:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:當強制徵收成為政府補貼?美國聯邦最高法院Kelo v. City of New London案之評析
書刊名:中原財經法學
作者:陳志民 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Andy C. M.
出版日期:2007
卷期:19
頁次:頁1-57
主題關鍵詞:土地強制徵收私用徵收公共利益司法禮讓高價哄抬競租行為徵收補償Eminent domainPrivate takingPublic interestJudicial deferenceHoldoutRent-seeking activitiesCompensation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:257
  • 點閱點閱:63
期刊論文
1.鍾玉美(20050600)。現行土地徵收補償制度之探討。土地問題研究季刊,4(2)=14,74-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Munch, Partricia(1976)。An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain。Journal of Political Economy,84(3),473-498。  new window
3.Calabresi, Guido、Melamed, A. Douglas(1972)。Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral。Harvard Law Review,85(6),1089-1128。  new window
4.賴樹奎(2004)。健全多元配套機制,解決私有既成道路補償問題。土地問題研究季刊,3(1),37-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Been, Vicki(1991)。"Exit" as a Constraint on Land Use Exactions: Rethinking the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine。Columbia Law Review,91,473-473。  new window
6.Kochan, Donald J.(1998)。"Public Use" and the Independent Judiciary: Condemnation in an Interest-group Perspective。Texas Review of Law and Policy,3(1),49-116。  new window
7.Coughlin, Michael J.(2005)。Absolute Deference Leads to Unconstitutional Governance: The Need for a New Public Use Rule。Catholic University Law Review,54,1001-1038。  new window
8.Ellickson, Robert C.(1973)。Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nusiance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls。The University of Chicago Law Review,40,681-681。  new window
9.Sales, Nathan Alexander(1999)。Classical Republicanism and the Fifth Amendment's "Public Use" Requirement。Duke Law Journal,49,339-382。  new window
10.Hart, John F.(1996)。Colonial Land Use Law and Its Significance for Modern Takings Doctrine。Harvard Law Review,109(6),1252-1300。  new window
11.Cohen, Charles E.(2006)。Eminent Domain after Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument Banning Economic Development Takings。Harvard Journal of Law of Public Policy,29,491-491。  new window
12.Hoffman, Elizabeth、Spitzer, Matthew L.(1985)。Entitlement, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concept of Distributive Justice。Journal of Legal Studies,14(2),259-297。  new window
13.Wallace, Scott(2007)。Last of the Amazon。National Geographic,2007(Jan.),40-71。  new window
14.Somin, Ilya(2004)。Overcoming Poletown: County of Wayne v. Hathcock, Economic Development Taking, and the Future of Public Use。Michigan State Law Review,2004(4),1005-1039。  new window
15.Michaelman, Frank I.(1967)。Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of "Just Compensation" Law。Harvard Law Review,80(6),1165-1258。  new window
16.Krier, James E.、Serkin, Christopher(2004)。Public Ruse。Michigan State Law Review,2004,859-876。  new window
17.Lazzarotti, Joseph J.(1999)。Public Use or Public Abuse。UMKC Law Review,68,49-75。  new window
18.Talley, Brett(2006)。Restraining Eminent Domain through Just Compensation: Kelo v. City of New London。Harvard Journal of Law of Public Policy,29,759-759。  new window
19.Fennell, Lee Anne(2004)。Taking Eminent Domain Apart。Michigan State Law Review,2004(4),957-957。  new window
20.Bukowczyk, John J.(1984)。The Decline and Fall of a Detroit Neighborhood: Poletown vs. G.M. and the City of Detroit。Washington and Lee Law Review,41,49-76。  new window
21.Merrill, Thomas W.(1986)。The Economics of Public Use。Cornell Law Review,72,61-116。  new window
22.Fischel, William A.(2004)。The Political Economy of Public Use in Poletown: How Federal Encourage Excessive Use of Eminent Domain。Michigan State Law Review,2004,929-929。  new window
23.Meidinger, Errol E.(1980)。The Public Uses of Eminent Domain。Environmental Law,11,1-66。  new window
24.Garnett, Nicole Stelle(2003)。The Public-use Question as a Taking Problem。George Washington Law Review,71,934-934。  new window
25.Knetsch, Jack L.、Sinden, J. A.(1984)。Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,99,507-507。  new window
學位論文
1.張嘉紋(2001)。我國土地徵收法制之探討--以行政法院裁判為中心(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Epstein, Richard A.(1985)。Takings: private Property and the Power of eminent Domain。  new window
2.陳新民(1992)。憲法基本權利之基本理論。臺北:陳新民。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Staley, Samuel R.、Blair, John P.(2005)。Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Development: An Economic Development Analysis。Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Development: An Economic Development Analysis。0。  new window
其他
1.Brnovich, Mark(2004)。Condemning Condemnation: Alternatives to Eminent Domain,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.李建良(2006)。損失補償。行政法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE