現行國賠法第3條第1項限於「公有」公共設施，在社會變遷下，已經不符合國賠法保障人民權利之宗旨，且在最高法院做出最新判例後，國賠法第3條第1項適用範圍已有擴張，但仍未能解決「私有公營」之問題，必須透過修法解決。本文乃就現行法之規定、外國立法例說明、最高法院判例意皆等概念解構現行國賠法第3條之要件與適用情形，並研究立法院多次提案內容以及現今政府委外之實務操作，提出修法方向與建議條文，並提出配套措施（輔以投資契約轉嫁與保險分擔），形成一完整之架構。

Paragraph 1, Article 3 of the State Compensation Law is only applicable to the “government-owned”public facility. However, with the transformation in the society, this provision cannot satisfy the objective to protect the people’s right any longer. Though the latest decision of the Supreme Court shows that the scope of application of Paragraph 1, Article 3 of the State Compensation Law has been broadened, the “private state-owned enterprise” issue still is unresolved. Therefore, it is necessary to resolve the issue by amendments to laws. In this paper, we interpret the requirements and application of Article 3 of the State Compensation Law according to the existing laws, interpretation about foreign legislation, the intent of the Supreme Court decisions, and also study the contents of proposals made at the Legislative Yuan and the existing outsourcing practices operated by the government, and then identify the orientation towards the amendments to laws and propose suggested provisions and certain alternative measures (aided under investment contract transfer and insurance contributions).