:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公務人員核心價值與行政倫理
書刊名:考銓季刊
作者:蔡良文
作者(外文):Tsai, Liang-wen
出版日期:2006
卷期:47
頁次:頁16-43
主題關鍵詞:國家利益國家忠誠核心價值核心能力行政中立行政倫理National interestLoyalty to nationCore valuesCore abilitiesAdministrative neutralityAdministrative ethics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:411
  • 點閱點閱:52
公務人員對外代表政府,提供高素質的服務,以大公無私、平等、誠實的態度對待民眾;以具有前瞻、創意、中立與應變能力,因應民眾需求均是其必備的條件。由於當前公務人員在執行職務之際,對於具體個案,經常須本於自身價值觀念及相關法令規定,甚至必須考量是否合於公益、行政程序等因素,而採取最為妥適之處理方式。因此,文官行事作為與倫理價值抉擇上,如何賡續落實依法行政、去官僚化,增強機關核心價值與文官體制的機能與活力,理應受到重視與討論。 吾人認為在行政院核定之創新、進取、專業核心價值之上,應有更高一層次的國家的忠誠、廉能及由行政中立融入行政倫理的判準,強化社會公平正義的行政倫理觀。所以,處之於今日,是一個混沌的時代,也是有為的時代,通常社會亂象源於價值觀的混亂及倫理觀念的日漸淡薄。雖上述說法固有討論的空間,然亦點出價值觀與倫理觀的重要性。因此,在憲法精神、國家利益前提下,對國家、人民忠誠,建立正確的核心價值及倫理觀念,以強化公務人員核心價值與行政倫理的聯結,進一步維持社會和諧與增進人民福祉。
Due to that civil servants represent the government externally and provide high quality services, it is indispensable for a civil servant both to treat people with attitudes of fairness, selflessness, equality and honesty, and to serve people’s need with proactiveness, creativity, neutrality and the ability to cope with emergency. As a result from that currently while performing missions, a civil servant often has to act based on their own concepts of values as well as in accordance with applicable provisions of laws, or even have to take into account whether it is in conformation with factors such as public welfare, administrative procedures etc, in order to take the most appropriate step to deal with any concrete cases. We should give weight to and discuss how a civil servant should do to redress and continue the implementation of both the administration system in pursuant to laws and debureaucratisation to promote the core values of institutions, and functions and energy of civil servant system in determining the actions of execution and ethical values. In our view, there should be a higher level of loyalty to nation, integrity and the judging standard on incorporating administrative ethics into administrative neutrality on the core values of innovation, aggressiveness and specialty specified by Executive Yuan to consolidate the social administrative ethics concepts of fairness and justice. Hence, we now live in a time of chaos, also a time of achievement when social disorder phenomena are caused due to the confusion of value concepts and that the concepts of ethics are becoming feebler and feebler day by day. Although there is still room to discuss the statement above, the statement does point out the significance of concepts of both values and ethics. Consequently, a civil servant shall be loyal to both nation and people based on the Constitutional spirits and national interest to consolidate the connection between core values and administrative ethics and then to further maintain harmony in society and promote the benefits of people by establishing right core values and ethical concepts.
期刊論文
1.蔡良文(20040400)。論政治變遷中保訓體制之變革與發展。考銓季刊,38,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡良文(20050700)。論公務人員行政倫理理論與實踐。人事行政,152,3-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.顧慕晴(19900600)。官僚組織與行政倫理。人事管理,27(6)=316,6-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.顧慕晴(19900700)。官僚組織與行政倫理。人事管理,27(7)=317,12-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hart, D. K.(1984)。The Virtuous Citizen, The Honorable Bureaucrat, and 'Public' Administration。Public Administration Review,44(2),111-120。  new window
6.許水德(19990200)。邁向新世紀公務人員應有的角色。公務人員月刊,32,4-10。  延伸查詢new window
7.林鍾沂(20000600)。新公共行政與新公共管理之比較。人事月刊,30(6)=178,2-4+7-10+13-14+16-21。  延伸查詢new window
8.林水波(19940800)。政策倫理--決策人員應有的新體認。理論與政策,8(4)=32,44-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.盧建旭(19940600)。行政倫理的批判--美國行政倫理理論研究之問題。研考雙月刊,18(3)=181,31-46。  延伸查詢new window
10.彭錦鵬(20000900)。英國政署之組織設計與運作成效。歐美研究,30(3),89-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.施能傑(20040600)。公共服務倫理的理論架構與規範作法。政治科學論叢,20,103-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.彭錦鵬(20050300)。全觀型治理:理論與制度化策略。政治科學論叢,23,61-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蔡良文(2000)。從政權輪替看文官體制之鞏固與發展。《政治變遷與文官體制》學術研討會,考試院、國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所 (會議日期: 2000/09/01)。台北市:政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江明修(1998)。我國公務人力發展的困境與對策。文官制度與國家發展研討會,考試院舉辦 (會議日期: 1998年1月9、10日)。  延伸查詢new window
3.施能傑(2003)。文官體制改造與政府競爭力。臺灣經濟戰略研討會,台灣智庫 (會議日期: 2003/02/22-02/23)。臺北:臺灣智庫。  延伸查詢new window
4.施能傑(2003)。建立公共服務倫理規範:以OECD的標竿經驗。「倡廉反貪與行政透明」學術研討會,台灣透明組織、國際透明組織、世新大學行政管理學系、政治大學公企中心合辦 (會議日期: 2003年4月11日)。臺北:法務部。13-20。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳德禹(2002)。文官行政中立訓練之研究。台北:考試院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.詹靜芬(2003)。我國公務人員行政倫理困境之研究:以中央行政機關中級主管為研究對象(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cooper, Terry L.(2001)。Handbook of Administrative Ethics。New York:Marcel Dekker。  new window
2.Tompkins, J. R.(2005)。Organization Theory and Public Management。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning。  new window
3.蕭武桐(1998)。行政倫理。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Pfiffner, James P.、Brook, Douglas A.(2000)。The Future of Merit: Twenty Years after the Civil Service Reform Act。Washington, DC:The Woodrow Wilson Center Press。  new window
5.吳定(2005)。行政學。台北:空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2000)。Trust in Government: Ethics Measures in OECD Countries。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
7.蔡良文(2006)。人事行政學--論現行考銓制度。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.邱創煥(1995)。整建文官制度厲行行政革新。台北:考試院。  延伸查詢new window
9.姚嘉文(2003)。九十一年公務人員高等計普通考試錄取人員基礎訓練開訓致詞典禮致詞。台北:國家文官培訓所。  延伸查詢new window
10.Denhardt, Robert B.(2000)。The Theories of Public Organization。Harcourt Brace College Publishers。  new window
11.Frederickson, H. George(1993)。Ethics and public administration。Armonk, N.Y.:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
12.Rohr, J. A.(1989)。Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values。New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc.。  new window
13.Denhardt, J. V.、Denhardt, R. B.(2003)。The New Public Serving: Serving, not Steering。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
14.Berman, Even M.、Bowman, James S.、West, Jonathan P.、Van Wart, Montogmery R.(2001)。Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems。Thousand oaks, California:Sage publications。  new window
15.Rosenbloom, David H.、Kravchuk, Robert S.(2005)。Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
16.Denhardt, R. B.、Grubbs, J. W.(1999)。Public administration: An action orientation。Fort Worth, TX。  new window
17.Shafritz, Jay M.、Russell, E. M.(2002)。Introducing Public Administration。New York:Longman Inc.。  new window
18.吳瓊恩、李允傑、陳銘薰(2001)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
19.林鍾沂(2001)。行政學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.Cooper, Terry L.(1994)。Handbook of Administrative Ethics。New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc.。  new window
21.施能傑(1999)。美國政府人事管理。臺北:商鼎文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.彭文賢(1980)。系統研究法的組織理論之分析。台北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Jun, Jong S.(1986)。Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving。New York:Macmillan。  new window
24.蔡良文(19980000)。行政中立與政治發展。臺北:五南圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.孫本初(2005)。公共管理。台北:智勝。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Moore, Mark Harrison(1995)。Creating Public Value: Strategic management in government。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.公務人員保障暨培訓委員會(2006)。95年度高階主管管理核心能力研習班實務計畫,台北:公務人員保障暨培訓委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院人事行政局(2005)。行政院人事行政局核心能力專案報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.朱愛群(1996)。行政倫理的體與用。行政管理論文選輯。臺北:銓敘部。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳瓊恩(1993)。公共行政的規範倫理:互依性、公道與平等。公共行政的行動理論。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.繆全吉(1987)。行政倫理導論。行政管理論文選輯。臺北:銓敘部。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳德禹(2000)。現代行政倫理體系初探。行政管理論文選輯。臺北:銓敘部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE