:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由學生自治論學生法庭之建制與功能--以臺大學生法庭為例
書刊名:公民訓育學報
作者:李彥慧
作者(外文):Lee, Yan-huei
出版日期:2004
卷期:15
頁次:頁169-189
主題關鍵詞:學生權利學生自治程序正義正當法律程序學生法庭Student rightsStudent autonomousProcedure justiceDue process of lawStudent court
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:63
我國大學法第十七條第二項前段之規定,賦予各大學應保障並輔導學生成立自治團體之義務,亦使學生取得法律保障的大學自治行政參與權。由於目前我國大學校院學生自治組織架構多為行政、立法、司法三權分立制度,其中屬行政權之學生會、立法權之學生議會已廣為各校成立,但屬司法權之學生法庭,較不受重視。 本文即由憲法基本理論及學生自治內涵之探討,以及程序正義之觀點,維護程序人權在學生法庭之實現;並從學生事務發展理論中的道德發展論,以提昇學生道德層次的發展觀點,肯認學生法庭之重要功能與權限;最後並以台大學生法庭之規範及實際發生案例分析論述,探討學生法庭的功能及其發展方向,以提供日後各校成立學生法庭,培養學生法治觀念及自治能力之參考。
According to the University Law in our country, the Article 17, second part, it gives the university the obligation to protect and assist the students in establishing autonomous associations, which also provides the students with legalized participation in autonomy administration. So far, most of our university autonomous frameworks are divided into three powers: administration, legislation, and jurisdiction. Among them, the power of administration which belongs to Student Association and the legislation to Student Parliament are widely established in universities. But the Student Court, which is responsible for the jurisdiction, is less concerned. This article is based on the basic theory of the constitution, the signification of student autonomy, and the viewpoint of procedure justice. It protects the realization of procedure human rights in Student Court, promotes the theory of Moral development, and approves the importance and the limits of authority of Student Court. At last, this article discusses about the functions and the developments of the Student Court through the real case in NTU Student Court. This is a reference material for other schools in establishing Student Court and in cultivating the legal concept of students and their autonomous ability in the future.
期刊論文
1.許育典(20020900)。學術自由保障下的學生自治。學生事務,41(3),9-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅傳賢(20020600)。程序正義與行政程序法。立法院院聞,30(6)=350,65-78。  延伸查詢new window
3.李建良(20011200)。大學自治、受大學教育權與法律保留原則--「二一退學制度」合憲性的探討。臺灣本土法學雜誌,29,33-46。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張銀富(1992)。大學學生自治政府研究。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃默夫(1999)。行政法--新體系與問題研析。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.周志宏(20020000)。學術自由與高等教育法制。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王煥琛、柯華葳(1999)。青少年心理學。心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.周志宏(1989)。學術自由與大學法。台北:蔚理法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.許育典(20020000)。法治國與教育行政:以人的自我實現為核心的教育法。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.台大學生會(2001)。台大學生會法規彙編。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳範(2002)。從「義務」到「權利」--淺論學生權利之概念。  延伸查詢new window
3.高光義(1997)。淺談大學自治下學生權利的保障。  延伸查詢new window
4.許育典、朱朝煌(2003)。學術自由、大學法制與學生自治。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳德華(1998)。從國內一般性大學組織規程探討大學校園運作之相關問題。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃玉(2002)。大學生發展理論與應用再探。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊仕裕(2002)。大學師生對全校性學生自治選舉態度初探--以輔大為例。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊仕裕(2003)。大學學生權利之綜觀與探析。  延伸查詢new window
9.Evans, N., J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F.(1998)。Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice。  new window
10.McCLINTOCK(1980)。Discipline as a development intervention。  new window
11.Margaret J. Barr(2003)。Legal Foundations of Student Affairs Practice。  new window
12.Student Rights and Freedoms-Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE