:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界咖啡館討論模式在通識教學場域應用之先導研究
書刊名:通識教育與多元文化學報
作者:周維萱 引用關係周維倫
作者(外文):Chou, Wei-hsuanChou, Wei-lun
出版日期:2014
卷期:4
頁次:頁65-89
主題關鍵詞:世界咖啡館公民參與態度焦點團體The World CaféAttitude of citizen participationFocus group
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:168
期刊論文
1.Aldred, R.(2011)。From Community Participation to Organizational Therapy? World Cafe' and Appreciative Inquiry as Research Methods。Community Development Journal,46(1),57-71。  new window
2.Cohen, J.、Fung, A.(2004)。Radical Democracy。Swiss Journal of Political Science,10,23-34。  new window
3.Lyn, C.(2011)。Designing a Public Conversation Using the World Cafe Method。Social Alternatives,30(1),10-15。  new window
4.沈宗瑞、謝小芩(200512)。大學畢業生對大學發展其多元能力的主觀評價。通識教育季刊,12(4),91-112。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳坤銓(1996)。哈伯馬斯之社會批判理論及其對教育影響之研究。高市鐸聲,7(1),55-61。  延伸查詢new window
6.周維萱、莊旻達(20130600)。世界咖啡館研究構初探--教學場域之實證性分析。通識教育學刊,11,37-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Levinson, M.(2011)。Democracy, Accountability, and Education。Theory and Research in Education,9(2),125-144。  new window
8.Carson, Lyn(2011)。Dilemmas, disasters and deliberative democracy: Getting the public back into policy。Griffith Review,32,38-46。  new window
9.Thunberg, O. A.(2011)。World cafes and dialog seminars as processes for reflective learning in organisations。Reflective Practic,12(3),319-333。  new window
10.Whybrow, A.(2011)。World Cafe Discussion。Coaching Psychologist,7(1),77-82。  new window
11.鄭慧蘭(20020200)。高中生公民參與態度與行為之研究--以臺北市公立高中為例。公民訓育學報,11,233-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蕭揚基(20070100)。公民的形塑與發展:價值多元時代的公民教育。研究與動態,15,141-157。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊,3(1),77-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Morrell, M. E.(2005)。Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy。Political Behavior,27(1),49-69。  new window
15.Cooke, Maeve(2000)。Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy。Political Studies,48(5),947-969。  new window
會議論文
1.洪德仁(2004)。審議式民主在台灣--以北投社區「社造協定公民會議」經驗為例。第二屆地方政府與公共管理學術研討會。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.周維萱(2011)。世界咖啡館融人新移民通識課程之教學研以臺師大「新移民社會與人權」為例。藝術與社會探索教學研討會,149-171。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.King, C. S.、Feltey, K. M.、Susel, B. O.(2008)。The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration。The Age of Direct Citizen Participation。Armonk:M. E. Sharpe Inc.。  new window
2.Leib, E. J.(2004)。Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government。University Park:Penn State University。  new window
3.Reason, P.、Bradbury, H.(2008)。The Sage Handbook of Action Research。London:Sage Publications。  new window
4.Roberts, N. C.(2008)。The Age of Direct Citizen Participation。Armonk:M. E. Sharpe Inc.。  new window
5.教肓部(2011)。100-103年現代公民素養核心能力養成中程計畫說明。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Brown, J.、Issacs, D.、World Café Community(2005)。The world café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter。San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler Publishers。  new window
7.Department for Communities and Local Government(2013)。The Community Development Challenge。Department for Communities and Local Government。  new window
8.Layard, R.(2006)。The depression report: a new deal for depression and anxietydisorders。NZ:University of Auckland。  new window
9.Oliver, Michael(1990)。The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach。New York。  new window
10.Ackerman, B.、Fishkin, J. S.(2004)。Deliberation Day。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
11.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis F.(2004)。Why Deliberative Democracy?。Princeton University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Frederickson, H. G.(2008)。The Recovery of Civism in Public Administration。The Age of Direct Citizen Participation。Armonk:M. E. Sharpe Inc.。  new window
2.Ventriss, C..(2008)。Toward a Public Philosophy of Public Administration: A Civic Perspective of the Public。The Age of Direct Citizen Participation。New York:M. E. Sharpe Inc.。  new window
3.Weeks, E. C.(2008)。The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Trials。The Age of Direct Citizen Participation。New York:M. E. Sharpe Inc.。  new window
4.黃瑞祺、陳閔翔(2010)。審議民主與法治國理想:哈伯馬斯的民主觀。溝通、批判和實踐:哈伯馬斯八十論集。台北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.萬胥亭(20100000)。「溝通」理論的兩個模型--從哈伯馬斯的理性「對話」到德勒茲的「自由間接表述」之精神分裂。溝通、批判和實踐 哈伯馬斯八十論集。臺北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Levinson, M.(2012)。The Third C: College, Career, and Citizenship。Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation。Cambridge, MA:Harvard Education Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE