wagner, M.(1991)。Outcome assessment in special education: Lessons learned(ED 327 565)。  new window
2.Wagner, M.,Blackorby, J.,Hebbeler, K.(1993)。Beyond the report card : The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. A report from the national longitudinal transition study of special education students(ED 365 088)。  new window
3.Ysseldyke, J. E.,Thurlow, M. L.,Bruininks, R. H.,Deno, S. L.,McGrew, K. S.,Shriner, J. G.(1991)。A conceptual model of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities(ED 347 732)。  new window
4.Hoagwood, K.(1991)。The effectiveness of special education developing life skills of students(ED 348 798)。  new window
5.Mid-South Regional Resource Center(1986)。Effectiveness indicators for special education: A reference tool(ED 283 336)。  new window
6.Owings, M.,Hennes, J.,Lachat, M. A.,Neiman, K.,Facchina, C.(1990)。An evaluation of special education student outcomes and program quality indicators(ED 332 193)。  new window
7.Teddlie, C.,Falkowski, C.,Stringfield, S.,Desselle, S.,Garvue, R.(1984)。The Louisiana school effectiveness study: Phase two, 1982-84(ED 250 362)。  new window
8.Ysseldyke, J. E.,Thurlow, M. L.(1993)。Developing a Model of Educational Outcomes(ED 366 170)。  new window
其他
1.Warren, S. H.(1993)。Assessment of and accountability for outcomes of students with disabilities: A survey of local school district practices(AAD93-27517)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Danielson, L. C.、Malouf, D. B.(1994)。Federal policy and educational reform: Achieving better outcomes for students with disabilities。Educational outcomes for students with disabilities。New York:The Haworth Press。  new window
2.Ysseldyke, J. E.、Thurlow, M. L.(1994)。Outcomes: Watch your language!。Educational outcomes for students with disabilities。New York:The Haworth Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE