:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:經濟認知與經濟參與相關性之調查研究--以北區商業類技職學生為例
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:曾永清 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Yung-ching
出版日期:2005
卷期:50:1
頁次:頁123-138
主題關鍵詞:經濟認知經濟參與商業技職院校Economic literacyEconomic participationCollege of business
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:32
     技職院校係以培育學生兼具分析與實務技能結合之專才為教育目標,經濟教育於此扮演良好角色。經濟學為商學類科之基礎課程,加強其教學方法,將有助於相關理論延續及經濟現況分析運用。經濟參與是公民參與重要的一環,培養學生對經濟事務之參與和關心時事的主動積極態度,亦正是經濟教育之主要目標。國內並無技職學生經濟認知與經濟參與相關研究,本文嘗試設計調查表,取得兩部分資料,以多變量方法分析其間關係,觀察經濟認知與參與間有否具有統計顯著相關。結果顯示性別、學習興趣高低不同學生群中對經濟認知產生顯著差異,雙親職業狀況與教育程度間,則無顯著差異,學生經濟認知能力與其對經濟參與間無典型相關。
     The purpose of a College of Business is to enable students with analytic and practical skills to play an important role in their nation’s economy. Economics is the foundation of the curriculum in every Commercial subject, yet little research has been conducted on the relationship between “economic literacy”(students’ basic understanding of economics, of the whole economic system)and the participation of students in Commercial courses. In fact such economic literary depends on students active “economic participation”(participation in their country’s economy), itself an important part of citizenship. Thus training Commercial students to actively(even aggressively) participate in and (therefore) be vitally concerned about current business and economic affairs in their society should also be an important goal of economic education. Setting out to explore how such a teaching method for Business or Commercial courses might be further developed and improved, this study examined the relationship between Commercial students’ family backgrounds, gender and degree of economic participation on the one hand and their “economic literacy” on the other. A survey was used to collect data, which were then analyzed via a multivariate method. The findings were as follows: there is a significant correlation between economic literacy score and both gender(males scoring higher) and learning interest, but no significant correlation between this score and parental social status and education level; furthermore, no canonical correlation between this score and the degree of their economic participation.
期刊論文
1.鄭慧蘭(20020200)。高中生公民參與態度與行為之研究--以臺北市公立高中為例。公民訓育學報,11,233-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Boex, L. F. J.(2000)。Attributes of effective economics instructors: An analysis of student evaluations。Journal of Economic Education,31(3),211-228。  new window
3.黃美筠(20020700)。國三學生對公民與道德科經濟教材經濟認知成效之評估--以附加價值法探討。公民訓育學報,12,59-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許文傑(20000100)。「公民參與」的理論論述與「公民性政府」的形成。公共行政學報,4,65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Salemi, Michael K.、Siegfried, John J.、Sosin, Kim、Walstad, William B.、Watts, Michael(2001)。Research in Economic Education: Five New Initiatives。The American Economic Review,91(2),440-445。  new window
6.Greene, Benjamin(1997)。Verbal Abilities, Gender, and the Introductory Economics Course: A New Look at an Old Assumption。The Journal of Economic Education,28(1),13-30。  new window
7.Walstad, William B.、Rebeck, Ken(2001)。Assessing the Economic Understanding of U.S. High School Students。The American Economic Review,91(2),452-457。  new window
8.Colander, David(2000)。New Millennium Economics: How Did It Get This Way, and What Way is It?。The Journal of Economic Perspectives,14(1),121-132。  new window
9.Becker, William E.、Watts, Michael(2001)。Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk-and-Talk。American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings,91(2),446-451。  new window
10.Chizmar, John F.、Racich, Matthew J.、Halinski, Ronald S.、McCarney, Bernard J.(1985)。"Give and Take," Economics Achievement, and Basic Skills Development。The Journal of Economic Education,16(2),99-110。  new window
11.Thum, Frederick D.、Aigner, Dennis J.(1986)。On Student Evaluation of Teaching Ability。The Journal of Economic Education,17(4),243-265。  new window
12.Stigler, George J.(1970)。The Case, If Any, for Economic Literacy。The Journal of Economic Education,1(2),77-84。  new window
13.Becker, William E.(2000)。Teaching Economics in the 21st Century。Journal of Economic Perspectives,14(1),109-119。  new window
14.Brown, Eleanor、Hirschfeld, Mary、Moore, Robert L.(1995)。Exploring the Gender Gap on the GRE Subject Test in Economics。The Journal of Economic Education,26(1),3-15。  new window
15.Saunders, Phillip(1980)。The Lasting Effects of Introductory Economics Courses。The Journal of Economic Education,12(1),1-14。  new window
16.Watts, Michael、Becker, William E.(1995)。Teaching Tools: Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Economics。Economic Inquiry,33(4),692-700。  new window
17.Mandelstamm, Allan B.、Petr, Jerry L.、Segebarth, Daniel C.(1971)。The Principles Course Revisited。The Journal of Economic Education,3(1),41-48。  new window
18.Watts, Michael(1987)。Student Gender and School District Differences Affecting the Stock and Flow of Economic Knowledge。The Review of Economics and Statistics,69(3),561-566。  new window
19.Becker, William、Greene, William、Rosen, Sherwin(1990)。Research on High School Economic Education。The American Economic Review,80(2),14-22。  new window
20.Baumol, William J.、Highsmith, Robert J.(1988)。Variables Affecting Success in Economic Education: Preliminary Findings from a New Data Base。The American Economic Review,78(2),257-262。  new window
21.Soper, John C.、Walstad, William B.(1988)。A Report Card on the Economic Literacy of U.S. High School Students。American Economic Review,78(2),251-256。  new window
22.黃美筠(1993)。國立臺灣師範大學大一新生經濟認知之研究。公民訓育學報,3,217-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Salemi, Michael K.、Siegfried, John J.(1999)。The State of Economic Education。The American Economic Review,89(2),355-361。  new window
24.黃美筠(2000)。臺灣地區公立高中三年級學生經濟認知之評量。公民訓育學報,9,129-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃劍華(1999)。臺北地區國民小學高年級學生經濟知識之評量。公民訓育學報,8,311-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.廖添富、劉美慧、董秀蘭(1998)。我國師範院校學生「公民參與態度」與「公民教育觀點」相關性之研究。公民訓育學報,7,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊志賢(2000)。台北市國中生內外控信念、家庭溝通型態與政治參與態度關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣崇禮(2004)。我國大學院校學生菁英政治態度之研究--以桃竹苖地區二十一所大學院校為例(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王若文(1992)。臺北市國中生經濟認知與態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭碧惠(2000)。國中公民與道德科教師基本經濟認知之研究--以台北地區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林麗婷(2001)。國中公民與道德科教師經濟教育專業能力之研究--以高雄地區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.江家慧(2003)。公民參與機制運用於政策規劃過程之研究:以雲林林內焚化廠設置過程為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.余宗羲(2001)。國小高年級學生經濟認知與態度之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
8.周秋潔(2000)。兒童經濟教育教材之研發,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.方詠菁(2001)。高中公民科教師對經濟學教材內涵需求之研究:以臺灣中部地區為例,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.賴佩伶(1998)。臺灣地區商專學生經濟學學習行為之探討,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡欣穎(2000)。國民小學社會科教科書中經濟概念之分析研究,屏東縣屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Udompijitkul, Tumrong(1984)。A Student Model in Economic Education: Factors Influencing a Student's Learning of Economics,Oregon。  new window
13.Stock, Paul A.(1995)。Assessing and Analyzing the Level of Economic Understanding for Eleventh- and Twelfth-grade Students in Southeast Ohio,Ohio。  new window
14.Gibbs, Jeff D.(1985)。Factors Affecting the Achievement of Junior College Students in the Principles of Economics Class,Georgia。  new window
圖書
1.鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mankiw, N. Gregory(1998)。Principles of Economics。Fort Worth, TX:The Dryden Press。  new window
3.Miller, Steven(1991)。The Case for Economic Education in the School Curriculum。Effective Economic Education in the Schools。Washington, DC。  new window
其他
1.孔企平(2001)。論學習方式的轉變,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE